JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Study on the Dispute for the Dominium of Diàoyútái(Senkaku Islands) and Legal Principles between the Countries Concerned
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Ocean and Polar Research
  • Volume 36, Issue 3,  2014, pp.255-276
  • Publisher : Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology
  • DOI : 10.4217/OPR.2014.36.3.255
 Title & Authors
Study on the Dispute for the Dominium of Diàoyútái(Senkaku Islands) and Legal Principles between the Countries Concerned
Yang, Hee Cheol; Kim, Jin Wook;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The dispute between China and Japan regarding is believed to be quite similar to the controversy surrounding Dokdo in terms of historical and post-war processes except for the point that the phenomena of occupation is different with regard to Dokdo. China`s claim to is based on historical title and continuous use while the basis of Japan`s claim is summarized as preoccupancy of ownerless land. Even though Japan acknowledges that China discovered , Japan claims that the act to establish sovereignty over the island from the standpoint of International Law was not taken by China. However, at that time, effective occupation was not an essential prerequisite for the acquisition of a territory. That is to say, from a legal perspective, the legal right for an area could be established based on the discovery of the land, and so it is thought that Japan is applying the current criteria of International Law in a manner that is inappropriate. When we review the post-war process, the San Francisco Peace Treaty does not directly mention . But based on the said treaty, we can note that Japan gave up all rights for the southern area that is north of the boundary line that equates to latitude and that includes the Ryuku Islands and . Of course, the provisions for the territory in the San Francisco Peace Treaty and its disposal are not the final factor for the judgment regarding dominium of . However, it seems clear that Japan`s attitude and interpretation regarding the issues of , the Kuril Islands and Dokdo is problematic.
 Keywords
Diaoyutai(Senkaku);San Francisco Peace Treaty;Dokdo;East China Sea;Maritime Boundary Delimitation;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
배진수 (1997) 세계의 도서분쟁과 독도 시나리오. 한국군사문제연구소, 서울, 55 p (Bae JS (1997) Disputed territories around and a new approach to the Dokdo dispute. Korea Institute for Military Affairs, Seoul, 55 p (in Korean))

2.
양희철 (2012) 조어대(센카쿠)를 둘러싼 중일간 영유권 분쟁과 정책적 제언. In: 해양정책 $I^2$, 한국해양과학기술원, pp 14-15 (Yang HC (2012) China and Japan's Dispute over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. In: Marine Policy I2, KIOST, pp 14-15 (in Korean))

3.
오윤경, 권해룡, 김봉현, 김영원, 김원수, 김은수, 김정환, 김종훈, 마영삼, 문덕호, 박용규, 박철민, 서용현, 오준, 윤상수, 이상규, 이순천, 이충면, 이호진, 임한택, 장동희, 최경보, 최석영, 최승호, 최재철 (2001) 現代 國際法. 박영사, 서울, 844 p (Oh YK, Kwon HR, Kim BH, Kim YW, Kim WS, Kim ES, Kim JH, Kim ZH, Ma YS, Moon DH, Park YK, Park CM, Seo YH, Oh J, Yun SS, Lee SK, Lee SC, Lee CM, Lee HJ, Lim HT, Zhang DH, Choi KB, Choi SY, Choi SH, Choi JC (2001) Modern International Law, ParkYoungSa, Seoul, 844 p (in Korean))

4.
이용희 (2013) 국제판례상 실효적 지배의 개념과 독도에 관한 고찰. Ocean and Polar Res 35(4):313-322 (Lee YH (2013) Reviews on the concept of effective control in international legal cases and with regard to Dokdo. Ocean and Polar Res 35(4):313-322 (in Korean)) crossref(new window)

5.
丘宏達 (1975) 釣魚台問題硏究. In: 丘宏達 (ed) 關於中國領土的國際法問題論文集. 臺灣商務印書館, 台北, 74 p (Qiu HD (1975) Study on the issue of Diao Yu Tai. In: Qiu Hong Da (ed) the journal of International Law Issues regarding the territory of China. Taiwan Commercial Publishing Co., Taipei, 74 p (in Chinese))

6.
丘宏達 (1996) 釣魚台主權爭執問題及其解決方法的硏究. In: 中國國際法學會 (ed) 中國國際法與國際法事務年報. 第10號, 臺灣商務印書館發行, 台北, pp 21-23 (Qiu HD (1996) Study on the issue of Diao Yu Tai sovereignty dispute and its settlement method. In: Society of China International Law (ed) the yearbook of International Law of China and International Law affairs. Vol. 10, Taiwan Commercial Publishing Co., Taipei, pp 21-23 (in Chinese))

7.
梁熙喆 (2006) 從國際海洋法劃界原則和實踐論中國EEZ與大陸架劃界問題. 國立臺灣大學法律學博士論文, 台北, 392 p (Yang HC (2006) Study on the issue of EEZ and delimitation of continental shelf boundary of China through the principle and cases of delimitation of boundary in the International Law of the Sea. Ph.D. Thesis, College of Law of National Taiwan University, Taipei, 392 p (in Chinese))

8.
杜之 (1981) 中外條約關係之變遷. 中央文物供應社, 台北, 95 p (Du HZ (1981) Transition of the relationship of foreign treaty of China. Central Culture Supply Co., Taipei, 95 p (in Chinese))

9.
凌黔遵 (1997) 從國防觀點論釣魚台之主權與戰略價値. 東吳大學軍訓室, 台北, 22 p (Ling QZ (1997) Sovereignty of Diao Yu Tai and its strategic value from national defence perspective. Military Training Office of Dong-O University, Taipei, 22 p (in Chinese))

10.
馬英九 (1986) 從新海洋法論釣魚台與東海劃界問題. 中正書局, 台北, 80 p (Ma YJ (1986) Issue of Diao Yu Tai and the delimitation of boundary for East China Sea in the new law of the sea. ZhongZheng Publishing Co., Taipei, 80 p (in Chinese))

11.
朴春浩 (1998) 東北亞解決領土爭執之某些消極的因素. In: 程家瑞 (ed) 釣魚台之法律地位. 東吳大學法學院, 台北, 71 p (Park CH (1998) Passive factors for the settlement of territorial dispute in the Northeast Asia. In: Cheng Jia Rui (ed) legal position of Diao Yu Tai. Soochow University, Taipei, 71 p (in Chinese))

12.
盛承楠 (1972) 釣魚台採藥記. 學粹 14(2):58 (Sheng CN (1972) Records for the collection of Chinese herbs in Diao Yu Tai. XueCui 14(2):58 (in Chinese))

13.
梁敏錞 (1962) 開羅會議與中國. 亞洲出版社有限公司, 香港, 43 p (Liang MC (1962) Cairo Convention and China. Asia Publishing Co., Hong Kong, 43 p (in Chinese))

14.
楊仲揆 (1998) 歷史上的釣魚台. In: 程家瑞 (ed) 釣魚台之法律地位, 東吳大學法學院, 台北, pp 6-7 (Yang ZG (1998) Diao Yu Tai from historical perspective. In: Cheng JR (ed) legal position of Diao Yu Tai. Soochow University, Taipei, pp 6-7 (in Chinese))

15.
吳靄華 (1985) 琉球歷史上的久米村. 國立臺灣師範大學歷史學報, 第13期, 107 p (Wu AH (1985) Qiu Mi Chun in the history of Liúqiú. The 13th School Bulletin for History. National Taiwan Teacher's College, 107 p (in Chinese))

16.
吳天潁 (1994) 甲午戰前釣魚列嶼歸屬考-兼質日本奧原敏雄諸敎授 初版. 中國社會科學文獻出版社, 北京, pp 93-94 (Wu TL (1994) Study on the belonging of Diao Yu Tai before Gap-O War - Discuss on the 1st edition of Professor Okuhara Toshio of Japan as well. China Social Science Literature Publishing Co., Beijing, pp 93-94 (in Chinese))

17.
王曉波 (1996) 尙未完成的歷史-保釣二十五年 初版. 海峽學術出版社, 台北, 303 p (Wang XP (1996) Uncompleted history - 25 years for the protection of Diao Yu Tai, the 1st edition. Haihyup Academic Publishing Co., Taipei, 303 p (in Chinese))

18.
宇佐美滋(日本每日新聞外信部) (1998) 尖閣列島問題. In: 程家瑞 (ed) 釣魚台之法律地位, 東吳大學法學院, 台北, 337 p (Usami Shigeru (Foreign News Dept. of Japan Mainichi Newspaper) (1998) Issue of SenKaKi islands. In the "legal position of Diao Yu Tai" - main editor Cheng Jia Rui published by Soochow Univ., Taipei, 337 p (in Chinese))

19.
兪寬賜 (1991) 釣魚台主權爭端之經緯與法理. In: 中國國際法與國際事務年報編輯委員會編, 中國國際法學會與國際事務 年報 第5卷. 臺灣商務印書館發行, 台北, pp 33-46 (Yu KC (1991) Details and legal principle of Diao Yu Tai sovereignty dispute. In the yearbook on International Law of China and International Law affairs Vol. 5, arranged by the Society of China International Law, published by Taiwan Commercial Publishing Co., Taipei, pp 33-46 (in Chinese))

20.
劉本炎 (1970) 釣魚台究竟是什麻樣子. 臺灣中央日報, 24 Aug 1970 (Liu BY (1970) How does Diao Yu Tai look like in the world? Taiwan Daily Central Newspaper, 24 Aug 1970 (in Chinese))

21.
劉錫江 (1992) 釣魚台附近海洋環境與資源之調査與硏究. In: 臺灣行政院硏究發展考核委員會, 台北, 160 p (Liu XJ (1992) Survey and study on the marine environment and resources around Diao Yu Tai. In the report of Research and Development Examination Committee of Taiwan Executive Yuan, Taipei, 160 p (in Chinese))

22.
劉蕙孫 (1987) 中國琉球往來史之探討. In: 浦添市敎育委員會 編印 (ed) 浦添市 - 泉州市友好都市締結紀念學術文化討論會報告書, 琉球 - 中國交流史をさぐる, pp 85-99 (Liu HS (1987) Study on the history of travel to and from Liúqiú by China. In: PuTian Education Committee (ed) the report of science and culture seminar commemorating the conclusion of the agreement on the sister cities for PuTian - QuanZhou, Liúqiú-To review of the Chinese history for exchanges. pp 85-99 (in Chinese))

23.
林金莖 著, 孫克蔭譯 (1987) 戰後中日關係與國際法. 中日關係硏究會, 台北, pp 231-232 (Lin JJ (1987) Postwar China-Japan relationship and International Law. China-Japan Relationship Research Association, Taipei, pp 231-232 (in Chinese))

24.
林田富 (1999) 釣魚台主權歸屬之硏究. 五南圖書出版公司, 台北 pp 11-30 ((Lin TF (1999) Study on the belonging of the sovereignty of Diao Yu Tai, published by Wu Nam Publishing Co., Taipei, pp 11-30 (in Chinese))

25.
張士 (1977) 我國對臺澎主權的法理依據. 中央文物供應社, 台北, 23 p (Zhang SC (1977) Legal ground for the sovereignty of Taiwan Peng Hu of our country. Central Culture Publishing Co., Taipei, 23 p (in Chinese))

26.
蔣廷編 (1959) 最近中國外交史資料輯要 中卷. 臺灣商務印 書館, 台北, pp 536-537 (Jiang TF (1959) Summary of China's recent diplomatic data Vol. Middle. Taiwan Commercial Publishing Co., Taipei, pp 536-537 (in Chinese))

27.
傳啓學 (1957) 中國外交史. 台北, 571 p (Chuan QX (1957) China's diplomatic history. Taipei, 571 p (in Chinese))

28.
陳汝勤, 莊文星 (1998) 海洋地質觀點看釣魚台. In: 程家瑞 主編, 釣魚台之法律地位 東吳大學法學院, 台北, 87 p (Chen RQ, Zhuang WX (1998) Diao Yu Tai from the perspective of marine geological features. In: Cheng JR (ed) legal position of Diao Yu Tai. Soochow University, Taipei, 87 p (in Chinese))

29.
戚桐欣 (1970) 釣魚台群島. 中央日報 (Qi DX (1970) Diao Yu Tai islands. Daily Central Newspaper (in Chinese))

30.
井上淸 (1972) 釣魚諸島(尖閣列島)的歷史和領有權(再論). 中國硏究月報 (Inoue K (1972) History of Senkaki and its dominium (Review). China Monthly Research Journal (in Chinese))

31.
井上淸 (1996) 尖閣列島-釣魚諸島の史的解明 初版. 第三書館, 東京, 82 p (Inoue K (1996) 1st edition of historic clarification of Senkaku. The 3rd Publishing Co., Tokyo, 82 p (in Japanese))

32.
奧原敏雄 (1973) 動かめ尖閣列島の日本領有權 - 井上淸論文の 歷史虛構 をあばく. 朝日, 春季, 通卷 13 第1 , 92 p (Okuhara T (1973) Undisputable Japan's dominium for Senkaku - Clarifying the historical fiction of Inoue Kiyoshi's thesis. Asahi Asia Review 13(1):88-92 (in Japanese))

33.
三浦藤作 (1941) 歷代詔勅全集 第六卷. 河出書房, 東京, 269 p (Miura T (1941) Complete edition for historical protocol. Vol. 6. HeChu Publishing Co., Tokyo, 269 p (in Japanese))

34.
伊波普猷.東思納寬惇及橫山重合編 (1941) 琉球史料叢書 第四冊. 名取書店, 東京, 11 p (Iha F, Higashionna K, Yokoyama S (1941) Series of Liuqiu historic data, Vol. 4. Myungchui Publishing Co., Tokyo, 11 p (in Japanese))

35.
日本外務省編 (1950) 日本外交文書 第十八卷. 日本國際連合協會發行, 東京, 575 p (Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1950) Diplomatic documents of Japan, Vol. 18. Japan UN Association, Tokyo, 575 p (in Japanese))

36.
外務省編 (1965) 日本外交表竝主要文書 1840-1945 上冊. 東京, 83 p (Arranged by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1965) Important diplomatic documents of Japan 1840-1945 Book 1. Tokyo, 83 p (in Japanese))

37.
日本外務省 (1972), 尖閣諸島 について. 東京, 19 p (The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1972) About SenKaku Islands. Tokyo, 19 p (in Japanese))

38.
尾崎重義 (1972a) 尖閣諸島の歸屬について. (下の二), レファレンス, 第263號, pp 169-170 (Ozaki S (1972a) About the belonging of Senkaku. (Vol. 2 of the 2nd half), Reference No. 263, pp 169-170 (in Japanese))

39.
尾崎重義 (1972b) 尖閣諸島の歸屬について. (中), レファレンス, 第261號, pp 47-56 (Ozaki S (1972 b) About the belonging of Senkaku (The 2nd half). Reference No. 261, pp 47-56 (in Japanese))

40.
立 作太郞 (1934) 平時國際法論. 日本評論社, 356 p (Tachi S (1934) Theory of peacetime international law. Japan Critique Co., 356 p (in Japanese))

41.
尖閣列島硏究會 (1971) 尖閣列島與日本的領有權. In: 沖繩季刊 第56號, 尖閣列島特集, pp 9-10 (Senkaku Research Association (1971) Senkaku islands and Japan's dominium. Quarterly publication Okinawa No. 56, Special edition, pp 9-10 (in Japanese))

42.
喜舍場一隆 (1972) 尖閣諸島と冊封使錄. 南方同胞援護會, 沖繩季刊 第63號(尖閣列島 特集 第2集), 60 p (Kishaba K (1972) Historic records of Senkaku and its investiture. Southern Compatriot Sponsorship Association, Quarterly publication Okinawa No. 63 (The 2nd Special edition for Senkaku), 60 p (in Japanese))

43.
Bishops WW (1954) Judicial Decisions. AJIL 48:316-326 crossref(new window)

44.
Bosum W (1990) On the current geological knowledge of East China Sea and its petroleum potential. J Oil and Gas Geology 9:100-108

45.
Cheng T (1974) The Sino-Japanese Dispute Over the Tiaoyu-tai(Senkaku) Islands and the Law of Territorial Acquisition. Va J Int Law 14:254

46.
Park CH (1972) Continental shelf issues in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea. Occasional Paper No. 15, Law of the Sea Institute University of Rhode Island, Berkeley, California, US

47.
Park CH (1983) East Asia and the Law of the Sea. Seoul National University Press, Seoul, 33 p

48.
Choy KY (1997) Overview of Taiwan's Legal and Jurisdictional considerations in the Diaoyu/Senkaku Dispute. International Law Conference on the Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands between Taiwan and Japan, Taiwan Yilan City 2-3 Apr. 1997, pp 9

49.
Emery KO, Hayashi Y, Thomas WC, Kobayashi K, Koo JH, Meng CY, Niino H, Osterhagen JH, Reynolds LM, Wageman JM, Wang CS, Yang SJ (1969) Geological structure and some water characteristic of the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea. In: UNECAFE/CCOP Technical Bulletin Vol. 2, pp 4-43

50.
Foreign Relations of the United States (1960) Diplomatic Papers : The Conferences of Berlin (The Potsdam Conference) 1945, Vol. 2, US Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., pp 1471-1476

51.
Foreign Relations of the United States (1961) Diplomatic Papers : The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran 1943. US Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., 324 p

52.
Glahn G (1986) Law Among Nations 5th ed. MacMillan, New York, 316 p

53.
Hornsby M (1972) Japan Asserts Rights to Isles Claimed by China. London Times, 19 Mar 1972

54.
ICJ (1953) The Minquiers and Ecrehos case (UK/France). In: ICJ Reports, pp 56

55.
Inoue K (1972) The Tiaoyu Islands (Senkaku Island) are China's Territory. Peking Review 15(19):18-22

56.
Jennings RY (1961) The Aquisition of Territory in International Law. Manchester University Press, Manchester, 130 p

57.
Supreme Court of the United States (1823) Johnson and Graham's Lessee v. M'Intosh Case 21 US 8 Wheaton 543

58.
Linebarger P (1954) Far Eastern Governments and Politics. D Van Nostrand Co., New York, 630 p

59.
Matsui Y (1997) Legal Bases and Anaysis of Japan's Claims to Diaoyu Islands. International Law Conference on the Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands between Taiwan and Japan, Taiwan Yilan City, 2-3 Apr 1997, pp 12-13

60.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (1972) The Basic View on the Sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands. http://www.mofa.go.jp/ja/senkaku.html Accesed 15 Aug 2014

61.
Okuhara T (1973) The Problem of Senkaku Islands and the Article by Inoue. Kiyoshi Asahi Asia Review 13

62.
Okuhara T (1975) The Process of Incorporation of the Senkaku Islands. Seikeigakkaishi, Kokushikan University 4

63.
Ozaki S (1995) International Legal Status of the Senkaku Islands : Mainly on its Historical Aspects. Tsukuba Hosei 18

64.
Prescott C, Schofield C (2005) The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp 217-218

65.
Jennings RY (1963) The Acquisition of Territory in International Law. Manchester University Press, Manchester, 130 p

66.
PCIJ (1928) Island of Palmas Case. In: Reports of international arbitral awards, Vol. 2, pp 831-871

67.
PCIJ (1933) The Legal Status of Eastern Greenland Case

68.
Rebert M, Martin D (2003) Cases and Materials on International Law, 4th ed. Oxford University Press, New York

69.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China (1972) Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. Peking Review 15(1):12

70.
Clipperton Islands Case (1932) France. v. Mexico, 1931. Am J Int Law 26:394

71.
U.S. Government Printing Office (1972) United States Treaties and Other International Agreements 23(I), Washington D.C., pp 449-458

72.
United States Department of State Historical Office (1957) American Foreign Policy 1950-1955. Basic Documents 1, Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., 453 p

73.
Valencia MJ (2007) The East China Sea Dispute: Context, Claims, Issues, and Possible Solutions. Asian Perspec 31(1):150-156

74.
Van Dyke JM (2009) Maritime Boundary Disputes, Settlement Processes, and the Law of the Sea. In: Hong SY and Van Dyke JM (eds) Disputes Over Islands and Maritime Boundaries in East Asia. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp 39-76

75.
Wageman JM, Hidde TWC, Emery KO (1970) Structural framework of East China Sea and Yellow Sea. AAPG Bull 54(9):1611-1643

76.
Zhou C (1989) Oil-gas exploration in the East China Sea and the main achievements. Mar Geol Quaternary Geo 9:51-61

77.
Permanent Representative of Japan (2007) Declarations Recognizing the Jurisdiction of the Court as Compulsory. http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/?p1=5&p2=1&p3=3&code=JP Accesed 15 May 2014

78.
UN DOALOS (2013) Declarations and statements. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_declarations.htm Accesed 8 May 2014