JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Assessment of Pollutant Loads in the Dongjin River
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Assessment of Pollutant Loads in the Dongjin River
Lee, Kyeong-Bo; Kim, Jong-Cheon; Kim, Jong-Gu; Lee, Deog-Bae; Park, Chan-Won; Kim, Jae-Duk;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of pollutant loads on the water quality in the Dongjin River area from January 2003 to December 2004. The average value of BOD and T-N showed the highest peak in Yongho, Dukcheon watershed among Dongjin River. Concentrations of BOD, T-N and T-P in Jeongeup watershed were 2.29 mg , 4.40 mg and 0.27 mg , respectively. Concentration of BOD in Chilbo was 1.19 mg which would be in the grade I according to water quality criteria by Ministry of Environment. The BOD level in Wonpeung and Sinpeung watershed ranged from 4.06 to 7.35 mg . The T-N effluent loads of non-point pollutants were high in Wonpeung, Gobu, Yongho Dukcheon, Jeongeup and Sinpeung watershed in order. The major sources of BOD, T-N and T-P effluent loads were Livestock. The T-P effluent load of non-point pollutant was 68 kg in Wonpeung, 58 kg in Yongho Dukcheon and 45 kg Jeongeup watershed. The delivered loads of BOD was high in Gobucheon, while both T-N and T-P were high in Yongho Dukcheon. The delivery ratio of BOD and T-N at dry season was below 100% in all watershed of Dongjin River. The delivery ratio of T-N at raining season was high in Yongho Dukcheon and Chilbo watershed
 Keywords
Dongjin River;Water quality;Pollutant loads;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
새만금 유역에서 토지 이용이 오염부하에 미치는 영향 평가,이덕배;김종천;이경보;김종구;박찬원;

한국토양비료학회지, 2006. vol.39. 4, pp.237-244
2.
수질성분 분포도를 이용한 서낙동강 수계 농업용수 수질평가,고지연;이재생;김춘송;정기열;최영대;윤을수;박성태;강항원;김복진;

한국환경농학회지, 2006. vol.25. 2, pp.138-146 crossref(new window)
3.
전북지역 농업용 하천유역의 수질과 부하량 특성,엄미정;문영훈;안병구;신용규;

한국환경농학회지, 2008. vol.27. 2, pp.111-119 crossref(new window)
4.
동진강의 이.화학적 수질 및 서식지 분석을 통한 어류 생태영향 평가,김유표;이의행;안광국;

생태와환경, 2009. vol.42. 2, pp.183-191
5.
새만금호 유입 하천 하상 퇴적물의 물리화학적 특성과 오염도 분석,오경희;유미나;조영철;

대한환경공학회지, 2011. vol.33. 12, pp.861-867 crossref(new window)
1.
Physicochemical water quality characteristics in relation to land use pattern and point sources in the basin of the Dongjin River and the ecological health assessments using a fish multi-metric model, Journal of Ecology and Environment, 2016, 40, 1  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Jain, C. K., Bhatia, K. K. S. and Seth, S.M. (1998) Assessment of point and non-point sources of pollution using a chemical mass balance approach, Hydrological Sciences, 43(3), 379-390 crossref(new window)

2.
Chesters, G. and Schierow, L.J. (1985) A primer on nonpoint pollution, Journal. of Soil & water conservation 40(1):9-13

3.
Osborne, L.L. Wiley, and M.J. (1988) Empirical relationship between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed, Journal. of Environmental Management 26:9-27

4.
Budd, W.W., Cohen, P.L., Saunders, P.R. and Steiner, F.R. (1987) Stream corridor management in the Pacific northwest: determination of stream corridor width, Environmental Management 11:587-597 crossref(new window)

5.
Charles, M.C. and William, M.L. (1992) Water quality and agriculture Mississippi experiences. J. of soil and water conservation, 47(3):220-223

6.
Ministry of Environ. (2000) The standard method of water analysis

7.
William Horwitz. 1980. Methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists. A.O.A.C: 550-552

8.
Ministry of Environ. (1999) Guideline of total pollutant to stream management

9.
Knox, E. and Moody. D.W. (1991) Influence of hydrology. soil properties, and agricultural land use on nitrogen in ground water. In managing nitrogen for ground water quality and farm profitability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.:19-57

10.
John, Cobourn and Sue. D. (1996) Water quality education for owners of small ranches. J. of soil and water conservation, 51(1):41-45