JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on Metadata Ontology Design for Record Management Based on IPAM Model
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on Metadata Ontology Design for Record Management Based on IPAM Model
Park, Heejin; Park, Oknam;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The study aims to present authenticity ontology required for capturing information about digital record`s identity and integrity over the course of the lifecycle. To this end, we analyzed the functional requirements, domain model, and sample properties of the IPAM (InterPARES Authenticity Metadata), Based on IPAM, we proposed an ontology for authenticity of digital records with sample records. The suggested ontology modeling can be utilized as the basis for establishing an authenticity information creation and management tool for digital records.
 Keywords
InterPARES;IPAM;metadata;ISO 23081;authenticity;ontology;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
강인수, 정한민, 이승우, 김평, 이미경, 성원경 (2007). 시맨틱 웹 온톨로지에서의 OWL sameAs 적용. 정보과학회논문지, 34(4), 359-367.(Kang, Insu, Jung, Hanmin, Lee, Seungwoo, Kim, Pyung, Lee, Mikyung, & Sung, Wonkyung (2007). Applying OWL SameAs to an Ontology in the Semantic Web. Journal of Korean Information Science, 34(4), 359-367.)

2.
고영만, 서태설, 임태훈 (2007). 의미호환을 위한 메타데이터 매핑 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(4), 223-238.(Ko, Young Man, Seo, Tae-Sul, & Lim, Tae-Hoon (2007). A Study on Metadata Mapping for Semantic Interoperability. Journal of Korea Society for Information Management, 24(4), 223-238.)

3.
국가기록원 (2007). 전자기록의 관리와 보존을 위한 국제협력 아젠다 개발. 서울: 국가기록원.(National Archives of Korea (2007). International Cooperation Agenda for Management and Preservation of Electronic Records. Seoul: National Archives of Korea.)

4.
김장환, 이은별 (2015). 국회기록정보 통합관리시스템 개발 방향에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 15(2), 103-136.(Kim, Jang-hwan & Lee, Eun Byol (2015). A Study on the Development of the National Assembly Archives and Records Management System. Journal of Records Management & Archives Society of Korea, 15(2), 103-136.)

5.
김종우, 김형도, 윤정희, 정현철 (2007). 기업간 비즈니스 프로세스 등록저장소를 위한 메타데이터 온톨로지 설계. 정보처리학회지, 14(4), 435-446.(Kim, Jongwoo, Kim, Hyungdo, Youn, Junghee, & Jung, Hyunchul (2007). Metadata Ontology Design for B2B Business Process Registries. Journal of Korean Information Processing Society, 14(4), 435-446.)

6.
문주영, 김태수 (2011). PREMIS 데이터모델 적용을 위한 사무문서 컨텐츠모형 설계 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 43-68.(Moon, Juyong & Kim, Taesoo (2011). A Study on Contents Model for Business Records by the PREMIS Data Model. Journal of Korea Society for Information Management, 28(1), 43-68.)

7.
백지은, 스키모토 시게오 (2012). 메타데이터 상호운용성을 위한 기록관리 메타데이터 표준 분석. 기록학연구, 32, 127-176.(Baek, Jae-Eun & Shigeo Sugimoto (2012). Analyis of Metadata Standards of Record Management for Metadata Interoperbility. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 32, 127-176.)

8.
이정연, 김정민, 최석두, 김이겸 (2007). 기초학문자료 메타데이터 설계 분석 및 온톨로지 적용 방안 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(2), 291-316.(Lee, Jung-Yeoun, Kim, Jung-Min, Choi, Suk-Doo, & Kim, Lee-Kyum (2007). A Study on Design and Analysis of Metadata and Ontology based on Humanities and Social Sciences. Journal of Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(2), 291-316.)

9.
이주연 (2010). 다중 개체 모형을 적용한 기록관리 메타데이터 표준 사례분석. 한국기록관리학회지, 10(2), 193-214.(Lee, Ju-Yeon (2010). A Case Study on Recordkeeping Metadata Standard Applying Multiple Entities. Journal of Records Management & Archives Society of Korea, 10(2), 193-214.)

10.
이지영, 김희정 (2009). 디지털이미지 기록관리를 위한 메타데이터 요소 연구. 정보관리연구, 40(4), 49-71.(Lee, Ji-Young & Kim, Hee-Jung (2009). A Study on Metadata Elements for Digital Image Records Management. Journal of Information Management, 40(4), 49-71.)

11.
정희선, 김희순, 송현숙, 이명희 (2013). 종교유적 건축물 정보의 메타데이터 구성과 온톨로지 구축. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 44(1), 5-26.(Chung, Heesun, Kim, Heesoon, Song, Hyun-Sook, & Lee, Myeong-Hee (2013). Construction of Metadata Format and Ontology for Religious architecture heritage Information. Journal of Korea Library and Information Science Society, 44(1), 5-26.)

12.
최상미, 리상용 (2007). 현용전자기록물의 메타데이터 요소에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 7(1), 39-60.(Choi, Sang-Mi & Lee, Sang-Young (2007). A Study on the Elements of Current Electronic Records. Journal of Records Management & Archives Society of Korea, 7(1), 39-60.)

13.
Chen, Miao & Beth Plale (2012). From metadata to ontology representation: A case of converting severe weather forecast metadata to an ontology. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1-4.

14.
DLF Forum (2010). Modular Requirements for Records System (MoReq 2010). Retrieved October 14, 2015, from http://moreq2010.eu/pdf/MoReq2010-Core+Plugin(v1-0).pdf

15.
ISO (2001). ISO 15489-1: 2001. Information and documentation -- Records management -- Part 1: General.

16.
ISO (2006). ISO 23081-1: 2006. Information and Documentation -Records management Precesses - Metadata for Records. Part 1: Principles.

17.
ISO (2009). ISO 23081-2: 2009. Information and Documentation -Records management Precesses - Metadata for Records. Part 2: Concpetaul and Implementation Issues.

18.
Qin, Jian & Paling, Stephen (2001). Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology: the case of GEM. Information Research, 6(2), Retrieved October 14, 2015, from http://InformationR.net/ir/6-2/paper94.html

19.
Sini, M., Salokhe, G., Pardy, C., Albert, J., Keizer, J., & Katz, S. (2007, July). Ontology-based navigation of bibliographic metadata: example of the Food, Nutrition and Agriculture Journal. Paper presented at the International Conference on Solid Dielectrics, Winchester, Hampshire UK.

20.
Tennis, J. T. & Rogers, C. (2012). Authenticity Metadata and the IPAM: Progress toward the InterPARES Application Profile. In International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Metadata for Meeting Global Challenges. pp. 38-45.

21.
The InterPARES 3 Project (2012). General Study 15: Application Profile for Authenticity Metadata. Retrieved October 14, 2015, from http://www.interpares.org/display_file.cfm?doc=ip3_canada_gs15_final_report_v2.doc