Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Permeation Characteristics of Hazardous Substances in Tattoo Dye using Franz Diffusion Cells
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Permeation Characteristics of Hazardous Substances in Tattoo Dye using Franz Diffusion Cells
Park, Kyo-Hyun; Jung, Se-Hoon; Shin, Ho-Sang; Kim, Bae-Hwan;
  PDF(new window)
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine the exposure risk to tattoo components by analyzing skin absorption using the in vitro method. Tattoos are commonly used for cosmetic purposes, and the skin of not only the operator but of the people who are undergoing the cosmetic procedure is continuously exposed to hazardous chemicals. Methods: Skin permeation risk determination was conducted by the in vitro Franz diffusion cell method according to the ingredient types of tattoo dyes, such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), non-volatile organic compounds and heavy metals, using hairless mouse full skin and human cadaver epidermis. Results: The major components with good skin penetration for each type of tattoo dye ingredient were clarified. Among the tatto dye ingredients, 1,2-Dichlorobenzene, Zn, Al, Pb and Ti showed good skin penetration. Most of the skin transmission rates were higher in hairless mouse full skin than in human cadaver epidermis. Conclusion: A possible exposure risk to hazardous substances in tattoo dyes was confirmed from this study. These results are expected to provide a positive contribution to the establishment of management regulations for tattoo dyes.
exposure risk;Franz diffusion cell;skin absorption;tattoo dye;
 Cited by
Simon GA, Maibach HI. The pig as an experimental animal model of percutaneous permeation in man: qualitative and quantitative observations-an overview. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2000; 13(5): 229-234. crossref(new window)

Saint-Leger D, Francois AM, Leveque JL, Stoudemayer TJ, Kligman AM, Grove G. Stratum corneum lipids in skin xerosis. Dermatologica. 1988; 177(3): 151-155.

Fisher GJ, Kang S, Varani J, Bata-Csorgo Z, Wan Y, Datta S, et al. Mechanisms of photoaging and chronological skin aging. Arch Dermatol. 2002; 138(11): 1462-1470.

Chung JH, Hanft VN, Kang S. Aging and photoaging. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003; 49(4): 690-697. crossref(new window)

Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products (SCCNFP). Available:[accessed 25 February 2016].

Schmook FP, Meingassner JG, Billich A. Comparison of human skin or epidermis models with human and animal skin in in-vitro percutaneous absorption. Int J Pharm. 2001; 215(1): 51-56. crossref(new window)

Ackermann K, Borgia SL, Korting HC, Mewes KR, Schafer-Korting M. The Phenion${(R)}$ full-thickness skin model for percutaneous absorption testing. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2010; 23(2): 105-112. crossref(new window)

OECD. Available:[accessed 25 February 2016].[accessed 25 February 2016].

Lee JS, Park J, Kim SM, Yun SK, Kim HU. Basal cell carcinoma arising in a tattooed eyebrow. Ann Dermatol. 2009; 21(3): 281-284. crossref(new window)

Juhas E, Joseph C. Tattoo-associated complications. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013; 26(2): 125-129. crossref(new window)

Forte G, Petrucci F, Cristaudo A, Bocca, B. Market survey on toxic metals contained in tattoo inks. Sci Total Environ. 2009; 407(23); 5997-6002. crossref(new window)

Brown SK. Volatile organic pollutants in new and established buildings in Melbourne, Australia. Indoor Air. 2002; 12(1): 55-63. crossref(new window)

Franz TJ. On the relevance of in vitro data. J invest Dermatol. 1975; 93: 633-640.

Marzulli FN, Brown DWC, Maibach HI. Techniques for studying skin penetration. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1969; 14(3): 76-83. crossref(new window)

Barber ED, Hill T, Schum DB. The percutaneous absorption of hydroquinone (HQ) through rat and human skin in vitro. Toxicol Lett. 1995; 80(1): 167-172. crossref(new window)

Jung DC, Yoon CH, Um MS, Hwang HS, Baek JH, Choi JH. Characteristics of Percutaneous Absorption for Three Kinds of Phthalate. J Environ Health Sci. 2013; 39(4): 360-368.

Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM. Removal of cosmetic ingredients and pharmaceuticals in sewage primary treatment. Water Res. 2005; 39(19): 4790-4796. crossref(new window)

Naik A, Kalia YN, Guy RH. Transdermal drug delivery: overcoming the skin's barrier function. PSTT. 2000; 3(9): 318-326.

Mavon A, Miquel C, Lejeune O, Payre B, Moretto P. In vitro percutaneous absorption and in vivo stratum corneum distribution of an organic and a mineral sunscreen. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2007; 20(1): 10-20. crossref(new window)

Jjemba PK. Excretion and ecotoxicity of pharmaceutical and personal care products in the environment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2006; 63(1): 113-130. crossref(new window)

Handbook of Aqueous Solubility Data. Available:[accessed 25 February 2016].

Chemicals Information System. Available: [accessed 25 February 2016].

Nemes Z, Steinert PM. Bricks and mortar of the epidermal barrier. KS BMB. 1999; 31(1): 5-19.

Hong DH. The Effect of Ethanol and DMSO Concentrations on Transdermal Delivery for Zaltoprofen. [Jeonju]: Chonbuk National University; 2012.

Pappinen S, Tikkinen S, Pasonen-Seppanen S, Murtomaki L, Suhonen M, Urtti A. Rat epidermal keratinocyte organotypic culture (ROC) compared to human cadaver skin: The effect of skin permeation enhancers. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2007; 30(3): 240-250. crossref(new window)