JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Diagnostic Consistency between Sonoelastography and Conventional Sonography of Long Head of the Biceps
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
  • Volume 17, Issue 3,  2014, pp.107-113
  • Publisher : Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
  • DOI : 10.5397/cise.2014.17.3.107
 Title & Authors
Diagnostic Consistency between Sonoelastography and Conventional Sonography of Long Head of the Biceps
Yoon, Sunghyun; Seo, Joong-Bae; Yoo, Jae-Sung; Ryu, Jee-Won;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Background: Sonoelastography (SE) is a new technique that can assess differences in tissue stiffness, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of SE to assess the long head of biceps tendon alteration. Methods: Forty shoulders of 36 consecutively registered patients with clinical symptoms and conventional ultrasonography findings of biceps tendinitis or tendinosis, and 40 asymptomatic shoulders of 20 healthy volunteers were assessed with SE. Transverse and longitudinal images of long head of biceps tendon were obtained using SE. SE images were performed by one orthopedic surgeon and evaluated by two orthopedic surgeons using an experimentally proven color grading system. Results: The transverse images of SE showed a sensitivity of 87.5%, a specificity of 95.0% and a accuracy of 91.3%, the longitudinal images of SE showed a sensitivity of 92.5%, a specificity of 90.0% and a accuracy of 91.3%. Inter-observer reliability of SE was in 'almost perfect agreement' with a weighted kappa coefficient of 0.83. Conclusions: SE is valuable in the detection of the intratendinous and peritendinous alterations of biceps tendon, and has excellent accuracy and excellent correlation with conventional ultrasound findings.
 Keywords
Biceps brachii;Tendinopathy;Elasticity imaging techniques;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Patton WC, McCluskey GM 3rd. Biceps tendinitis and subluxation. Clin Sports Med. 2001;20(3):505-29. crossref(new window)

2.
Abrams JS. Special shoulder problems in the throwing athlete: pathology, diagnosis, and nonoperative management. Clin Sports Med. 1991;10(4):839-61.

3.
Kibler WB. Scapular involvement in impingement: signs and symptoms. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:35-43.

4.
Sethi N, Wright R, Yamaguchi K. Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8(6):644-54. crossref(new window)

5.
Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239(2):341-50. crossref(new window)

6.
Frey H. Realtime elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity. Radiologe. 2003;43(10):850-5. crossref(new window)

7.
Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology. 1997;202(1):79-86. crossref(new window)

8.
Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, et al. Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology. 2005;237(1):202-11. crossref(new window)

9.
Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P, et al. Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(9):2278-85. crossref(new window)

10.
Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, et al. Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography--initial experience. Radiology. 2007;243(1):258-67. crossref(new window)

11.
Zanetti M, Hodler J. Imaging of degenerative and posttraumatic disease in the shoulder joint with ultrasound. Eur J Radiol. 2000;35(2):119-25. crossref(new window)

12.
Seo JB, Yoo JS, Ryu JW. Sonoelastography findings of biceps tendinitis and tendinosis. J Ultrasound. 2014. doi: 10.1007/s40477-014-0075-8. crossref(new window)

13.
Armstrong A, Teefey SA, Wu T, et al. The efficacy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of long head of the biceps tendon pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(1):7-11. crossref(new window)

14.
Arroyo JS, Hershon SJ, Bigliani LU. Special considerations in the athletic throwing shoulder. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997;28(1):69-78. crossref(new window)

15.
Fredberg U, Stengaard-Pedersen K. Chronic tendinopathy tissue pathology, pain mechanisms, and etiology with a special focus on inflammation. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008;18(1):3-15. crossref(new window)

16.
Khan KM, Forster BB, Robinson J, et al. Are ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of value in assessment of Achilles tendon disorders? A two year prospective study. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(2):149-53. crossref(new window)

17.
Mohtadi NG, Vellet AD, Clark ML, et al. A prospective, double-blind comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the evaluation of patients presenting with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(3):258-65. crossref(new window)

18.
Ahrens PM, Boileau P. The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(8):1001-9.

19.
King LJ, Healy JC. Imaging of the painful shoulder. Man Ther. 1999;4(1):11-8. crossref(new window)

20.
Lecoq B, Levasseur R, Fournier L, Schmutz G, Marcelli C. Atypical pattern of acute severe shoulder pain: contribution of sonography. Joint Bone Spine. 2004;71(6):592-4. crossref(new window)

21.
Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Prato N, et al. US of the shoulder: nonrotator cuff disorders. Radiographics. 2003;23(2):381-401;quiz 534. crossref(new window)

22.
Parameswaran K, Willems-Widyastuti A, Alagappan VK, Radford K, Kranenburg AR, Sharma HS. Role of extracellular matrix and its regulators in human airway smooth muscle biology. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2006;44(1):139-46. crossref(new window)

23.
Khoury V, Cardinal E. "Tenomalacia": a new sonographic sign of tendinopathy? Eur Radiol. 2009;19(1):144-6. crossref(new window)

24.
De Zordo T, Chhem R, Smekal V, et al. Real-time sonoelastography: findings in patients with symptomatic achilles tendons and comparison to healthy volunteers. Ultraschall Med. 2010; 31(4):394-400. crossref(new window)

25.
De Zordo T, Lill SR, Fink C, et al. Real-time sonoelastography of lateral epicondylitis: comparison of findings between patients and healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(1):180-5. crossref(new window)