JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparison of Commuters' PM10 Exposure Using Different Transportation Modes of Bus and Bicycle
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Comparison of Commuters' PM10 Exposure Using Different Transportation Modes of Bus and Bicycle
Kim, Won; Kim, Sung-Yeon; Lee, Ji-Yeon; Kim, Seong-Keun; Lee, Ki-Young;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Cycling has been lately recommended as an alternative commuting mode because it is believed to be good for health and the environment. However, the exposure to environmental pollutants, such as fine particulates, could be a potential problem for cycling in urban environments. In this study, we compared commuters' exposure using the different transportation modes of bicycle and bus. When a bicycle was used as a commuting mode, the additional exposure due to transportation was about 3.5 times higher than that when using a bus. The difference of additional exposures by cycling and bus was statistically significant (p<0.01). The exposure during cycling was significantly correlated with atmospheric concentration (r=0.98, p<0.01) and its correlation coefficient was higher than that of bus (r=0.55, p<0.05). The results of this study demonstrated that the main reasons of higher exposure when using the bicycle as the mode of transport were its vicinity to road traffic and routes that were unavoidably close to road traffic. Bicycle commuting along the road side may not be good for health. Exclusive bicycle lanes away from road traffic are recommended.
 Keywords
;commuting;bicycle;bus;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
David, J. B., Kees de Hoogh, Morris, C., Gulliver, J. : Effects of travel mode on exposures to particulate air pollution. Environmental International, 34, 12-22, 2008 crossref(new window)

2.
World Health Organization : Development of WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality. Bonn Germany: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2006

3.
Zhao, L., Wang, X., He, Q., Wang, H., Sheng G., Chan, L. Y., Fu, J., Blake, D. R. : Exposure to hazardous volatile organic compounds, PM$_{10}$ and CO while walking along streets in urban Guangzhou, China. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 6177-6184, 2004 crossref(new window)

4.
Hertel, O., Hvidberg, M., Ketzel, M., Storm, L., Stausgaard, L. : A proper choice of route significantly reduces air pollution exposure-A study on bicycles and bus trips in urban streets. The Science of the Total Environment, 389, 58-70, 2008 crossref(new window)

5.
Thai, A., Mckendry, I., Brauer, M. : Particulate matter exposure along designated bicycle routes in Vancouver, British Columbia. The Science of the Total Environment, 405, 26-35, 2008 crossref(new window)

6.
Adams, H. S., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Colvile, R. N., McMullen, M. A., Khandelwal, P. : Fine particle (PM$_{2.5}$) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK. The Science of the Total Environment, 279, 29-44, 2001 crossref(new window)

7.
Gee, I. L., Rapper, D. W. : Commuter exposure to respirable particles inside buses and by bicycle. The Science of the Total Environment, 235, 403-405, 1999 crossref(new window)

8.
Rank, J., Floke, J., Per, H. J. : Differences in cyclists and car drivers exposure to air pollution from traffic in the city of Copenhagen. The Science of the Total Environment, 279, 131-136, 2001 crossref(new window)

9.
Tsai, D.-H., Wu, Y.-H., Chan, C.-C. : Comparisons of commuter's exposure to particulate matters while using different transportation modes. The Science of the Total Environment, 405, 71-77, 2008 crossref(new window)