JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Automatic Estimation of Artemia Hatching Rate Using an Object Discrimination Method
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Ocean and Polar Research
  • Volume 35, Issue 3,  2013, pp.239-247
  • Publisher : Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology
  • DOI : 10.4217/OPR.2013.35.3.239
 Title & Authors
Automatic Estimation of Artemia Hatching Rate Using an Object Discrimination Method
Kim, Sung; Cho, Hong-Yeon;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Digital image processing is a process to analyze a large volume of information on digital images. In this study, Artemia hatching rate was measured by automatically classifying and counting cysts and larvae based on color imaging data from cyst hatching experiments using an image processing technique. The Artemia hatching rate estimation consists of a series of processes; a step to convert the scanned image data to a binary image data, a process to detect objects and to extract their shape information in the converted image data, an analysis step to choose an optimal discriminant function, and a step to recognize and classify the objects using the function. The function to classify Artemia cysts and larvae is optimally estimated based on the classification performance using the areas and the plan-form factors of the detected objects. The hatching rate using the image data obtained under the different experimental conditions was estimated in the range of 34-48%. It was shown that the maximum difference is about 19.7% and the average root-mean squared difference is about 10.9% as the difference between the results using an automatic counting (this study) and a manual counting were compared. This technique can be applied to biological specimen analysis using similar imaging information.
 Keywords
Artemia;cyst and larvae;hatching rate;image analysis;discriminant analysis;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Arasan S, Hasiloglu AS, Akbulut S (2010) Shape properties of natural and crushed aggregate using image analysis. Int J Eng Res Appl 1(2):221-227

2.
Bates MC, Tiersch TR (1997) Low-cost computer-assisted image analysis for fisheries research. Prog Fish Cult 59(3):235-240 crossref(new window)

3.
Baxes GA (1984) Digital image processing: A Practical Primer. Cascade Press, New Jersey, 182 p

4.
Been TH, Meijer EMJ, Beniers AE, Knol JW (1996) Using image analysis for counting larvae of potato cyst nematodes (Globodera spp.). Fund Appl Nematol 19(3):297-304

5.
Brillon S, Lambert Y, Dodson J (2005) Egg survival, embryonic development, and larvae characteristics of northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) females object to different temperature and feeding conditions. Mar Biol 147:895-911 crossref(new window)

6.
Brix KV, Gerdes RM, Adams WJ, Grosell M (2006) Effects of copper, cadmium, and zinc on the hatching success of brine shrimp (Artermia franciscana). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 51:580-583 crossref(new window)

7.
Brown LM, Gargantini I, Brown DJ, Atkinson HJ, Govindarajan J, Vanlerberghe GC (1989) Compter-based image analysis for the automated counting and morphological description of microalgae in culture. J Appl Phycol 1:211-225 crossref(new window)

8.
Cadrin SX, Friedland KD (1999) The utility of image processing techniques for morphometric analysis and stock identification. Fish Res 43:129-139 crossref(new window)

9.
Friedland KD, Ama-Abasi D, Manning M, Clarke L, Kligys G, Chambers RC (2005) Automated egg counting and sizing from scanned images: Rapid sample processing and large data volumes for fecundity estimates. J Sea Res 54:307-316 crossref(new window)

10.
Gonzalez RC, Wintz P (1987) Digital image processing. Second Edition. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Tokyo, 503 p

11.
Hu J, Stroeven P (2006) Shape characterization of concrete aggregate. Acta Stereol 25:43-53

12.
Imasogie BI, Wendt U (2004) Characterization of graphite particle shape in spheroidal graphite iron using a computer-based image analyzer. J Mineral Mater Charact Eng 3(1):1-12

13.
Jiao L, Liu Y, Li H (2012) Characterizing land-use classes in remote sensing imagery by shape metrics. ISPRS J Photogramm 72:46-55 crossref(new window)

14.
Kim BO, Cho HY (2005) Image processing for video images of buoy motion. Ocean Sci J 40(4):213-220 crossref(new window)

15.
Kim BO, Cho HY, Lim DI, Yoon GS, Oh IS, Park YA (2008) Nearshore wave measurement using single-video images of buoy motions. J Coastal Res 24(6):1481-1486

16.
Letcher BH, Bengston A (1993) Effects of food density on growth and on patterns of prey depletion by larvae silverside fish, Menidia beryllina (Cope); a laboratory investigation with image analysis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 167:197-213 crossref(new window)

17.
MathWorks (2012) Image processing toolboxTM User's Guide. The MathWorks, Inc. Natick, Massachusetts, 596 p

18.
Onocha PA, Oloyede GK, Olasunkanmi GS (2011) Chemical composition, brine shrimp toxicity and free-radical scavenging activity of leaf essential oil of Acalypha Ornata (Hochst). Adv Environ Biol 5:188-193

19.
Rhee PK (2005) Image processing and biometric recognition (In Korean). Hongneung Science Pub., Seoul, 256 p

20.
Rideout RM, Trippel EA, Litvak MK (2005) Effects of egg size, food supply and spawning time on early life history success of haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 285:169-180 crossref(new window)

21.
Salma U, Uddowla MH, Lee G, Yeo Y, Kim HW (2012) Effects of pH change by CO2 induction and salinity on the hatching rate of Artemia franciscana. Fish Aquat Sci 15(2):177-181

22.
Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R (1999) Image processing, analysis, and machine vision. Second Edition. PWS Publishing, Pacific Grove, 770 p

23.
Storbeck F, Daan B (2001) Fish species recognition using computer vision and a neural network. Fish Res 51:11-15 crossref(new window)

24.
Thorsen A, Kjesbu OS (2001) A rapid method for estimation of oocyte size and potential fecundity in Atlantic cod using a computer-aided particle analysis system. J Sea Res 46:295-308 crossref(new window)

25.
Treece GD (2000) Artemia production for marine larvae fish culture. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center, SPAC Publication No. 702, 4 p

26.
Tsuji T, Nishikawa T (1984) Automated identification of red tide phytoplankton Prorocentrum triestinum in coastal areas by image analysis. J Ocean Soc Jap 40:425-431 crossref(new window)

27.
Wu J, Jones KB, Li H, Loucks OL (2006) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology: methods and applications. Springer, 352 p

28.
Zorica B, Sinovcic G, Cikes Kec V (2010) Preliminary data on the study of otolith morphology of five pelagic fish species from the Adriatic Sea (Croatia). Acta Adriat 51(1):89-96