JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Tests for Asymmetry and Structure Changes in Retail Price Volatility of Fresh Common Squid in the Republic of Korea
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Ocean and Polar Research
  • Volume 37, Issue 4,  2015, pp.357-368
  • Publisher : Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology
  • DOI : 10.4217/OPR.2015.37.4.357
 Title & Authors
Tests for Asymmetry and Structure Changes in Retail Price Volatility of Fresh Common Squid in the Republic of Korea
Nam, Jongoh; Sim, Seonghyun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study analyzed structural changes and asymmetry of price volatility during the period before and after a point of structural change in price volatility, using the Korean fresh common squid daily retail price data from January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2015. This study utilized the following analytical methods: the unit-root test was applied to ensure the stability of the data, the Quandt-Andrews breakpoint test was applied to find the point of structural change, and the Glosten-Jagannathan-Runkle GARCH and EGARCH models were applied to investigate the asymmetry of price volatility. The empirical results of this study are as follows. First, ADF, PP, KPSS and Zivot-Andrews tests showed that the daily retail price change rate of the Korean fresh common squid differentiated by logarithm was stable. Secondly, the ARIMA (2,1,2) model was selected by information criteria such as AIC, SC, and HQ. Thirdly, the Quandt-Andrews breakpoint test found that a single structural change in price volatility occurred on June 11, 2009. Fourthly, the Glosten-Jagannathan-Runkle GARCH and EGARCH models showed that estimates of coefficients within the models were statistically significant before and after structural change and also that asymmetry as a leverage effect existed before and after structural change.
 Keywords
structural change;volatility;asymmetry;Quandt-Andrews breakpoint test;GJR GARCH model;EGARCH model;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
강석규 (2014) 양식 넙치가격변동성의 구조변화와 비대칭성 검증. 수산경영논집 45(2):29-59 Kang SK (2014) Tests for the structure change and asymmetry of price volatility in farming olive flounder. Korean Soc Fish Bus Admin 45(2):29-38 (in Korean)

2.
고봉현 (2007) GARCH 모형을 이용한 수산물의 가격변동성에 관한 연구. 해양정책연구 22(2):29-54 Ko BH (2007) A Study on the price volatility of fisheries using GARCH model. Ocean Pol Res 22(2):29-54 (in Korean)

3.
고봉현 (2009) 수산물 시장에서의 양식어류 가격변동성.계절성.요일효과에 관한 연구. 수산경영론집 40(2):49-70 Ko BH (2009) Price volatility, seasonality and dayof-theweek effect for aquacultural fishes in Korean fishery markets. J Fish Bus Admin 40(2):49-70 (in Korean)

4.
고봉현 (2014) 수산물 거래량의 변동성이 가격변동성에 미치는 영향분석. 한국산학기술학회논문지 15(10):6084-6091 Ko BH (2014) Influences of volume volatilities on price volatilities in the fishery market. J Korea Acad-Ind Soc 15(10):6084-6091 (in Korean)

5.
통계청 (2015) 소비자 물가지수. http://kosis.kr/ Accessed 15 Oct 2015 Statistics Korea (2015) Consumer price index. http://kosis.kr/ Accessed 15 Oct 2015

6.
한국농수산식품유통공사 (2015) 농수산물 유통정보. http://www.kamis.co.kr/ Accessed 15 Oct 2015 Korea Agro-Fisheries and Food Trade Corporation (2015) Korea Agricultural Marketing Information Service. http://www.kamis.co.kr/ Accessed 15 Oct 2015

7.
Andrews DW (1993) Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61(4):821-856 crossref(new window)

8.
Andrews DW, Ploberger W (1994) Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica 62(6):1383-1414 crossref(new window)

9.
Bai J, Perron P (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66(1):47-78 crossref(new window)

10.
Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econometrics 31(3):307-327 crossref(new window)

11.
Box GE, Jenkins GM (1976) Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco, 575 p

12.
Chow GC (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28(3):591-605 crossref(new window)

13.
Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427-431

14.
Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50(4):987-1007 crossref(new window)

15.
Glosten LR, Jagannathan R, Runkle DE (1993) On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. J Fina 48(5):1779-1801 crossref(new window)

16.
Hansen BE (1997) Approximate asymptotic p values for structuras-change tests. J Bus Econ Stat 15(1):60-67

17.
Jarque CM, Bera AK (1980) Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Econ Lett 6(3):255-259 crossref(new window)

18.
Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J Econometrics 54:159-178 crossref(new window)

19.
Ljung GM, Box GE (1978) On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 65(2):297-303 crossref(new window)

20.
Nelson CR, Plosser CR (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconmic time series: some evidence and implications. J Mone Eco 10(2):139-162 crossref(new window)

21.
Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica 59(2):347-370 crossref(new window)

22.
Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57(6):1361-1401 crossref(new window)

23.
Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335-346 crossref(new window)

24.
Quandt RE (1960) Tests of the hypothesis that a linear regression system obeys two separate regimes. J Am Stat Assoc 55(290):324-330 crossref(new window)

25.
Schwert W (2013) EViews user's guide 2. IHS Global Inc, 990 p

26.
White HA (1980) Heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4):817-838 crossref(new window)

27.
Zivot E, Andrews DW (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root. J Bus Eco Stat 10(3):251-270