JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Correlation of Clinical Outcome and Cuff Integrity after Open Repair in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
  • Volume 10, Issue 1,  2007, pp.65-72
  • Publisher : Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
  • DOI : 10.5397/CiSE.2007.10.1.065
 Title & Authors
Correlation of Clinical Outcome and Cuff Integrity after Open Repair in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
Noh, Haeng-Kee; Wang, Joon-Ho; Kim, Dong-Hwee; Park, Jong-Woong; Kim, Jae-Gyoon; Park, Jung-Ho;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between the clinical outcome and the cuff integrity following open repair in large and massive rotator cuff tears using ultrasonography as an imaging modality. Material and Methods: From November 2001 to April 2005, 17 cases(16 patients) who had open repair of tear measuring more than 3cm were assessed with minimal follow-up of 12 months in this study. 6 cases had a large tear and 11 cases a massive tear. There were 6 men and 11 women with a mean age of 52 years at surgery (range, 33 to 72 years). The evaluation consisted of the preoperative and postoperative shoulder scores according to UCLA shoulder scoring system and Visual analogue scale (VAS). Ultrasonography was performed by a experienced musculoskeletal physician at a minimum of 12 months postoperatively to evaluate the postoperative cuff integrity. Results: Retear were detected in four of seventeen cases. Regardless of the presence of recurrent tear, 14 cases had UCLA score of more than 29 points (good grade). All 17 had an improvement in the functional score, which increased from an average of 15.1 to 31.2 points. All cases showed pain relief and five cases had no pain. Sixteen cases except one had the range of motion of forward elevation above . Conclusion: Open rotator cuff repair in large and massive tears showed low retear rate. At a minimum of twelve months follow-up, all cases had improvement on UCLA score, pain relief, increased range of motion of the shoulder regardless of retear. And the correlation between recurrent tear and function score was not statistically significant.
 Keywords
Rotator cuff tear;Open repair;Ultrasonography;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
회전근 개 파열 봉합술 후 재파열 환자에서 임상결과와 원인 인자,전재명;송정석;손동욱;

Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow, 2008. vol.11. 1, pp.29-36 crossref(new window)
1.
Clinical Outcome and Causative Factor in Patients of Structural Failure after Rotator Cuff Repair, The Journal of the Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society, 2008, 11, 1, 29  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Baker CL, Liu SH: Comparison of open and arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med, 23: 99-104, 1995. crossref(new window)

2.
Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo IK, Bird J, Gladstone JN, Flatow EL: Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 15: 290-299, 2006. crossref(new window)

3.
Burkhart SS: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Indication and technique. Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, 5: 204-214, 1997. crossref(new window)

4.
Burkhart SS, Danaceau SM, Pearce CE, Jr: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Analysis of results by tear size and by repair technique-margin convergence versus direct tendon-to-bone repair. Arthroscopy, 17: 905-912, 2001. crossref(new window)

5.
Ahn BW, Yoon JH, Jung SW, et al: Open Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Society, 9: 20-26, 2006. crossref(new window)

6.
Calvert PT, Packer NP, Stoker DJ, Bayley JI, Kessel L: Arthrography of the shoulder after operative repair of the torn rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 68: 147-150, 1986.

7.
Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M: Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 68: 1136-1144, 1986.

8.
Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K: The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86: 219-224, 2004.

9.
Gartsman GM: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 95-106, 2001.

10.
Gazielly DF, Gleyze P, Montagnon C: Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 43-53, 1994.

11.
Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J: The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 82: 505-515, 2000.

12.
Harryman DT, 2nd, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA, 3rd: Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 73: 982-989, 1991.

13.
Jost B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C, Switzerland Z: Clinical outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 82: 304-314, 2000. crossref(new window)

14.
Kim SH, Ha KI, Park JH, Kang JS, Oh SK, Oh I: Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years'follow-up. Arthroscopy, 19: 746-754, 2003. crossref(new window)

15.
Knudsen HB, Gelineck J, Sojbjerg JO, Olsen BS, Johannsen HV, Sneppen O: Functional and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation after single-tendon rotator cuff reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 8: 242-246, 1999. crossref(new window)

16.
Liu SH, Baker CL: Arthroscopically assisted rotator cuff repair: correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. Arthroscopy, 10: 54-60, 1994. crossref(new window)

17.
Neviaser RJ: Tears of the rotator cuff. Orthop Clin North Am, 11: 295-306, 1980.

18.
Post M: Complications of rotator cuff surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 97: 104, 1990.

19.
Schneeberger AG, von Roll A, Kalberer F, Jacob HA, Gerber C: Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84: 2152-2160, 2002.

20.
Chung ST, Kim HS, Yoo JH, et al: Mini-Open Repair in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Society, 9: 176-180, 2006. crossref(new window)

21.
Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K: Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 82: 498-504, 2000.

22.
Thomazeau H, Boukobza E, Morcet N, Chaperon J, Langlais F: Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 275: 283, 1997.

23.
Warner JJ, Goitz RJ, Irrgang JJ, Groff YJ: Arthroscopic-assisted rotator cuff repair: patient selection and treatment outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 6: 463-472, 1997. crossref(new window)

24.
Wilson F, Hinov V, Adams G: Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: 2-to 14-year follow-up. Arthroscopy, 18: 136-144, 2002. crossref(new window)