JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Development of Three-Dimensional Fracture Strain Surface in Average Stress Triaxiaility and Average Normalized Lode Parameter Domain for Arctic High Tensile Steel: Part II Formulation of Fracture Strain Surface
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Development of Three-Dimensional Fracture Strain Surface in Average Stress Triaxiaility and Average Normalized Lode Parameter Domain for Arctic High Tensile Steel: Part II Formulation of Fracture Strain Surface
Chong, Joonmo; Park, Sung-Ju; Kim, Younghun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
An extended study was conducted on the fracture criterion by Choung et al. (2011; 2012) and Choung and Nam (2013), and the results are presented in two parts. The theoretical background of the fracture and the results of new experimental studies were reported in Part I, and three-dimensional fracture surface formulations and verifications are reported in Part II. How the corrected true stress can be processed from the extrapolated true stress is first introduced. Numerical simulations using the corrected true stress were conducted for pure shear, shear-tension, and pure compression tests. The numerical results perfectly coincided with test results, except for the pure shear simulations, where volume locking appeared to prevent a load reduction. The average stress triaxialities, average normalized lode parameters, and equivalent plastic strain at fracture initiation were extracted from numerical simulations to formulate a new three-dimensional fracture strain surface. A series of extra tests with asymmetric notch specimens was performed to check the validity of the newly developed fracture strain surface. Then, a new user-subroutine was developed to calculate and transfer the two fracture parameters to commercial finite element code. Simulation results based on the user-subroutine were in good agreement with the test results.
 Keywords
Average stress triaxiality;Averge normalized lode parameter;Fracture strain surface;Uniuform true stress;Corrected true stress;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Altair, 2013. HyperWorks 12.0 User Manual. Altair.

2.
Bai, Y., Wierzbicki, T., 2008. A New Model of Metal Plasticity and Fracture with Pressure and Lode Dependence. International Journal of Plasticity, 24(6), 1071-1096. crossref(new window)

3.
Choung, J., 2009. Comparative Studies of Fracture Models for Marine Structural Steels. Ocean Engineering, 36(15), 1164-1174. crossref(new window)

4.
Choung, J., Shim, C.S., Kim, K.S., 2011. Plasticity and Fracture Behaviors of Marine Structural Steel: Part III - Experimental Study on Failure Strain. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 25(3), 53-66. crossref(new window)

5.
Choung, J. Shim C.S., Song H.C., 2012. Estimation of Failure Strain of EH36 High Strength Marine Structural Steel Using Average Stress Triaxiality. Marine Structures, 29(1), 1-21. crossref(new window)

6.
Choung, J., Nam, W., 2013. Formulation of Failure Strain According to Average Stress Triaxiality of Low Temperature High Strength Steel (EH36). Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 27(2), 19-26. crossref(new window)

7.
Choung, J., Nam, W., Kim, Y., 2014a. Fracture Simulation of Low-temperature High-strength Steel (EH36) Using User-subroutine of Commercial Finite Element Code. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 28(1), 34-46. crossref(new window)

8.
Choung, J., Nam, W., Lee, D., Song, S.Y., 2014b. Failure Strain Formulation Via Average Stress Triaxiality of an High Strength Steel for Arctic Structures. Ocean Engineering, 91, 218-226. crossref(new window)

9.
Simulia, 2008. Abaqus User Manual. Silumia.