JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparison of Low Concentration and High Concentration Arsenic Removal Techniques and Evaluation of Concentration of Arsenic in Ground Water: A Case Study of Lahore, Pakistan
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Korean Chemical Engineering Research
  • Volume 52, Issue 5,  2014, pp.620-626
  • Publisher : The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers
  • DOI : 10.9713/kcer.2014.52.5.620
 Title & Authors
Comparison of Low Concentration and High Concentration Arsenic Removal Techniques and Evaluation of Concentration of Arsenic in Ground Water: A Case Study of Lahore, Pakistan
Yasar, Abdullah; Tabinda, Amtul Bari; Shahzadi, Uzma; Saleem, Pakeeza;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The main focus of this study was the evaluation of arsenic concentration in the ground water of Lahore at different depth and application of different mitigation techniques for arsenic removal. Twenty four hours of solar oxidation gives 90% of arsenic removal as compared to 8 hr. or 16 hr. Among oxides, calcium oxide gives 96% of As removal as compared to 93% by lanthanum oxide. Arsenic removal efficiency was up to 97% by ferric chloride, whereas 95% by alum. Activated alumina showed 99% removal as compared to 97% and 95% removal with bauxite and charcoal, respectively. Elemental analysis of adsorbents showed that the presence of phosphate and silica can cause a reduction of arsenic removal efficiency by activated alumina, bauxite and charcoal. This study has laid a foundation for further research on arsenic in the city of Lahore and has also provided suitable techniques for arsenic removal.
 Keywords
Coagulants;Activated Alumina;Calcium Oxide;Solar Oxidation;Elemental Analysis;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Análise da estrutura geológica e fatores antropológicos afetando a distribuição de arsênico no aquífero Lahore, Paquistão, Hydrogeology Journal, 2016, 24, 7, 1891  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Rising level of arsenic in water and fodder: a growing threat to livestock and human populations in Pakistan, Toxin Reviews, 2017, 1556-9551, 1  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Tyrovola, K., Kibriya, E., Slavkovich, M. G., Jasmine, F., Gamble, M. V. and Graziano, J. H., Eur. J. Soil Biol., 43, 356 (2007). crossref(new window)

2.
Ahsan, H., Chen, Y., Kibriya, M. G., Slavkovich, V., Parves, F., Jasmine, F., Gamble, M. V. and Graziano, J. H., Canc. Drug Del., 16(6), 1270 (2007).

3.
Malay, G. K., Gerrard, P. J. E., Touma, I. B. and Pritam, S., Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(1), 95 (2012). crossref(new window)

4.
Mukherjee, A. B. and Bhattacharya, P., Environ. Rev. 9, 189 (2001). crossref(new window)

5.
Mohan, D. and Pittman Jr, C. U., J. Hazard. Mater., 142, 1 (2007). crossref(new window)

6.
Ravenscroft, P., Brammer, H. and Richards, K., Arsenic Pollution: A Global Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons. Publication, 94 (2011).

7.
WHO (World Health Organization), Guideline for Drinking Water Quality, Recommendations, 3rd ed. Geneva, 306 (2004).

8.
Sahu, N. K., Barsha, D., Suchismita, S., Bhattacharya, I. N. and Subbaiah, T., Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(11), 1638 (2012). crossref(new window)

9.
Mondal, P., Majumder, C. and Mohanty, B., J. Hazar. Mater., 137(1), 464 (2006). crossref(new window)

10.
Stanton, M., Sanzolone, R., Grimes, D. and Sutley, S., In: Bartolino, J.R., (Ed.), US Geological Survey Middle Rio Grande Basin Study - Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop; US Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-203, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 62 (1999).

11.
Kapaj, S., Peterson, H., Liber, K. and Bhattacharya, P., J. Environ. Sci. Heal. A, 41, 2428 (2006).

12.
Choong, J., Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(3), 813 (2011). crossref(new window)

13.
Nickson, R. T., McArthur, J. M., Shrestha, B., Kyaw-Myint, T. O. and Lowry, D. Appl. Geochem., 20, 55 (2005). crossref(new window)

14.
Keon, N. E., Swartz, C. H., Brabander, D. J., Harvey, C. and Hemond, H. F., Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 2778 (2001). crossref(new window)

15.
Wegelin, M., Gechter, D., Hug, S., Mahmud, A. and Motaleb, A., SORAS-a Simple Arsenic Removal Process, http://phys4.harvard. edu/wilson/mitigation/SORAS Paper.html (2000).

16.
Hug, S. J., Canonica, L., Wegelin, M., Gechter, D. and von Gunten, U., Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 2114 (2001). crossref(new window)

17.
Lara, A. M. G. and Ocampo, C. M., Water Air Soil Poll., 205, 237 (2010). crossref(new window)

18.
Gholikandi, G. B., Orumieh, H. R. and Riahi, R., Int. J. Safe. Security Eng., 1(3), 326 (2011). crossref(new window)

19.
Tokunaga, S., Yokoyama, S. and Wasay, S. A., Water Environ. Res., 71(3), 299 (1999). crossref(new window)

20.
Edwards, M., J. Am. Water Work. Assoc., 86(9), 64 (1994).

21.
Neil, L. M. and Edwards, M., J. Am. Water Work. Assoc., 89(1), 75 (1997).

22.
Singh, P., Singh, S. T. and Pant, K. K., Res. J. Chem. Environ., 5(3), (2001).

23.
Debasish, M., Debaraj, M. and Ho, P. K., J. Environ. Sci., 20(6), 683 (2008). crossref(new window)

24.
Mondal, P., Balomajumder, C. and Mohanty, B., J. Hazard. Mater., 144, 420 (2007). crossref(new window)

25.
Leist, M., Casey, R. J. and Caridi, D., J. Hazard. Mater., 76(1), 125 (2000). crossref(new window)

26.
Meng, X., Bang, S. and Korfiatis, G. P., Water Res., 34, 1255 (2000). crossref(new window)