Evaluation of Corrosion Characteristics of Underwater Hardening Paint Moon, Kyung-Man; Oh, Min-Seok; Lee, Myung-Hoon; Lee, Syung-Yul; Kim, Yun-Hae;
Many protection methods such as surface coating, electric protection, or other methods have been applied to the numerous steel structures widely used in continental and marine areas to control their corrosion, which is done from an economic point of view. Most of these steel structures are primarily protected by coating methods. However, some steel piles under seawater are protected by the electric protection method, that is, either using an impressed current or a sacrificial anode method. Furthermore, environmental contamination may cause a severely corrosive environment, which, in turn, causes the accelerated corrosion of steel structures. Subsequently, coated steel structures could deteriorate more rapidly than the designed lifetime because of the acid rain caused by air pollution, etc. Therefore, a coating of marine paint exposed to seawater, that is, underwater hardening painting, is increasingly required to be fast drying as well as highly corrosion resistant. In this study, five types of underwater hardening paints were prepared with different resin series and additives. Their corrosion and water resistances were investigated using electrochemical methods such as corrosion potential, polarization curves, impedance and cyclic voltammogram measurements, etc. Even though it is generally accepted that the corrosion resistance of bare steel tends to increase with a shift of the corrosion potential in the noble direction, the corrosion resistance of a sample with a coating exhibited a relatively better tendency when it had a lower corrosion potential in this study. The corrosion current density was also decreased with a decrease in the diffusion limiting current density, which may mean that there is some relationship between corrosion and water resistance. The S sample of the ceramic resin series showed the relatively best corrosion and water resistance among those of samples, while the worst corrosion and water resistance were observed for the R sample of the epoxy resin series. The corrosion and water resistance of those samples tended to deteriorate with an increase in the immersion days, and their corrosion and water resistances were considered to be apparently improved by the types of resin and additives.
Corrosion resistance;Underwater hardening paints;Electrochemical methods;Resin series;Diffusion limiting current density;
Compton, K.G. (1961). "Factor Involved in Corrosion of Lead Cable Sheath", CORROSION, Vol 17, pp 115-118.
Gartland, P.O., Bardel, E., Andresen, R.E. and Johnson, R. (1984). "Effect of Flow on the Cathodic Protection of a Steel Cylinder in Sea Water", CORROSION, Vol 40, No 3, pp 127-133.
Hiramatsi, M., Hino, M. and Omi, T. (1996). "Current Trend in Development of Corrosion Protective Plating", Zairo-to-Kankyo, Vol 45, No 1, pp 33-41.
Cicognami, P. (1990). "Application of the Boundary-Element Method to Offshore Cathodic Protection Modeling", J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol 137, No 6, pp 1689-1695.
Jones, D.A. and Nair, N.R. (1985). "Electrochemical Corrosion Studies on Zinc-Coated Steel", CORROSION, Vol 41, No 6, pp 357-362.
Newman, J. (1991). "Cathodic Protection with Parrel Cylinders", J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol 130, No 12, pp 3554-3559.
Steinsmo, U. and Bardal, E. (1989a). "Factors Limiting the Cathodic Current on Painted Steel", J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol 136, No 12, pp 3588-3594.
Steinsmo, U., Ska, J.I., and Bardal, E. (1989b). "The Effect of the Dry Film Thickness, Temperature, and Electrolyte on the Cathodic Current of Painted Steel", J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol 136, No 12, pp 3383-3587.
Talati, J.D., Patel, G.A. and Gandhi, D.K. (1984). "Maximum Utilization Current Density", CORROSION, Vol 40, No 2, pp 88-91.
The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan, (1998). "Corrosion Protection and Repair Manual for Port and Harbor Steel Structures", pp 27-96.