JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Identification of Pitfalls Related to the Analysis of Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Identification of Pitfalls Related to the Analysis of Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry
Kwon, Jin-Wook; Cho, Yoon-Jae; Rhee, Gyu-Seek;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
BACKGROUND: To identify the sources of inaccuracy in LC/MS/MS methods used in the routine quantitation of small molecules are described and discussed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Various UPLC coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometer and time of flight (TOF) were used to identify the potential sources of inaccuracy and inducing the pitfalls of qualification and quntitation during the veterinary drug residue analysis. Some of stable isotope labelled veterinary drugs, which were used as internal standards, presented "cross-talk", regardless of manufactures of mass spectrometer and types of spectrometer. Group of sulfonamides also presented inaccuracy qualification and quantitation due to the multi-residue analytical method with the same fragment ions at the close retention times. CONCLUSION: The phenomena of "cross-talk" occurring between subsequently monitored transition from stable isotope labelled and isotope non-labelled authentic chemical were identified. To prevent errors and achieve more accurate data during the analysis of small molecules by LC/MS/MS SRM method, Followings should be taken care of and kept checking; purity and concentration of stable isotope as an internal standard, prevention of carry-over during the separation in column, minimizing the ion suppression by matrix effect, identification of retention time, precursor ion and product ion, and full knowledge of data processing including smoothing and peak integration.
 Keywords
Cross-talk;Inaccuracy;LC/MS/MS;Selective reaction monitoring (SRM);
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
Semicarbazide (SEM): Natural occurrence and uncertain evidence for its formation from food processing, Food Control, 2016  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Anastassiades, M., Lehotay, S. J., Stajnbaher, D., & Schenck, F. J. (2003). Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and "dispersive solid-phase extraction" for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. Journal of AOAC International, 86(2), 412-431.

2.
Antignac, J. P., de Wasch, K., Monteau, F., De Brabander, H., Andre, F., & Le Bizec, B. (2005). The ion suppression phenomenon in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and its consequences in the field of residue analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta, 529(1), 129-136. crossref(new window)

3.
Berg, T., & Strand, D. H. (2011). $^{13}C$ labelled internal standards-A solution to minimize ion suppression effects in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analyses of drugs in biological samples?. Journal of Chromatography A, 1218(52), 9366-9374. crossref(new window)

4.
Ferrer, I., & Thurman, E. M. (2009). Liquid chromatography-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry: Principles, Tools and Applications for Accurate Mass Analysis. New York, NJ: Wiley, ISBN 978-0-470-13797-0.

5.
Gosetti, F., Mazzucco, E., Zampieri, D., & Gennaro, M. C. (2010). Signal suppression/enhancement in high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1217(25), 3929-3937. crossref(new window)

6.
Hughes, N. C., Wong, E. Y., Fan, J., & Bajaj, N. (2007). Determination of carryover and contamination for mass spectrometry-based chromatographic assays. The AAPS Journal, 9(3), E353-E360. crossref(new window)

7.
Nischwitz, V., & Pergantis, S. A. (2006). Optimisation of an HPLC selected reaction monitoring electrospray tandem mass spectrometry method for the detection of 50 arsenic species. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 21(11), 1277-1286. crossref(new window)

8.
Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. (1964). Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical Chemistry, 36(8), 1627-1639. crossref(new window)

9.
Song, F. (2011). "Cross-Talk" in Scheduled Multiple Reaction Monitoring Caused by In-Source Fragmentation in Herbicide Screening with Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(9), 4361-4364. crossref(new window)

10.
Van Eeckhaut, A., Lanckmans, K., Sarre, S., Smolders, I., & Michotte, Y. (2009). Validation of bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assays: evaluation of matrix effects. Journal of Chromatography B, 877(23), 2198-2207. crossref(new window)

11.
Wang, S., Cyronak, M., & Yang, E. (2007). Does a stable isotopically labeled internal standard always correct analyte response?: A matrix effect study on a LC/MS/MS method for the determination of carvedilol enantiomers in human plasma. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 43(2), 701-707. crossref(new window)