JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Trends of Post-fire Forest Recovery in the South Sikhote-Alin Mountains, Russian Far East
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Trends of Post-fire Forest Recovery in the South Sikhote-Alin Mountains, Russian Far East
Komarova, Tatiana A.; Sibirina, L.A.; Papaik, M.J.; Park, J.H.; Kang, HoSang;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
To understand natural regeneration and stand development after fire in mixed broadleaved-coniferous forests of Sikhote-Alin Mountains, ten sample plots of size were established in 1975 and 1983 at the stands burned by wildfires in 1973 and 1982, respectively. And, the number of naturally regenerated seedlings were monitored in two subplots in each plot. The most fire-sensitive conifer species is Abies nephrolepis, while Betula costata is the most fire-sensitive broadleaved tree species. The most fire-resistant species were Q. mongolica, T. taquetii and A. mono. The results of 20 and 30 years after the fire showed that pioneer tree species, e.g. Populus, Salix, and Betula, were regenerated immediately at the early stage of stand development and grew where there is a mono canopy layer with high density. On the other hand, the densities of successors, e.g. Pinus koraiensis, Picea jezoensis, Abies nephrolepis, Acer mono and Tilia taquetii, which were present in the study plots before the fire, increased gradually. Naturally regenerated tree species after forest fire by the growth rate were divided into three groups according to their annual height growth. The seral tree species (Betula costata, Betula platyphylla, Padus maackii, Populus tremula and Sarix caprea) belong to the first group and have the highest growth rate (from 40 to 96 cm per year). The late successional broad-leaved trees (Tilia taquetii, Acer mono and Quercus mongolica) belong to the second group and have intermediate annual height growth (from 3.7 to 13.5 cm per year). The late successional coniferous species (Picea jezoensis, Pinus koraiensis and Abies nephrolepis) form the third group and have the least annual height growth (from 1.4 to 3.5 cm per year).
 Keywords
forest fire;Russian Far East;natural regeneration;fire-sensitive species;fire-resistant species;forest succession;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Agee, J. K. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Island Press:Washington D.C.

2.
Clements F. E. 1928. Plant succession and indicators. Wilson:New York.

3.
Clements F. E. 1949. The dynamics of vegetation. New York.

4.
Sheingauz A. A. 2004. Forest fire management in high biodiversity value forests of the Amur-Sikhote-Alin ecoregion:Scientifictechnical basis of the project. Khabarovsk, Printing-house "ZhASO-Amur".

5.
Guyette, R. P. and Spetich, M. A. 2003. Fire history of oak-pine forests in the Lower Boston Mountains, Arkansas, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 180:463-474. crossref(new window)

6.
Kolesnikov B. P. 1956. Korean pine forests of the Far East. AS USSR:M.L. (in Russian)

7.
Komarova, T. A. 1992. Post-fire succession in the forests of South Sikhote-Alin Mountains, Vladivostok:FEB RAS. (In Russian).

8.
Komarova, T. A.․Sibirina, L. A.․Lee, D. K. and Kang, H. S. 2005. Decomposition of trees after fires in Korean pine forest of the South Sikhote-Alin Mountains. In.:International symposium on ecological conservation and sustainable development of forest resources in Northeast Asia. Yanji, China. pp. 76-77

9.
Mishkov, F. F. and Starodumov, A. M. 1982. Post-fire regenerative changes in Korean pine forests. In:Forest regeneration in mountain forests of the Far East. Khabarovsk. p. 27-34. (In Russian).

10.
Pyne, S. J. 1995. World fire:The culture of fire on earth.

11.
Sheshukov, M. A. 1967. Classification of forest fires on size of the burned out area. Forest regeneration.1, 53-57. (In Russian).

12.
Sheshukov, M. A.․Soloviev, K. P. and Naikrug, I. B. 1978. Influence of various factors on damageability of standing timbers and tree species by fire. In:Usage and reproduction of woody resources of Far East. Khabarovsk, pp. 145-150. (In Russian).

13.
Shumway, D. L.․Abrams, M. L. and Ruffner, C. M. 2001. A 400-year history of fire and oak recruitment in an old-growth oak forest in western Maryland, USA. Can. J. For. Res. 31, 1437-1443. crossref(new window)

14.
Soloduchin, E. D. 1952. Forest regeneration in some types of forest within Primorski territory. Communication of FEB SO USSR AS. 5, 43-53. (In Russian).

15.
Soloduchin, E. D. 1954. Natural forest regeneration on clearing and burned stand in fir-spruce forest of the Far East. Forest regeneration.11, 40-42. (In Russian).

16.
Starodumov, A. M. 1966. Character of forest fires on the Far East. Forest industry. pp. 58 (In Russian).

17.
Starodumov, A. M., Tsibukov, В. N. 1969. Effect of forest fire on the decomposition of trees in larch forests of Khabarovski territory. Forest regeneration, 10, 60-63. (In Russian).

18.
Sverlova L. I.․Kostyrina, T. V. 1985. Droughts and forest fires on the Far East. Khabarovsk. pp. 118.

19.
Vascular plants of the Soviet Far East. Science. 1985-1996. Vol.1-8. (In Russian).