JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Gap of Cobalt-Chromium Sintering Metal Coping Fabricated by Dental CAD/CAM System
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Journal of dental hygiene science
  • Volume 15, Issue 5,  2015, pp.536-541
  • Publisher : the Korean Society of Dental Hygiene science
  • DOI : 10.17135/jdhs.2015.15.5.536
 Title & Authors
Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Gap of Cobalt-Chromium Sintering Metal Coping Fabricated by Dental CAD/CAM System
Kim, Dong-Yeon; Sin, Chun-Ho; Jung, Il-Do; Kim, Ji-Hwan; Kim, Woong-Chul;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal and internal gap of Cobalt (Co)-Chromium (Cr) sintering metal coping fabricated by dental computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Abutment tooth 46 of universal numbering system was selected for the study. Twenty Co-Cr metal copings of two groups were manufactured and scanned. Co-Cr cast metal copings (CCM) group of ten were fabricated using investment, burnout and casing after subtractive manufacturing of wax block. Also, Co-Cr sintering metal copings (CSM) group of ten were fabricated using sintering processing after subtractive manufacturing of Co-Cr soft metal bock. Marginal and internal gap of Co-Cr metal copings of twenty were measured by digital microscope () with silicone replica technique. The data was analyzed from IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 22.0 Statistical software for Mann-Whitney U test (). deviation of marginal gap of CCM group was of CSM group was . However, two groups was statistically not different (p>0.05). This study showed that CSM group was clinically acceptable adaptation.
 Keywords
Adaptation;Cobalt;Computer-aided design;Chromium;Marginal;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Duret F, Preston J: CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent 1: 150-154, 1991.

2.
Pradies G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, Ferreiroa A, Martinez-Rus F: Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 43: 201-208, 2015. crossref(new window)

3.
van Noort R: The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 28: 3-12, 2012. crossref(new window)

4.
Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim JH: Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent 112: 1432-1436, 2014. crossref(new window)

5.
Hildebrand HF, Veron C, Martin P: Nickel, chromium, cobalt dental alloys and allergic reactions: an overview. Biomaterials 10: 545-548, 1989. crossref(new window)

6.
Magnusson B, Bergman M, Bergman B, Soremark R: Nickel allergy and nickel-containing dental alloys. Eur J Oral Sci 90: 163-167, 1982. crossref(new window)

7.
Lee JH, Ahn JS: The effect of a au based bonding agent coating on non precious metals-ceramic bond strength. J Dent Hyg Sci 9: 153-160, 2009.

8.
Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona A: Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 29: 174-180, 2013. crossref(new window)

9.
Napankangas R, Raustia A: Twenty-year follow-up of metalceramic single crowns: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 21: 307-311, 2007.

10.
Kim DY, Jeon JH, Park JY, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC: Comparison of the marginal and internal gap of metal coping according to processing method of dental CAD/CAM System. J Dent Hyg Sci 15: 12-17, 2015. crossref(new window)

11.
Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH: An evaluation of marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by direct metal laser sintering system. Dent Mater 29: 91-96, 2013.

12.
Kokubo Y, Tsumita M, Kano T, Sakurai S, Fukushima S: Clinical marginal and internal gaps of zirconia all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthodont Res 55: 40-43, 2011. crossref(new window)

13.
Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH: Clinical fit of procera allceram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 84: 419-424, 2000. crossref(new window)

14.
Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R: The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1: 197-199, 1985. crossref(new window)

15.
Molin M, Karlsson S: The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems: a clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 51: 201-206, 1993. crossref(new window)

16.
Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M: Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci 117: 319-325, 2009. crossref(new window)

17.
McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA: The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131: 107-111, 1971. crossref(new window)

18.
Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice K: Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 26: 367-374, 2001.

19.
Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C: A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 112: 555-560, 2014. crossref(new window)

20.
Behr M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Schneider-Feyrer S, Handel G: In-vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaption of fibre-reinforced adhesive fixed partial inlay dentures. J Dent 27: 163-168, 1999. crossref(new window)

21.
Behr M, Rosentritt M, Regnet T, Lang R, Handel G: Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems. Dent Mater 20: 191-197, 2004. crossref(new window)