JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Analysis of LPG Facility Siting Considering BLEVE
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Analysis of LPG Facility Siting Considering BLEVE
Kim, Taebeom; Lee, Kyounglim; Lee, Juhee; Jung, Seungho; Lee, Kunmo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In previous studies on LPG siting in Korea, the scope have not included the probability of the secondary events of adjacent LPG tanks or structures from an explosion source. Therefore, it is essential to first identify the phenomenon which can be caused by BLEVE and then, properly assess their effects to each target including secondary event. In this study, we calculated the effects from a potential BLEVE of 15 ton LPG tank causing damages of storage tanks (LPG), structures and human using Phast ver. 6.7 and then suggested three risk zones (Zone I, II, III) assuming the consequences such as overpressure, heat radiation and missile effect by fragments. Zone I and II are divided at the line of 50% occurrence of the secondary event. Zone II and III are divided by Individual Risk(IR). The zone approach in this study can be used for more effective and safer Land Use Planning (LUP) for the future.
 Keywords
BLEVE;LPG siting;QRA;consequence analysis;risk-based zoning;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
S. H. Leem, "A Study on the Quantitative Analysis for Explosion of LPG Storage Tank", Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 1-7, 2013.

2.
S. C. Cha, "A Study on Design Improvement using Quantitative Risk Assessment in Propane Storage Facilities", Doctor thesis, pp. 1-116, 2006.

3.
S. L. Lee, "A Study on the Probability of BLEVE of Above-ground LPG Gas Storage Tanks Exposed to External Fire", Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 19-23, 2003.

4.
F. P. Lees, "Loss prevention in the Process Industries: Hazard Identification Assessment and Control", Butterworths, Vol. 1, Third edition, pp. 10/15, 1980.

5.
Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), "Guidelines for Vapor Cloud Explosion, Pressure Vessel Burst, BLEVE and Flash Fire Hazards", Second edition, pp. 232-310, 2010.

6.
P. A. M. Uijt de Haag, B. J. M. Ale, "Guidelines for quantitative Risk Assessment (Purple book)", Ministry of Netherlands, pp. 4.45, 2005.

7.
V. Cozzani, "The Quantitative Assessment of Domino Effects Caused by Overpressure Part I. Probit Models", Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 107, No. 3, pp. 76, 2004.

8.
V. Cozzani, "Escalation Thresholds in the Assessment of Domino Accidental Events", Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 129, No. 1-3, pp. 5-6, 2005.

9.
V. Cozzani, "A Simplified Model for the Assessment of the Impact Probability of Fragments", Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 116, No. 3, pp. 184, 2004.

10.
P. L. Holden and A. B. Reeves, "Fragment Hazards from Failures of Pressured Liquefied Gas Vessels", IChemE Symposium Series, Vol. 93, pp. 208-209, 1985.

11.
P. H. Bottelberghs, "Risk Analysis and Safety Policy Developments in the Netherlands", Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 71, No. 1-3, pp. 68-73, 2000.

12.
J. H. Lee, "Accidental Frequency Variations on the Capabilities of Safety Devices Installed in the LPG Refuelling Stations", Theories and Applications of Chem. Eng, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1150-1151, 2006.

13.
J. LaChance, "Analyses to Support Development of Risk-Informed Separation Distances for Hydrogen Codes and Standards", pp. 48, 2009.

14.
J. K. Yoon, "Discussions on the Cause of Bucheon LPG Station Accident", Journal of the Korea Institute for Industrial Safety, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 32, 2001.

15.
S. H. Leem, "A Study on the Optimal Installation Technology of LPG Storage Tank through Taguchi Method", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 99, 2010.

16.
S. K. Roh, "A Study on Damage Effect from Major Accident of LPG Charging Facility - A case study of an LPG Charging and Automotive Outlet ", Korean Security Science Review, No. 2, pp. 93, 1999.