JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Computational Analysis of Structural Behavior of Subsea Pipelines with Local Corrosion
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Computational Analysis of Structural Behavior of Subsea Pipelines with Local Corrosion
Choi, Kwang-Ho; Lee, Chi-Seung; Ryu, Dong-Man; Koo, Bon-Yong; Song, Joon-Kyu; Lee, Jae-Myung;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
To meet the increasing demand for energy around the world, offshore and subsea energy development is constantly being conducted. This trend is accompanied by an increasing demand for pipeline installation, which brings numerous problems, including those related to accessibility, high pressure, and corrosion. Among these, corrosion is a primary factor in pipeline fractures, and can cause severe environmental and industrial damage. Hence, accurate corrosion assessment for corroded pipelines is very important. For this reason, the present study investigated the mechanical behavior of an idealized corroded subsea pipeline with an internal/external pressure load using the commercial FEA code ABAQUS. Then, the analysis result was compared with corrosion assessment codes such as ASME B31G, DNV RP F101, ABS. Finally, a fitness-for-service assessment was conducted.
 Keywords
Corrosion;Subsea pipeline;Fitniess-for-service assessment;Finite element Analysis;Burst pressure;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), 2008. Guide for Building and Classing Subsea Pipeline Systems. [Online] (Updated February 2014) Available at: [Accessed August 2013].

2.
American Petroleum Institute (API), 2007. Fitness-For-Service 579-1. [Online] (Updated June 2007) Available at: [Accessed August 2013].

3.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2012. Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines B31G. [Online] (Updated October 2012) Available at: [Accessed Augutst 2013].

4.
Bedairi, B., Cronin, D., Hosseini, A., Plumtree, A., 2012. Failure Prediction for Crack-in-Corrosion Defects in Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 96-97, 90-99. crossref(new window)

5.
Caputo, A.C., Pelagagge, P.M., Ponticiello, I., 2004. Mixed Gas - Oil Subsea Pipelines in Offshore Technology : Technical and Economic Aspects. Thermal Engineering, 5, 24-32.

6.
Cosham, A., Hopkins, P., 2004. The Assessment of Corrosion in Pipelines - Guidance in the Pipeline Defect Assessment Manual (PDAM). Pipeline Pigging and Integrity Management Conference, Amsterdam Netherlands, 1-31.

7.
Cronin, D.S., 2000. Assessment of Corrosion Defects in Pipelines, Doctoral Degree Dissertation, University of Waterloo.

8.
Det Norske Veritas (DNV), 2010. Corroded Pipelines Recommended Practice F101, (Updated October 2010) Available at: [Accessed August 2013].

9.
Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2013. Annual Energy Outlook 2013 with Projections to 2040. (Updated April 2013) Available at: [Accessed March 2014].

10.
Fekete, G., Varga, L., 2012. The Effect of the Width to Length Ratios of Corrosion Defects on the Burst Pressures of Transmission Pipelines, Engineering Failure Analysis, 21, 21-30. crossref(new window)

11.
Lee, O.S., Kim, H.J., 2000. Effect of External Corrosion in Pipeline on Failure Prediction, International Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering, 1, 48-54.

12.
Ma, B., Shuai, J., Liu, D., Xu, K., 2013. Assessment on Failure Pressure of High Strength Pipeline with Corrosion Defects, Engineering Failure Analysis, 32, 209-219. crossref(new window)

13.
Mohd, M.H., Paik, J.K., 2012. Investigation of the Corrosion Progress Characteristics of Offshore Subsea Oil Well Tubes. Corrosion Science, 67, 130-141.

14.
Netto, T.A., Ferraz, U.S., Estefen, S.F., 2005. The Effect of Corrosion Defects on the Burst Pressure Pipelines. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61, 1185-1204. crossref(new window)

15.
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), 2013. Filtered Incident Files. (Updated April 2014) Available at: [Accessed March 2014].

16.
Thomas, M., 2012. Forecast: Capex Surge in the Pipeline. (Updated June 2012) Available at: [Accessed March 2014].

17.
Valor, A., Caleyo, F., Hallen, J.M., Velazquez, J.C., 2012. Reliability Assessment of Buried Pipelines Based on Different Corrosion Rate Models. Corrosion Science, 66, 78-87.

18.
Wang, H., Sun, J., Jukes, P., 2009. Draft: FEA of a Laminate Internal Buckle Arrestor for Deep Water Pipe-in-pipe Flowlines. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Honolulu USA, 447-452.

19.
Xu, L.Y., Cheng, Y.F., 2012. Reliability and Failure Pressure Prediction of Various Grades of Pipeline Steel in the Presence of Corrosion Defects and Pre-strain. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 89, 75-84. crossref(new window)