JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Arthroscopic Versus Mini-Open Salvage Repair of the Rotator Cuff Tear : Outcome Analysis at Two to Six Years Follow-up
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
  • Volume 5, Issue 2,  2002, pp.88-97
  • Publisher : Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
  • DOI : 10.5397/CiSE.2002.5.2.088
 Title & Authors
Arthroscopic Versus Mini-Open Salvage Repair of the Rotator Cuff Tear : Outcome Analysis at Two to Six Years Follow-up
Kim, Seung-Ho; Ha, Kwon-lck; Park, Jong-Hyuk; Kang, Jin-Seok; Oh, Sung-Kyun; Oh, Ir-Vin; Yoo, Jae-Chul;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes between arthroscopir repair and mini-open repair of medium and large rotator cuff tears in which arthroscopic repair was technically unsuccessful. We evaluated 76 patients of full-thickness rotator cuff tears, among them 42 patients had all-arthroscopic and 34 patients had mini-open salvage repairs. Patients who had acromioclavicular arthritis, subscapularis tear, or instability were excluded. There were 39 males and 37 females with mean age of 56 years (range,42 to 75 years). At a mean follow-up of 39 months (range, 24 to 64 months), the results of both groups were compared with regard to the UCLA and ASES shoulder rating scale s. Shoulder scores improved in all ratings in both groups (p > 0.05). Overall, sixty-six patients showed excellent or gr)of and ten patients showed fair or poor scores by the UCLA scale. Seventy-two patients satisfactorily returned to prior activity. Four showed unsatisfactory return. The range of motion, strength, and patient's satisfaction were improved postoperatively. There were no difference in shoulder scores, pain, and activity return between the arthroscopic and mini-open salvage groups (p > 0.05). However, Patients with larger size tear showed lower shoulder scores and less predictive recovery of the strength and function (p < 0.05). Postoperative pain was not different with respect to the size of the tear (p : 0.251). Arthroscopic repair of medium and large full-thickness rotator cuff tears had iln equal outcome to technically unsuccessful arthroscopic repairs, which were salvaged by conversion to a mini- open repair technique. Surgical outcome depended on the size of the tear, rather than the method of repair.
 Keywords
Rotator cuff tear;Arthroscopic repair;Mini-open salvage Outcome;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Adamson GJ and JE Tibone: Ten-year assessment of primary rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2:57-63, 1993. crossref(new window)

2.
Ellman H, G Hanker and M Bayer: Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 68: 1136-44, 1986.

3.
Gartsman GM, MR Brinker and M Khan: Early effectiveness of arthroscopic repair for full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: an outcome analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 80:33-40, 1998. crossref(new window)

4.
Gartsman GM, M Khan and SM Hammerman: Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 80: 832-40, 1998.

5.
Tauro JC: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: analysis of technique and results at 2-and 3-year follow-up. Arthroscopy, 14:45-51, 1998. crossref(new window)

6.
Weber SC and R Schaefer: "Mini Open" versus traditional open repair in the management of small and moderate size tears of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy, 9:365-366, 1993.

7.
Hersch JC and NA Sgaglione: Arthroscopically assisted mini-open rotator cuff repairs. Functional outcome at 2-to 7-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med, 28:301-11, 2000.

8.
Liu SH and CL Baker: Arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repair: correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. Arthroscopy, 10:54-60, 1994. crossref(new window)

9.
Snyder SJ: Evaluation and treatment of the rotator cuff. Orthop Clin North Am, 24: 173-92, 1993.

10.
Bigliani LU, DS Morrison and EW April: The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans, 10:2, 1986.

11.
Richard RR, KN An, LU Bigliani, et al.: A standard method for the assessment of shoudler function. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 3: 347-352, 1994.

12.
Wallerstein SL: Scaling clinical pain and pain relief, New York, NY, Elsevier, 1984.

13.
Kim SH and KI Ha: Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic shoulders with minimally displaced greater tuberosity fracture. Arthroscopy, 16:695-700, 2000. crossref(new window)

14.
Outerbridge RE: The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 43: 752-757, 1961.

15.
Kim SH and KI Ha: The SMC knot--a new slip knot with locking mechanism. Arthroscopy, 16: 563-5, 2000. crossref(new window)

16.
Kim SH, KI Ha and JS Kim: Significance of the internal locking mechanism for loop security enhancement in the arthroscopic knot. Arthroscopy, 17:850-5, 2001. crossref(new window)

17.
Iannotti JP: Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Factors Affecting Surgical Outcome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2: 87-95, 1994.

18.
Hawkins RJ, GW Misamore and PE Hobeika: Surgery for full-thickness rotator-cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 67: 1349-55, 1985.

19.
Packer NP, PT Calvert, JI Bayley and L Kessel: Operative treatment of chronic ruptures of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 65: 171-5, 1983.

20.
Samilson RL and WF Binder: Symptomatic full thickness tears of rotator cuff. An analysis of 292 shoulders in 276 patients. Orthop Clin North Am, 6: 449-66, 1975.

21.
Bigliani LU, SJ McIlveen, FA Cordasco and ES Musso: Operative management of failed rotator cuff repairs. Orthop Trans, 12: 674, 1998.

22.
Groh GI, M Simoni, P Rolla and CA Rockwood: Loss of the deltoid after shoulder operations: An operative disaster. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 3: 243-253, 1994. crossref(new window)

23.
Neviaser RJ and T Neviaser: Reoperation for failed rotator cuff repair: analysis of fifty cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 1: 283-286, 1992. crossref(new window)

24.
Warner JJ, RJ Goitz, JJ Irrgang and YJ Groff: Arthroscopic-assisted rotator cuff repair: patient selection and treatment outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 6: 463-72, 1997. crossref(new window)

25.
Liu SH: Arthroscopically-assisted rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 76: 592-5, 1994.

26.
Bartolozzi A, D Andreychik and S Ahmad: Determinants of outcome in the treatment of rotator cuff disease. Clin Orthop, 90-7, 1994.

27.
Gazielly DF, P Gleyze and C Montagnon: Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop, 43-53, 1994.

28.
Rokito AS, JD Zuckerman, MA Gallagher and F Cuomo: Strength after surgical repair of the rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 5: 12-7, 1996. crossref(new window)

29.
Romeo AA, DW Hang, BR Bach, Jr. and S Shott: Repair of full thickness rotator cuff tears. Gender, age, and other factors affecting outcome. Clin Orthop, 243-55, 1999.