Study on Early Adhesive Characteristic of Chip Seals Using a Surface Energy Approach

Title & Authors
Study on Early Adhesive Characteristic of Chip Seals Using a Surface Energy Approach
Im, Jeong Hyuk;

Abstract
PURPOSES : The objective of this study is to evaluate the early adhesive characteristic of asphalt emulsions, including polymer-modified emulsions, for chip seals using the surface energy concept, the bitumen bond strength (BBS) test, and the Vialit test. METHODS : Two general methods, the BBS test and Vialit test, were applied to investigate the bond strength and the aggregate loss, respectively. A new theory, the surface free energy (SFE) theory, was used to evaluate the adhesive characteristic between the emulsion and the aggregate. Based on the theory, the contact angles were measured, and then the surface energy components were calculated. Using those components, the work of adhesion (Wa) was calculated for each emulsion. To ensure reliable results, all the tests were performed under the same conditions, i.e., at $\small{25^{\circ}C}$ for 240 minutes of curing time. For the materials, three emulsions (CRS-2, CRS-2L, and CRS-2P) and one aggregate type (granite) were employed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS : Under the same conditions, the modified emulsions showed better adhesive characteristics and curing behaviors than the unmodified emulsions. In addition, there was no significant difference between the various modified emulsions. One of the important findings is that the analysis by Wa presents more sensitive results than other methods. The results of the Wa showed that the CRS-2P emulsion has the best adhesive characteristics. Consequently, the use of modified emulsions for chip seals could prevent aggregate loss and allow open traffic earlier.
Keywords
Language
Korean
Cited by
References
1.
AASHTO TP:91-11. Standard Test Method of Test for Dertermining Asphalt Binder Strength by Means of the Asphalt Bond Strength (ABS) Test. American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO).

2.
Basic Asphalt Recycling Manual (2001), Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association (ARRA), Maryland, USA.

3.
BS EN 12272-3. Surface Dressing Test Method Part 3:Determination of Binder Aggregate Adhesivity by the Vialit Plate Shock Test Method, British Standards Institution.

4.
Gransberg, D. and D.B. James (2005), NCHRP Synthesis 342, Chip Seal Best Practices, Trasportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 8.

5.
Im, J.H., Y.R. Kim, and S.L. Yang (2014), Bond Strength Evaluation of Asphalt Emulsions used in Asphalt Surface Treatments. International Journal of Highway Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 1-8.

6.
Im, J.H. and Y.R. Kim (2015), Performance Evaluation of Fog Seals on Chip Seals and Verification of Fog Seal Field Tests. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 11, pp. 872-880.

7.
Im, J.H., Y.R. Kim, and C. Baek (2015), Performance Evaluation of Surface Treatments for Asphalt Pavement Preservation. International Journal of Highway Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 89-98.

8.
Little, D.N. and A. Bhasin (2006). Using Surface Energy Measurements to Select Materials for Asphalt Pavement. Final Report of Project 9-37, Texas Transportation Institute, National Cooperative Highway Research Program.

9.
Masad, E. C. Zollinger, R. Bulut, D.N. Little, and R.L. Lytton (2006). Characterization of HMA Moisture Damage Using Surface Energy and Fracture Properties. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 75, pp. 713-748.

10.
Reynolds, P. (2005). Colloid Science-Principles, Methods, and Applications. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Chapter 9, pp. 159-178.

11.
Schrader, M.E. (1995). Young-Dupre Revisited. Langmuir, Vol. 11, pp. 3585-3589.

12.
Shanahan, M.E.R. (1991). Adhesion and Wetting: Similarities and Differences. Rubber World, Vol. 205, pp. 28-36.

13.
van Oss, C.J., M.K. Chaudhury, and R.J. Good (1987). Monopolar Surfaces. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 11, pp. 3585-3589.

14.
Young, T. (1804). An Essay on the Cohesion of Fluids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Vol. 95, pp. 65-87.