Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Implication Measures between Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development Indicators
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Implication Measures between Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development Indicators
Hong, Sang-Pyo;
  PDF(new window)
In 2015, Summits of State and Government at United Nations General Assembly agreed to set the world on a path towards Sustainable Development(SD) through the adoption of the 2030 Agenda. 2030 Agenda adopts 17 Sustainable Development Gooals(SDG) to achieve 3 pillars of social security, economic efficiency and environmental integrity. Sustainable Development Indicators(SDI) which are suggested by UN SDSN(United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network), have been developed for measuring SDG implementation, by which Sustainability Assessment(SA) can be accomplished to check through more holistic approaches to poverty alleviation, social inclusion and environmental management. In Korea, Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment(SEIA) has been applied to PPP(policy, plan, program) by `Ministry of Environment`, whereas `National Land Planning Assessment(NLPA) which is one sort of SEA has been implemented to evaluate PPP of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport`. Although SEIA and NLPA have been utilized as decision-making support tools for stakeholders including high authorities, the reference criteria of these institutions are not considered as convincible and communicable. Evaluation criteria of alternatives which are core principles for SEIA and NLPA seem so ambiguous and unscientific. Through incorporation of SDI into SEIA, a convenient, quick and credible diagnosis of the key dimensions of SD comprising social equity, economic development and environmental management, can help develop a shared understanding of priorities of implementation of SDG.
Sustainability Assessment;Strategic Environmental Assessment;National Land Planning Assessment;
 Cited by
Barry N, Evelin U. 2007. Categorizing Tools for Sustainability Assessment. Ecological Economics 60: 498-508. crossref(new window)

Bond A, Saunders A. 2011. Re-evaluating Sustainability Assessment: Aligning the Vision and the Practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 31(1): 1-7. crossref(new window)

Carraro C, Campagnolo L, Eboli F, Farnia L. 2015. Assessing Sustainable Development Goals. SDSN Conference on 'Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals: Getting Started'.

Cho GJ. 2010. Research on SEA Methodology for Urban Master Plans. Korea Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]

Devuyst D. 2000. Linking Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development at the Local Level: Introduction of Sustainability Assessment Systems, Sustainable Development 8: 67-78. crossref(new window)

Donnelly A, Jones MB, O'Mahony T, Byrne G. 2007. Selecting Environmental Indicators for Use in Strategic Environmental Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 27(2): 161-175. crossref(new window)

Farnia L, Giove S. 2015. Fuzzy Measures and Experts' Opinion Elicitation, Smart Innovation. Systems and Technologies 37: 229-241.

Gao JJ, Kornov L, Christensen P. 2013. Do Indicators Influence Communication in SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 43: 121-128. crossref(new window)

Gudmundsson H, Joumard R, Aschemann R. 2010. Indicators and Their Functions, In: Joumard R, Gudmundsson H. Editors. Indicators of Environmental Sustainability in Transport. Les Collections; pp.23-45.

Hong SP. 2011. A Study on the Implication of Sustainability and Environmental Assessment. J Environ Impact Assess. 20(3): 269-279. [Korean Literature]

Jeong HS, Yun KS. 2003. A Study on Ecological- Economic Model Development for Sustainability Evaluation II. Korea Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]

Kim HS, Song YI, Kim YJ, Lim YS. 2007. Linking Environmental Assessment and Sustainable Development Indicators. Korea Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]

Ko JK, Joo JH. 2015. Developing and Monitoring Indicators of Sustainable Development in Gyeoggi-do. Gyeoggi Research Institute. [Korean Literature]

Korean Ministry of Environment. 2015. Regulations on Preparations of Environmental Impact Statements etc. Notification of Ministry of Environment 2015-141. [Korean Literature]

Kwon YH, Oh JK, Ahn SE. 2014. Indicator Development for Policy-level Plan Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment. Korea Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]

Lee JS. 2015. A Study on the Analysis of the Opinion Gap Related to the Constituent Element of Sustainable Development and a Strengthening Plan of the Environmental Element. Ph. D. Dissertation. Chonnam National University, Daejeon. [Korean Literature]

Oh JK, Kwon YH. 2015. A Comparative Study on the Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea and Foreign Countries. J Environ Impact Assess. 24(3): 244-259. [Korean Literature] crossref(new window)

Oh SG, Kim EK. 2014. A Study on the Sustainability Assessment for Improving Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case of Chungcheongnam-Do. J Local Govern Studies. 17(4): 363-385. [Korean Literature]

Partidario M. 2007. Scales and Associated Data- What is Enough for SEA Needs?. J Environ Impact Assess Review. 27(5): 460-478. crossref(new window)

Sadler B. 1999. Framework for Environmental Sustainability Assessment and Assurance. In: Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment. Blackwell Science; p.12-32.

Schwarz J, Beloff B, Beaver E. 2002. Use Sustainability Metrices to Guide Decisionmaking. Available from:

Searcy C. 2009. The Role of Sustainable Development Indicators in Corporate Decision-making. International Institute for Sustainable Development; p.2.

UNCED. 1992. The Rio Declaration Environment and Development.

UN SDSN. 2015. Why a Guide for Getting Started?. p.14.

Yoo HS. 2013. A Study on the Effective Management of the Strategic Environmental Assessment - Establishment Procedure and Characteristics of Policy Plan -. Korea Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]