JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Parametric Study about Blade Shapes and Blade Numbers of Water Wheel Type Tidal Turbine by Numerical Method
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Parametric Study about Blade Shapes and Blade Numbers of Water Wheel Type Tidal Turbine by Numerical Method
Nguyen, Manh Hung; Jeong, Haechang; Jhang, Sung-su; Kim, Bu-gi; Yang, Changjo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In this paper, a numerical experiment on a tidal turbine was performed based on a water wheel design using the commercial CFD code ANSYS-CFX to contribute to the development of water wheels. The water wheel type tidal turbine was studied with different numbers of rotor blades (including ten, twelve and twenty blades types) and with different blade shapes (Straight, Curved and Zuppinger types) for comparison at several values of tip speed ratio (TSR) ranging from 0.7 to 1.2. The numerical results indicated that the 10-bladed type and the Straight-bladed type turbines absorb the highest power efficiency, up to 43 % at TSR 0.9. In addition, the 20-bladed and the Curved-bladed types showed the lowest performances in all cases of TSRs comparing with the others. Besides that, it was found that this turbine operates much effectively at low range of TSR, especially at TSRs 0.9 and 1 for all cases of blade shapes and all numbers of blades.
 Keywords
Water wheels;CFD;Power coefficient;Tidal current energy;Torque coefficient;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Behrouzi, F., A. Maimun and M. Nakisa(2014), Review of Various Designs and Development in Hydropower Turbines, International Journal of Mechanical, Industrial Science and Engineering, 2015, Volume 8, Number 2, pp. 87-91.

2.
Capecchi, D.(2013), Over and Undershot Waterwheels in the 18th Century. Science-Technology Controversy, Journal of Advances in Historical Studies, 2013, Volume 2, Number 3, pp. 131-139. crossref(new window)

3.
Charlier, R. H.(2003), A "Sleeper" Awakes: Tidal Current Power, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2003, Volume 7, Number 6, pp. 515-529. crossref(new window)

4.
Denny, M.(2004), The Efficiency of Overshot and Undershot Waterwheels, European Journal of Physics, 2004, Volume 25, Number 2, pp. 193-202. crossref(new window)

5.
Muller, G., S. Denchfield and R. Schelmerdine(2007), Stream Wheels for Applications in Shallow and Deep Water, IAHR Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2007, Volume 42, Number 5, pp. 6-15.

6.
Muller, G.(2007), Water Wheels as a Power Source, Journal of Renewable Energy, 2007, Volume 8, Number 18, pp. 95-103.

7.
Sam, A. A.(2010), Water Wheel CFD Simulation, Master Dissertation, Division of Fluid Mechanics, Lund University, UK, 2010, pp. 24-39.

8.
Turnock, S. R., G. Muller, R. F. Nicholls-Lee, S. Dechfield, S. Hindley, S. Schelmerdine and S. Stevens(2007), Development of a Floating Tidal Energy System Suitable for Use in Shallow Water, Proceedings of the 7th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, 2007, pp. 189-198.

9.
Yasuyuki, N., T. Inagaki, Y. Li, R. Omiya and K. Hatano(2014), Research on the Flow Field of Undershot Cross-flow Water Turbines Using Experiments and Numerical Analysis, 27th Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, 2014, Volume 6, Number 16, pp. 22-31.

10.
Yasuyuki, N., T. Inagaki, Y. Li and K. Hatano(2015), Study on an Undershot Cross-flow Water Turbine with Straight Blades, International Journal of Rotating Machine, 2015, Volume 20, Number 5, pp. 161-171.

11.
Yelguntwar, P., P. Bhange, Y. Lilhare and A. Bahadure (2014), Design, Fabrication and Testing of a Waterwheel for Power Generation in an Open Channel Flow, International Research in Engineering and Advanced Technology, 2014, Volume 2, Number 1, pp. 1-6.