JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Optimization of Acetic Acid Recovery Using Tri-n-alkylphosphine Oxide from Prepulping Extract of Hemicellulose by Response Surface Methodology
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Optimization of Acetic Acid Recovery Using Tri-n-alkylphosphine Oxide from Prepulping Extract of Hemicellulose by Response Surface Methodology
Kim, Seong Ju; Park, Seong-Jik; Um, Byung Hwan;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
A single process using hot water (0% green liquor) and green liquor (GL) was investigated for pre-pulping extraction on two types of raw material. The GL was applied at different alkali charges of 0-5% on a dry wood weight basis. The extractions were performed at an H-factor 900 at . The 0% and 3% GL extraction detected acetic acid (AA) at 10.02 and , extracts derived from hardwood, 2.46 and , extracts derived from softwood, respectively. The single liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) was studied using tri-n-alkylphosphine oxide (TAPO). Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed as an efficient approach for predictive model building and optimization of AA recovery conditions. The extraction of AA was evaluated with a three-level factorial design. Three independent variables, pH (0.5-3.5), temperature (), and residence time (24-48 min) were investigated. Applying the RSM models obtained, the optimal conditions selected of extracts derived from hard- and softwood with a 3% GL were approximately pH 1.4, , 43.8 min and approximately pH 0.7, , 24.6 min, respectively. The predicted and experimental values of AA recovery yield were similar whilst sugar retention was 100%.
 Keywords
acetic acid;response surface methodology;tri-n-alkylphosphine oxide;prepulping;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Amidon, T.E. 2006. The biorefinery in New York: woody biomass into commercial ethanol. Pulp & Paper Canada 107(6): 47-50.

2.
Amidon, T.E., Liu, S. 2009. Water-based woody biorefinery. Biotechnology Advances 27(5): 542-550. crossref(new window)

3.
Anasthas, H.M., Gaikar, V.G. 2001. Removal of acetic acid impurities from ethyl acetate by adsorption on ion exchange resins. Separation Science and Technology 36: 2623-2646. crossref(new window)

4.
Chen, M.J., Chen, K.N., Lin, C.W. 2005. Optimization on response surface models for the optimal manufacturing conditions of dairy tofu. Journal of Food Engineering 68(4): 471-80. crossref(new window)

5.
Fengel, D., Wegener, G. 1989. Wood-Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.

6.
Hsieh, C.S., Liou, T.S. 2001. Analysis of Orthogonal Array Experiments Using the Multivariate Orthogonal Regression Method. Quality Engineering 13(3): 449-455. crossref(new window)

7.
Karacan, F., Ozden, U., Karacan, S. 2007. Optimization of manufacturing conditions for activated carbon from Turkish lignite by chemical activation using response surface methodology. Applied Thermal Engineering 27(7): 1212-1218. crossref(new window)

8.
Keenan, T.M., Tanenbaum, S.W., Stipanovic, A.J., Nakas, J.P. 2004. Production and Characterization of Poly-beta-hydroxyalkanoate Copolymers from Burkholderia cepacia Grown on Xylose and Levulinic Acid. Biotechnology Progress 20: 1697-1704. crossref(new window)

9.
Kim, S.J., Kwon, H.S., Kim, G.H., Um, B.H. 2015. Green liquor extraction of hemicellulosic fraction and subsequent organic acid recovery from the extracts using liquid-liquid extraction. Industrial Crop and Products. 67: 395-402. crossref(new window)

10.
Kirschner, M. 2003. In Chemical Market Reporter.

11.
Klinke, H.B., Thomsen, A.B., Ahring, B.K. 2004. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 66: 10-26. crossref(new window)

12.
Liu, B., Romaire, R.P.D., Elaune, R.D., Linadau, C.E. 2006. Field investigation on the toxicity of Alaska North Slope crude oil and dispersed ANSC crude to Gulf Killifish, Eastern Oyster and white shrimp. Chemistry 62: 520-526.

13.
Lohmeier-Vogel, E.M., Sopher, C.R., Lee, H. 1998. Intracellular acidification as a mechanism for the inhibition by acid hydrolysis-derived inhibitors of xylose fermentation by yeasts. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 20: 75-81. crossref(new window)

14.
Ma, H., Liu, W.W., Chen, X., Wu, Y.J., Yu, Z.L. 2009 Enhanced enzymatic saccharification of rice straw by microwave pretreatment. Bioresource Technology 100(3): 1279-1284. crossref(new window)

15.
Madane, Namdev, S. 2013. Extraction studies of some Lanthanide and Actinides using Cyanex and Crown Ethers (http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/10067).

16.
Mao, H., Genco, J., van Heiningen, A., Pendse, H. 2008. Technical economic evaluation of a hardwood biorefinery using the 'near-neutral' hemicellulose pre-extraction process. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy 2: 1-9. crossref(new window)

17.
Morgenthaler, S., Schumacher, M.M. 1999. Robust analysis of a response surface design. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 47: 127-141. crossref(new window)

18.
Myerly, R.C., Nicholson, M.D., Katzen, R., Taylor, J.M. 1981. The forestry refinery. Chemtech 11(3): 186-192.

19.
Um, B.H., Friedman, B., van Walsum, G.P. 2011. Conditioning hardwood-derived pre-pulping extracts for use in fermentation through removal and recovery of acetic acid using trioctyl phosphine oxide (TOPO). Holzforschung 65(1): 51-58.

20.
van Heiningen. 2006. A. Converting a Kraft pulp mill into an integrated forest biorefinery. Pulp Paper Canada 107(6): 38-43.

21.
Wiencek, J.M., Qutubuddin, S. 1992. Microemulsion Liquid Membranes. 1 Application to acetic acid removal from water. Separation Science and Technology 27: 1211-1228. crossref(new window)

22.
Xu, Z.P., Afacan, A., Chuang, D.T. 1999. Removal of acetic acid from water by catalytic distillation. Part 1. Experimental studies. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 77: 676-681.

23.
Yue, Z.B., Yu, H.Q., Hu, Z.H., Harada, H., Li, Y.Y. 2008. Surfactant-enhanced anaerobic acidogenesis of Canna indica L. by rumen cultures. Bioresource Technology 99(9): 3418. crossref(new window)