JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Safety Enhancement of LPG Terminal by LOPA & SIF Method
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Korean Chemical Engineering Research
  • Volume 53, Issue 4,  2015, pp.431-439
  • Publisher : The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers
  • DOI : 10.9713/kcer.2015.53.4.431
 Title & Authors
Safety Enhancement of LPG Terminal by LOPA & SIF Method
Lee, Il Jae; Kim, Rae Hyun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The methods which decrease the accident hazards of LPG(Liquefied Petroleum Gas) terminal on the basis of butane & propane storage tanks by applying HAZOP(Hazard and Operability), LOPA(Layer of Protection Analysis) and SIL(Safety Integrity Level) are suggested. The accident scenarios were derived by analyzing latent risks through the HAZOP. The scenarios which would have the big damage effect in accidents were selected and then LOPA was assessed by analyzing IPL(Independent Protection Layer) about the correspond accident scenarios. The improved methods were proposed on the basis of level of SIF(Safety Instrumented Functions) as a IPL considering satisfied condition of risk tolerance criteria(). In addition, The proposed IPLs were basis on the economic analysis. The effect of SIF as a IPL considering the changes of accident frequency was studied in case of the accident scenarios derived from the concerned process.
 Keywords
LPG Terminal;HAZOP;LOPA;SIF;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
추진시험설비의 사고피해영향분석 및 리스크 감소방안,신안태;변헌수;

Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 2016. vol.54. 3, pp.360-366 crossref(new window)
2.
염산취급시설의 사고시 사업장외에 미치는 영향평가,박교식;

Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 2016. vol.54. 6, pp.781-785 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Kim, J. H., "Safety Enhancement of Chemical Process using SIL Method," M. S. (2010).

2.
Center for Chemical Process Safety, CCPS, "Guidelines for Hazard Evalution Process," NewYork, 1-380(1989).

3.
Center for Chemical Process Safety, CCPS, "Layer of Protection Analysis," NewYork, 1-258(2001).

4.
International Electrotechnical Commision, IEC, "Functional Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry," IEC61508(2003).

5.
"A" Company, "Technical Data for LPG Terminal Operation," (2013).

6.
Instrumentation & Systems and Automation Society, SA "Safety Integrity Level Selection," North Carolina, 1-244(2002).

7.
Dowell, A. M., "Layer of Protection Analysis and Inherently Safer Process," 1-220(1999).

8.
Instrumentation & Systems and Automation Society, ISA, "Application of Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industries," ANSI/ISA-84.02, North Carolina(1996).

9.
Center for Chemical Process Safety, CCPS, "Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis," NewYork, 267-276(2000).

10.
Crowl & Louvar, "Chemical Process Safety-Fundmentals with Applications," Prentice Hall PTR, NJ, 448-454(2002).

11.
SINTEF Industrial Management, "OREDA: Offshore Reliability Data," Trondheim, Norway(2002).

12.
Center for Chemical Process Safety, CCPS "Guidelines for Process Equioment Reliability Data," NewYork(1989).

13.
Reliability Information Analysis Center, RICA "Nonelectronic Parts Reliability Data," (1996).

14.
ABS Consulting, PSI, "Layor of Protection Analysis," TN(2003).

15.
Roodbol, H. G., "Risk Analysis of Six Potentially Hazardous Industrial Object in the Rijnmond Area, A Pilot Study," (1982).

16.
Marszal, E. M., Fuller, B. A. and Shah, J. N., "Comparison of Safety Integrity Level Selection Methods and Utilization of Risk Based Approaches," Process Safety Progress, 18(4), 189-194(1999). crossref(new window)

17.
Chae, D. J., "Paradigm of Domestic Gas Development," M.S. (2003).