JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Runoff of Endosulfan by Rainfall Simulation and from Soybean-grown Field Lysimeter
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Runoff of Endosulfan by Rainfall Simulation and from Soybean-grown Field Lysimeter
Kim, Chan-Sub; Lee, Hee-Dong; Ihm, Yang-Bin; Im, Geon-Jae;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Three different experiments were carried out to investigate the runoff and erosion losses of endosulfan from sloped-field by rainfall. The mobility of endosulfan and which phase it was transported by were examined in adsorption study, the influence of rainfall pattern and slope degree on the pesticide loss were evaluated in simulated rainfall study, and the pesticide losses from soybean-grown field comparing with bare soil were measured in field lysimeter study. Adsorption parameter (K) of endosulfan ranged from 77 to 131 by adsorption method and K values by the desorption method were higher than those by the adsorption method. By the SSLRC's classification for pesticide mobility endosulfan was classified as non-mobile class ($K_{oc}>4,000$). Runoff and erosion loss of endosulfan by three rainfall scenarios ranged from 3.4 to 5.6%and from 4.4 to 15.6%of the amount treated. Endosulfan residues were mainly remained at the top 5 cm of soil depth after the simulated rainfall study. Pesticide loss in case of 30%-slope degree ranged from 0.6 to 0.9 times higher than those in case of 10%-slope degree. The difference of pesticide runoff loss was related with its concentration in runoff water and the difference of pesticide erosion loss would related closely with the quantity of soil eroded. Endosulfan losses from a series of lysimeter plots in sloped land by rainfall ranged from 5 to 35% of the amount treated. The erosion rate of endosulfan from soybean-plots was 66% of that from bare soil plots. The effect of slope conditions was not great for runoff loss, but was great for erosion loss as increasing to maximum times with slope degree and slope length. The peak runoff concentration of endosulfan in soybean-plots and bare soil plots ranged from 8 to 10 and from 7 to on nine plots with different slope degree and slope length. Therefore the difference of the peak runoff concentrations between bare soil plots and soybean-plots were not great.
 Keywords
runoff;erosion;adsorption;endosulfan;lysimeter;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
유기염소계 농약 endosulfan을 분해하는 미생물의 분리 및 분해 특성,신재호;곽윤영;김원찬;소재현;신현수;박종우;김태화;김장억;이인구;

한국환경농학회지, 2008. vol.27. 3, pp.292-297 crossref(new window)
2.
잔류농약 다성분 동시분석을 위한 기체 크로마토그래피 분석성능과 3종 분배용매에 의한 농약추출,김찬섭;김진배;임건재;박현주;이영득;

농약과학회지, 2009. vol.13. 3, pp.133-147
3.
토양 중 농약의 동태,이규승;

농약과학회지, 2010. vol.14. 3, pp.303-307
4.
Dichloromethane 분배 - 흡착 크로마토그래피 - GC-ECD/NPD 분석법에 의한 토양잔류농약 다성분 분석,김찬섭;이병무;박경훈;박병준;박재읍;이영득;

농약과학회지, 2010. vol.14. 4, pp.361-370
5.
고추재배 포장 라이시메타를 이용한 fluazinam의 유출 평가,김찬섭;임양빈;권혜영;임건재;

농약과학회지, 2013. vol.17. 4, pp.256-263 crossref(new window)
1.
Runoff of Fluazinam Applied in Pepper Field-lysimeter, The Korean Journal of Pesticide Science, 2013, 17, 4, 256  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Leonard, R. A. (1990) Movement of pesticides into surface waters, In Pesticides in the soil environment: processes, impacts and modeling. H. H. Cheng, (Ed.), Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. 303-349

2.
Kim, S. S., Kim, T. H., Lee, S. M., Park, D. S., Zhu, Y. Z. and Hur, J. H. (2005) Mobility of pesticides in different slopes and soil collected from Gangwon alpine sloped-land under simulated rainfall conditions. Korean J. Pestic. Sci. 9(4), 316-329

3.
Jury, W. A., Focht, D. D. and Farmer, W. J. (1987) Evaluation of pesticide groundwater pollution potential from standard indices of soil-chemical adsorption and biodegradation. J. Environ. Qual. 16, 422-428 crossref(new window)

4.
Boesten, J. J. T. I. and van der Linden, A. M. A. (1991) Modeling the influence of sorption and transformation on pesticide leaching and persistence. J. Environ. Qual. 20, 425-435 crossref(new window)

5.
Gustafson, D. I. (1989) Groundwater ubiquity score: A simple method for assessing pesticide leachability. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 8, 339-357 crossref(new window)

6.
Jarvis, N. J., Hollis, J. M., Nicholls, P. H., Mayer T. and Evans, S. P. (1997) MACRO_DB: A decisionsupport tool for assessing pesticide fate and mobility in soils. Environmental Modelling & Software 12, 251-265 crossref(new window)

7.
FOCUS (2004) FOCUS surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under 91/414/EEC. pp 294

8.
Moon, Y. H., Kim, Y. T., Kim, Y. S. and Han, S. K. (1993) Simulation and measurement of degradation and movement of insecticide ethoprophos in soil. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 12(3), 209-218

9.
Hyun, H. N., Oh, S. S. and Yoo, S. H. (1995) Adsorption and movement of alachlor and chlorothalonil in the representative soil of Cheju island. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 14(2), 135-143

10.
Kim, C. S., Lee, B. M., Ihm, Y. B. and Choi, J. H. (2002) Leaching potential of butachlor, ethoprophos, iprobenfos, isoprothiolane and proeymidone in soils as affected by adsorption characteristics. Korean J. Pestic. Sci. 6(4), 309-319

11.
Kim, C. S., Park, B. J., Ihm, Y. B. and Ryu, G. H. (2005) Adsorption characteristics of organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides in four soils and the evaluation for their leaching potential using two screening models. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 24(4), 341-349 crossref(new window)

12.
Kim, C. S., Park, K. H., Kim, J. B. and Choi, J. H. (2002) Leaching and mobility prediction of butachlor, ethoprophos, iprobenfos, isoprothiolane and procymidone in soils. Korean J. Pestic. Sci. 6(4), 300-308

13.
Kim, C. S., Ihm, Y. B., Lee, H. D. and Oh, B. Y. (2005) Leaching of organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides in soil column and prediction of their mobility using the convective mobility test model in soils. Korean J. Environ. Agrie. 24(4), 350-357 crossref(new window)

14.
Kim, K. (1997) Studies on pesticide runoff from soil surface by rainfall. Ph. D. Thesis, Seoul National University

15.
Kim, K., Kim, J. H. and Park, C. K. (1997) Pesticide runoff from soil surface by rainfall. Korean J. Environ. Agrie. 16(3), 274-284

16.
Korea Crop Protection Association. (2007) Agrochemicals year book

17.
Korea Crop Protection Association. (2007) Agrochemicals use guide book

18.
McCall, P. J., Swann, R. L., Laskowski, D. A., Unger, S. M., Vrona, S. A. and Dishburger, H. J. (1980) Estimation of chemical mobility in soil from liquid chromatographic retention times. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxieol. 24, 190-195 crossref(new window)

19.
Roberts, T. R. (1996) Assessing the environmental fate of agrochemicals. J. Environ. Sci. Health. B31, 325-335

20.
Wischmeier, W. H. and Smith, D. D. (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses - A guide to conservation planning. USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 537

21.
Tomlin, C. (ed.) (2003) The pesticide manual (13th ed.). British Crop Protection Council

22.
OECD. (1993) Test guideline 106 Adsorption/desorption. In OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals

23.
US EPA. (1994) Sediment and adsorption isotherm. In Code of federal regulation 40 part 790 to end, 157-161

24.
Kim, C. S., Ihm, Y. B., Lee, Y. D. and Oh, B. Y. (2006) Runoff and erosion of alachlor, ethalfluralin, ethoprophos and pendimethalin by rainfall simulation. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 25(4), 306-315 crossref(new window)

25.
US EPA. (2002) Reregistration eligibility decision for endosulfan. US EPA Doc No. 738-R-02-013