JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Aerodynamic Design of the KARI Mid-sized Aerostat
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Aerodynamic Design of the KARI Mid-sized Aerostat
Huh, Lynn; Park, Young-Min; Chang, Byeong-Hee; Lee, Yung-Gyo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Aerodynamic shape design of the Mid-sized Aerostat was performed with computational fluid dynamics. Design procedure included determination of hull volume and length, hull shape, tailfin configuration with anhedral and location, tailfin section. For aerodynamic analysis, three dimensional Navier-Stokes equations were applied with Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model. During design procedure, static moment derivatives were mainly considered for the stability of aerostat and structural limitations were also considered for practical application of the designed shape. Aerodynamic analysis of the designed aerostat was carried out and aerodynamic characteristics were compared with those of the TCOM 71m aerostat, one of the most successful commercial aerostats. It was found that the designed KARI Mid-sized Aerostat had better stability characteristics compared to the TCOM 71m aerostat.
 Keywords
Aerostat;Aerodynamic Shape Design;Static Stability;CFD;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Tureaud, T. F., and Smith, N. S., Wind Tunnel Characterization of a Scaled Class IV Aerostat, AIAA-97-1487, 12th AIAA Lighter-Than-Air Systems Technology Conference, 1997

2.
Malik, S., Gupta, S., Sharma, V., Purkait, P. K., and Singh, A., Drag Measurement Through Wind Tunnel Testing for Different Hull Shapes Used in Aerostat Application, Aerodynamic and Mechanical Decelerations and Inflatable Systems; Para India '99, 1999

3.
Kale, Sagar M. and Joshi, Pankaj, A Generic Methodology for Determination of Drag Coefficient of an Aerostat Envelope Using CFD, AIAA 5th Aviation, Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO) and 16th Lighter-Than-Air Systems Technology Conference and Balloon Systems Conference, September 2005, Arlington, USA, 2005

4.
Ok, H., Aerodynamic Design of a 50-meter Class Airship and Prediction of Its Aerodynamic Characteristics, KARl-AD-RP 2001-020, 2001

5.
Kim, D. M., Lee, Y. G., Kang, W. G., and Moon, S. M., Conceptual Design of an Aerostat, KARl-ARD-RP-2004-004, 2004

6.
TCOM, L. P., Company History and Experience, TCOM, Columbia, Maryland

7.
Badesha, S., and Jones, S. P., Aerodynamics of the TCOM 71m Aerostat, AIAA-93-4036-CP, 1993

8.
Jones, S. P., and Shroeder, L. D., Nonlinear Dynamic Simulation of a Tethered Aerostat: A Fidelity Study, AIAA99-4325. 1999

9.
Reddy, B. K., and Pajagopal, P., Response Analysis of Tethered Aerostat to Atmospheric Gusts, Aerodynamic and Mechanical Decelerations and Inflatable Systems; Para India '99, 1999

10.
Park, Y. M., Huh, L., and Chang, B. H., Aerodynamic Design Optimization of 30m Aerostat, KARl ADG-TN·- 2005-005, 2005