JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Economic Evaluations for the Carbon Dioxide-involved Production of High-value Chemicals
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Korean Chemical Engineering Research
  • Volume 52, Issue 3,  2014, pp.347-354
  • Publisher : The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers
  • DOI : 10.9713/kcer.2014.52.3.347
 Title & Authors
Economic Evaluations for the Carbon Dioxide-involved Production of High-value Chemicals
Lee, Ji Hyun; Lee, Dong Woog; Gyu, Jang Se; Kwak, No-Sang; Lee, In Young; Jang, Kyung Ryoung; Choi, Jong Shin; Shim, Jae-Goo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Economic evaluation of the manufacturing technology of high-value chemicals through the carbonation reaction of carbon dioxide contained in the flue gas was performed, and analysis of the IRR (Internal Rate of Return) and whole profit along the production plan of the final product was conducted. Through a carbonation reaction with sodium hydroxide that is generated from electrolysis and by using carbon dioxide in the combustion gas that is generated in the power plant, it is possible to get a high value products such as sodium bicarbonate compound and also to reduce the carbon dioxide emission simultaneously. The IRR (Internal Rate of Return) and NPV (Net Present Value) methods were used for the economic evaluation of the process which could handle carbon dioxide of 100 tons per day in the period of the 20 years of plant operation. The results of economic evaluation showed that the IRR of baseline case of technology was 67.2% and the profit that obtained during the whole operation period (20 years) was 346,922 million won based on NPV value. When considering ETS due to the emissions trading enforcement that will be activated in 2015, the NPV was improved to a 6,000 million won. Based on this results, it could be concluded that this carbonation technology is an cost-effective technology option for the reduction of greenhouse gas.
 Keywords
Capture;Chemical Absorption;Economic Evaluation; Carbonation;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
압력 순환 흡착과 막 분리공정을 이용한 다성분 기체의 분리공정 조업 최적화 및 경제성 평가,김한솔;이재욱;이수빈;한지훈;이인범;

Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 2015. vol.53. 1, pp.31-38 crossref(new window)
2.
NCCU(Non-Capture CO2 Utilization) 기술의 CO2 감축 잠재량 산정,이지현;이동욱;장세규;곽노상;이인영;장경룡;최종신;심재구;

Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 2015. vol.53. 5, pp.590-596 crossref(new window)
1.
Operating Optimization and Economic Evaluation of Multicomponent Gas Separation Process using Pressure Swing Adsorption and Membrane Process, Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 2015, 53, 1, 31  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Utilization (NCCU) Technology, Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 2015, 53, 5, 590  crossref(new windwow)
3.
Experimental study on capture of carbon dioxide and production of sodium bicarbonate from sodium hydroxide, Environmental Engineering Research, 2016, 21, 3, 297  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
http://www.tcmda.com/en.

2.
http://www.mhi.co.jp/en/news/story/1209141573.html.

3.
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/boundary_dam.html.

4.
Lee, J. H., Kwak, N.-S., Lee, I. Y., Jang, K. R., Jang S. G., Lee, K. J., Han, G. S., Oh, D.-H. and Shim, J.-G., "Test Bed Studies with Highly Efficient Amine $CO_2$ Solvent(KoSol-4)," Korean Chem. Eng. Res.(HWAHAK KONGHAK), 51(2), 267-271(2013). crossref(new window)

5.
http://skonic.com/skymine.

6.
http://www.twence.nl/en/actueel/Dossiers/Dossier Bicarbonate/120411 Producing sodium bicarbonate.docx/.

7.
Zaelke, et al. Scientific Synthesis of the Calera Sequestration of Carbon(2011).

8.
Jung, K.-D., "Mineralization using Brine Water," KIC News, 15(2), 25(2012).

9.
Huijgen, et al., "Cost Evaluation of $CO_2$ Sequestration by Aqueous Mineral Carbonation," EEnergy Convers. Manage., 48, 1923(2007). crossref(new window)

10.
Zevenhoven, et al., "A Study on MgO-based Mineral Carbonation Kinetics Using Pressurised Thermogravimetric Analysis," 8th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies(2006).

11.
Iizuka, et al., "Development of a New $CO_2$ Sequestration Process Utilizing the Carbonation of Waste Cement," Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43, 7880(2004). crossref(new window)

12.
Jerzy Chilstunoff, Advanced Chlor-Alkali Technology, DOE Award 03EE-2F/ED190403, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2004).

13.
IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, "Criteria for Technical and Economic Assessment of Plants with Low $CO_2$ Emissions," International Energy Agency ed., Gloucestershire, U.K.(2009).

14.
Lee, J. H., Kwak, N.-S., Lee, I. Y., Jang, K. R. and Shim, J.-G., "Performance and Economic Analysis of Domestic Supercritical Coal-Fired Power plant with Post-Combustion $CO_2$ capture Process," Korean Chem. Eng. Res.(HWAHAK KONGHAK), 50(2), 365-370(2012). crossref(new window)

15.
Bae, J. S., Hwang, I. S., Kweon, Y. J., Choi, Y. C., Park, S. J., Kim, H. J., Jung, H. and Han, C., "Economic Evaluations of Direct, Indirect and Hybrid Coal Liquefaction," Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(7), 868-875(2012). crossref(new window)

16.
Korea Development Institute, A study on standard guideline for pre-feasibility study, 5th edition, 181-213(2008).

17.
KEPCO, Electricity price table, 2013.11.21(2013).

18.
ChemLocus, Special Report, 2013.07.29(2013).

19.
The Korea Price Research Center, price list(2014).

20.
Hongin chemical, market report(2013).

21.
DOE, "DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record," (2012).

22.
Oceana Analysis of Memorandum on the Cost Effectiveness of Mercury-free Technology in the Chlor-Alkali sector(2009).

23.
Carbon market information, report(2013).