JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Evaluation of Atopy and Its Possible Association with Indoor Bioaerosol Concentrations and Other Factors at the Residence of Children
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Evaluation of Atopy and Its Possible Association with Indoor Bioaerosol Concentrations and Other Factors at the Residence of Children
Ha, Jin-Sil; Jung, Hea-Jung; Byun, Hyae-Jeong; Yoon, Chung-Sik; Kim, Yang-Ho; Oh, In-Bo; Lee, Ji-Ho; Ha, Kwon-Chul;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Objectives: Exposure to bioaerosols in the indoor environment could be associated with a variety adverse health effects, including allergic disease such atopy. The objectives of this study were to assess children`s exposure to bioaerosol in home indoor environments and to evaluate the association between atopy and bioaerosol, environmental, and social factors in Ulsan, Korea. Methods: Samples of viable airborne bacteria and fungi were collected by impaction onto agar plates using a Quick Take TM 30 and were counted as colony forming units per cubic meter of air (CFU/). Bioaerosols were identified using standard microbial techniques by differential stains and/or microscopy. The environmental factors and possible causes of atopy based on ISAAC (International Study of Allergy and Asthma in Childhood) were collected by questionnaire. Results: The bioaerosol concentrations in indoor environments showed log-normal distribution (p < 0.01). Geometric mean (GM) and geometric standard deviation (GSD) of airborne bacteria and fungi in homes were 189.0 (2.5), 346.1(2.0) CFU/, respectively. Indoor fungal levels were significantly higher than those of bacteria (p < 0.001). The concentration of airborne bacteria exceeded the limit recommended by the Korean Ministry of Environment, 800 CFU/, in three out of 92 samples (3.3%) from 52 homes. The means of indoor to outdoor ratio (I/O) for airborne bacteria and fungi were 8.15 and 1.13, respectively. The source of airborne bacteria was not outdoors but indoors. GM of airborne bacteria and fungi were 217.6, 291.8 CFU/ in the case`s home and 162.0, 415.2 CFU/ in the control`s home respectively. The difference in fungal distributions between case and control were significant (p
 Keywords
Bioaerosol;Fungi;Bacteria;Atopic dermatitis;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
수용성 금속가공유 취급사업장에서 세균농도와 환경인자의 관계에 대한 연구,박해동;박현희;김정현;장재길;

한국산업보건학회지, 2012. vol.22. 4, pp.284-292
2.
가정 내 부유 진균의 농도와 관련 요인,조용민;류승훈;최민석;서성철;정지태;최재욱;

한국환경보건학회지, 2013. vol.39. 5, pp.438-446 crossref(new window)
3.
대학 구내식당 식품위생환경의 세균오염도 조사연구,박성준;윤현선;이수진;양민지;권보미;이정훈;고광표;

한국환경보건학회지, 2014. vol.40. 2, pp.88-97 crossref(new window)
1.
A Study on Bacterial Contamination of Cooking Environments of Food Service Operations at University, Korean Journal of Environmental Health Sciences, 2014, 40, 2, 88  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Perkins JL. Modern industrial hygiene: biological aspects. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2003.

2.
Segen JC. Concise dictionary of modern medicine. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005.

3.
Spergel JM, Paller AS. Atopic dermatitis and the atopic march. J Allergy Clin Immun. 2003; 112(6): S118-S127. crossref(new window)

4.
Jee HM, Kim KW, Kim CS, Sohn MH, Shin DC, Kim KE. Prevalence of asthma, rhinitis and eczema in Korean children using the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood (ISAAC) questionnaires. Journal of the Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease. 2009; 19(2): 165- 172.

5.
Grammatikos AP. The genetic and environmental basis of atopic diseases. Ann Med. 2008; 40(7): 482-495. crossref(new window)

6.
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). 2011 Threshold limit values (TLVs) and biological exposure indices (BEIs). ACGIH, 2011.

7.
Pastuszka JS, Kyaw Tha Paw U, Lis DO, Wlazlo A, Ulfig K. Bacterial and fungal aerosol in indoor environment in Upper Silesia, Poland. Atmospheric Environ. 2000; 34(22): 3833-3842. crossref(new window)

8.
Douwes J, Thorne P, Pearce N, Heederik D. Bioaerosol health effects and exposure assessment: progress and prospects. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003; 47(3): 187-200. crossref(new window)

9.
Peccia J, Milton DK, Reponen T, Hill J. A role for environmental engineering and science in preventing bioaerosol-related disease. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42(13): 4631-4637. crossref(new window)

10.
Flores CM, Mota LC, Green CF, Mena KD, Balcazar H, Gibbs SG. Evaluation of respiratory symptoms and their possible association with residential indoor bioaerosol concentrations and other environmental influences. J Environ Health. 2009; 72(4): 8-13.

11.
Burge HA. Fungi: toxic killers or unavoidable nuisances. Ann Allerg Asthma Im. 2001; 87(6): 52-56. crossref(new window)

12.
Bush RK, Portnoy JM. The role and abatement of fungal allergens in allergic diseases. J Allergy Clin Immun. 2001; 107(2): 430-442. crossref(new window)

13.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH manual of analytical methods, Vol. 4th Ed. DHHS Publication, 1994.

14.
Korean Ministry of Environment. Guidelines of indoor air quality. Korean Ministry of Environment: Seoul, Korea, 2006.

15.
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). OSHA Technical Manual, 1999.

16.
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Guidelines for the assessment about aerosols in the indoor environment. ACGIH: Cincinnati, Ohio, 1989.

17.
Kalogerakis N, Paschali D, Lekaditis V, Pantidou A, Eleftheriadis K, Lazaridis M. Indoor air quality-bioaerosol measurements in domestic and office premises. J Aerosol Sci. 2005; 36(5-6): 751-761. crossref(new window)

18.
Peccia J, Hernandez M. Incorporating polymerase chain reaction-based identification, population characterization, and quantification of microorganisms into aerosol science: a review. Atmospheric Environ. 2006; 40(21): 3941-3961. crossref(new window)

19.
Public Works and Government Services Canada. Indoor Air Quality, Fugal Contamination Guideline: Interpreting the Analysis, 2005.

20.
CEC (Commission for European Communities). Environment and Quality of Life; Biological. in Indoor Environment. CEC: Luxembourg, 1993.

21.
Kim KY, Jang GY, Park JB, Kim CN, Lee KJ. Field study of characteristics of airborne bacteria distributed in the regulated public facilities. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg. 2006; 16(1): 1-10.

22.
Hwang SH, Jo HW, Park DU, Yoon CS, Ryu KN, Ha KC. Levels and related factors of airborne fungi in microbial and chemistry laboratories in universities. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg. 2010; 20(1): 41-46.

23.
Chao HJ, Schwartz J, Milton DK, Burge HA. Populations and determinants of airborne fungi in large office buildings. Environ Health Persp. 2002; 110(8): 777. crossref(new window)

24.
Park JH, Spiegelman DL, Gold DR, Burge HA, Milton DK. Predictors of airborne endotoxin in the home. Environ Health Persp. 2001; 109(8): 859. crossref(new window)

25.
Wouters IM, Douwes J, Doekes G, Thorne PS, Brunekreef B, Heederik DJJ. Increased levels of markers of microbial exposure in homes with indoor storage of organic household waste. Appl Environ Microb. 2000; 66(2): 627. crossref(new window)

26.
Chen Q, Hildemann LM. The effects of human activities on exposure to particulate matter and bioaerosols in residential homes. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43(13): 4641-4646. crossref(new window)

27.
Nevalainen A, Flannigan B, Flannigan ME, Verhoeff AP, Adan OCG, Hoekstra ES. Health Implications of Fungi in Indoor Environments. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1994.

28.
de Aquino Neto FR, dw Goes Siqueira LF, Guidelines for indoor air quality in offices in Brazil. SenseAir. 2000; 4: 549-554.

29.
Ren P, Jankun TM, Leaderer BP. Comparisons of seasonal fungal prevalence in indoor and outdoor air and in house dusts of dwellings in one northeast American county1. J Expo Sci Env Epid. 1999; 9(6): 560-568. crossref(new window)

30.
Etzel RA, Montana E, Sorenson W, Kullman GJ, Allan TM, Dearborn DG, Olson D, Jarvis B, Miller J. Acute pulmonary hemorrhage in infants associated with exposure to Stachybotrys atra and other fungi. Arch Pediat Adol Med. 1998; 152: 1055- 1055.

31.
Curtis L, Lieberman A, Stark M, Rea W, Vetter M. Adverse health effects of indoor moulds. Journal of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine. 2000; 14(3): 261-274.

32.
Mui K, Wong L, Hui P. Risks of unsatisfactory airborne bacteria level in air-conditioned offices of subtropical climates. Build Environ. 2008; 43(4): 475-479. crossref(new window)

33.
Yoon SP, Kim BS, Lee JH, Lee SC, Kim YK. The environment and lifestyles of atopic dermatitis patients. Korean J Dermatol. 1999; 37(8): 983-990.

34.
Williams H. Atopic dermatitis: new information from epidemiological studies. Brit J Hosp Med. 1994; 52(8): 409-412.

35.
Lee DJ, Kim EH, Jang YH, Lee ES. Epidemiological features of childhood atopic dermatitis in Suwon. Korean J Dermatol. 2010; 48(6): 482-492.

36.
Sheikh A, Strachan DP. The hygiene theory: fact or fiction. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery. 2004; 12(3): 232-236. crossref(new window)

37.
Lee HJ. Fungi in indoor environment. Korean J Med Mycol. 1998; 3(2): 73-80.

38.
Lee JK, Lee HS, Ha JS, Park DJ, Paik DH, Ha KC. Prevalence rate and etiologic risk factors of atopic dermatitis in the preschool children in Changwon. J Environ Health Sci. 2009; 35(3): 169-177. crossref(new window)