JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Risk Analysis of Container Ship Accidents and Risk Mitigation Measures
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Risk Analysis of Container Ship Accidents and Risk Mitigation Measures
Kim, Dong-Jin; Kwak, Su-Yong;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The study performs a risk analysis on container ship accidents using accident data collected over the six years from 2006 to 2011, presents the resulting risk level, and suggests three risk mitigation measures to reduce the overall risk, for the safer operation of container ships. More specifically, starting from the initial accident of collision, we developed 13 different accident scenarios using event tree analysis based on which the overall risk level was obtained and presented as a FN curve. Since diverse human factors are the main cause of most of the ship accidents, our study focuses on the effect of reducing human causes on the resulting risk level. For the research we considered the injuries for the calculation of fatality with the help of MAIS. The results show that collision was the main type of accident, accounting for 62 % of all accidents, and the measures employed were proven to be effective in the sense that the risk level was much lowered and the average number of fatalities was also reduced. With more data accumulated, more precise risk level will be calculated with which the practical risk mitigating measures will be also developed. For future study, economic loss and environmental damage as consequences need to be considered.
 Keywords
Risk analysis;Ship accidents;Risk mitigation measures;Event tree analysis;FN curve;MAIS;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
A Probabilistic Approach to Forecasting and Evaluating the Risk of Fishing Vessel Accidents in Korea,;

해양환경안전학회지, 2018. vol.24. 3, pp.302-310 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Ball, D. and F. Peter(2002), Societal Risks, Final Report, Health and Safety Executive.

2.
Caridis, P.(1999), CASMET, Casualty Analysis Methodology for Maritime Operations, National Technical University of Athens.

3.
Cho, S. J., D. J. Kim and K. S. Choi(2013), Hazardous and Noxious Substances(HNS) Risk Assessment and Accident Prevention Measures on Domestic Marine Transportation, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 145-154. crossref(new window)

4.
Darbra, R. M. and J. Casal(2004), Historical Analysis of Accidents in Seaports. Safety Science, Vol. 42(2), pp. 85-98. crossref(new window)

5.
Ferdous, R., F. Khan, R. Sadio, P. Amyotte and B. Veitch (2009), Handling Data Uncertainty in Event Tree Analysis, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 87, pp. 283-292. crossref(new window)

6.
Geijerstam, K. af and H. Svensson(2008), Ship Collision Risk, Report 5275, Lund University.

7.
International Maritime Organization(2002), Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment(FSA) for Use in IMO Rule Making 27-Process, MSC/Circ.1023,MEPC/Circ.392.5April2002. IMO, London, UK.

8.
Kim, D. J. and S. Y. Kim(2008), A Methodology for Risk Analysis on Ship Accidents at Port Area, The Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 59, pp. 105-121.

9.
Kim, D. J. and S. Y. Kwak(2011), Identification and analysis of human errors in maritime ship accidents, Journal of Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 87-98. crossref(new window)

10.
Kontovas, C. A.(2005), Formal Safety Assessment (Critical Review and Future Role), Diploma thesis, National Technical University of Athens.

11.
Portela, R. C.(2005), MARITIME CASUALTIES ANALYSIS AS A TOOL TO IMPROVE RESEARCH about human factors on maritime environment, Journal of Maritime Research, Vol. II, No. 2, pp. 3-18.

12.
Rao, P. G. and K. V. Raghavan(1996), Hazard and Risk Potential of Chemical Handling at Ports, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 199-204. crossref(new window)

13.
Ronza, A., S. Felez, R. M. Darbra, S. Carol, J. A. Vilchez and J. Casal(2003), Predicting the Frequency of Accidents in Port Areas by Developing Event Trees from Historical Analysis, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 16, pp. 551-560. crossref(new window)

14.
Ronza, A., S. Carol, V. Espejo, J. A. Vilchez and J. Arnaldos (2006), A Quantitative Risk Analysis Approach to Port Hydrocarbon Logistics, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. A128, pp. 10-24.

15.
Schleier III, J. J. and R. K. D. Peterson(2010), Limitations of the Entomological Operational Risk Assessment Using Probabilistic and Deterministic Analyses, Military Medicine, Vol. 175, pp. 594-598(5). crossref(new window)

16.
Trbojevic, V. M. and B. J. Carr(2000), Risk Based Methodology for Safety Improvements in Ports, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 71, pp. 467-480. crossref(new window)

17.
U.S. department of transportation(1999), Maritime trade and transportation.

18.
U.S. office of the secretary of transportation(2008), Departmental Guidance Memorandum, Report, pp. 1-8.

19.
Yip, T. L.(2008), Port Traffic Risks - A Case Study of Accidents in Hong Kong Waters, Transportation Research, PartE 44, pp. 921-931. crossref(new window)