Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Influence of Processing on Morphology, Electrical Conductivity and Flexural Properties of Exfoliated Graphite Nanoplatelets-Polyamide Nanocomposites
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Carbon letters
  • Volume 11, Issue 4,  2010, pp.279-284
  • Publisher : Korean Carbon Society
  • DOI : 10.5714/CL.2010.11.4.279
 Title & Authors
Influence of Processing on Morphology, Electrical Conductivity and Flexural Properties of Exfoliated Graphite Nanoplatelets-Polyamide Nanocomposites
Liu, Wanjun; Do, In-Hwan; Fukushima, Hiroyuki; Drzal, Lawrence T.;
  PDF(new window)
Graphene is one of the most promising materials for many applications. It can be used in a variety of applications not only as a reinforcement material for polymer to obtain a combination of desirable mechanical, electrical, thermal, and barrier properties in the resulting nanocomposite but also as a component in energy storage, fuel cells, solar cells, sensors, and batteries. Recent research at Michigan State University has shown that it is possible to exfoliate natural graphite into graphite nanoplatelets composed entirely of stacks of graphene. The size of the platelets can be controlled from less than 10 nm in thickness and diameters of any size from sub-micron to 15 microns or greater. In this study we have investigated the influence of melt compounding processing on the physical properties of a polyamide 6 (PA6) nanocomposite reinforced with exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets (xGnP). The morphology, electrical conductivity, and mechanical properties of xGnP-PA6 nanocomposite were characterized with electrical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, AC impedance, and mechanical properties. It was found that counter rotation (CNR) twins crew processed xGnP/PA6 nanocomposite had similar mechanical properties with co-rotation (CoR) twin screw processed or with CoR conducted with a screw design modified for nanoparticles (MCoR). Microscopy showed that the CNR processed nanocomposite had better xGnP dispersion than the (CoR) twin screw processed and modified screw (MCoR) processed ones. It was also found that the CNR processed nanocomposite at a given xGnP content showed the lowest graphite X-ray diffraction peak at indicating better xGnP dispersion in the nanocomposite. In addition, it was also found that the electrical conductivity of the CNR processed 12 wt.% xGnP-PA6 nanocomposite is more than ten times higher than the CoR and MCoR processed ones. These results indicate that better dispersion of an xGnP-PA6 nanocomposite is attainable in CNR twins crew processing than conventional CoR processing.
Exfoliated graphite nanoplatelet;Polyamide;Nanocomposites;Electrical conductivity;Flexural property;
 Cited by
Preparation and Characterization of Reduced Graphene Nanosheets via Pre-exfoliation of Graphite Flakes,;;

Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 2012. vol.33. 1, pp.209-214 crossref(new window)
Bridge effect of carbon nanotubes on the electrical properties of expanded graphite/poly(ethylene terephthalate) nanocomposites,;;

Carbon letters, 2012. vol.13. 1, pp.51-55 crossref(new window)
Effect of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets on the fracture surface morphology and the electrical resistivity of phenylethynyl-terminated polyimide,;;;

Carbon letters, 2012. vol.13. 2, pp.121-125 crossref(new window)
Simultaneous Enhancement of Impact Toughness, Mechanical Properties and Thermo-dimensional Stability of Epoxy Composites by Rubber-coated Exfoliated Graphite Nanoplatelets,;;

Fibers and Polymers, 2013. vol.14. 11, pp.1947-1952 crossref(new window)
Giannelis, E. P. Appl. Organometalic Chem. 1998, 12, 675. crossref(new window)

Drzal, L. T.; Fukushima, H. "Expanded graphite, preparation of platelets, and nanocomposite products", Pat. Appl. Publ., U.S., 2004.

Drzal, L. T.; Fukushima, H. "Expanded graphite and products produced therefore", Pat. Appl. Publ., U.S., 2006.

Drzal, L. T.; Fukushima, H. Proc. 17th annual technical conference on American Society for Composites, 2002.

Yasmin, A.; Daniel, I. M. Polymer 2004, 45, 8211. crossref(new window)

Kalaitzidou, K.; Fukushima, H.; Drzal, L. T. Carbon 2007, 45, 1446. crossref(new window)

Fukushima, H.; Drzal, L. T.; Rook, B. P.; Rich, M. J. J. Therm. Anal. Calori. 2006, 85, 235. crossref(new window)

Miloaga, D. G.; Hosein, H. A.; Misra, M.; Drzal, L. T. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 106, 2548. crossref(new window)

Lu, J.; Drzal, L. T.; Worden, R. M.; Lee, I. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 6240. crossref(new window)

Pinnavaia, T. J.; Beall, G. W. "Polymer Clay Nanocomposites", John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 2000, Chap. 6.

Krishnamoorti, R. MRS Bulletin 2007, 32, 341. crossref(new window)

Hunter, D. L.; Karena, K. W.; Paul, D. R. MRS Bulletin 2007, 32,323. crossref(new window)

Ryu, S. H.; Chang, Y. W. Polymer Bulletin 2005, 55, 385. crossref(new window)

Gianelli, W.; Camino, G.; Dintcheva, N. T.; Verso, S. L.; Mantia, F. P. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2004, 289, 238. crossref(new window)

Dennis, H. R.; Hunter, D. L.; Chang, D.; Kim, S.; White, J. L.; Cho, J. W.; Paul, D. R. Polymer 2001, 42, 9513. crossref(new window)

Treece, M. A.; Zhang, W.; Moffit, R. D.; Oberhauser, J. P. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2007, 47, 898. crossref(new window)

Georga, R. E.; Cohen, R. E. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. 2004, 42, 2690. crossref(new window)

Fukushima, H. "Graphite Nanoreinforcements in Polymer Nanocomposites", Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A., 2003.