Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Considerations on ceramic restoration`s polishing method
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Considerations on ceramic restoration`s polishing method
Shim, Ji Suk; Ryu, Jae Jun;
  PDF(new window)
Although the finishing of ceramic restorations affects overall results of prosthetic procedures, the importance of finishing procedures has been underestimated. Finishing procedures have influence on the esthetics, and strength of ceramic restorations, and attrition of opposite tooth. For achieving the appropriate results of these factors, the overall understanding related to the finishing procedures of ceramic restoration is necessary.
polishing;wear resistance;zirconia;
 Cited by
Keough B. Occlusion-based treatment planning for complex dental restorations: Part 1. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:237-47.

Keough B. Occlusion-based treatment planning for complex dental restorations: part 2. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:325-35.

Bloom DR, Padayachy JN. Aesthetic changes with four anterior units. Br Dent J 2006;200:135-8. crossref(new window)

Bloom DR, Padayachy JN. Smile lifts - a functional and aesthetic perspective. Br Dent J 2006;200:199-203. crossref(new window)

Bloom DR, Padayachy JN. Increasing occlusal vertical dimension--why, when and how. Br Dent J 2006;200:251-6. crossref(new window)

Calamia JR, Calamia CS. Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:399-417, ix. crossref(new window)

Chan C, Weber H. Plaque retention on teeth restored with full-ceramic crowns: a comparative study. J Prosthet Dent1986;56:666-71. crossref(new window)

Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, et al. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:221-7. crossref(new window)

Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist--a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater 2008;24:433-49. crossref(new window)

Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, et al. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:22-9. crossref(new window)

Odatsu T, Jimbo R, Wennerberg A, Watanabe I, Sawase T. Effect of polishing and finishing procedures on the surface integrity of restorative ceramics. Am J Dent 2013;26:51-5.

Burgess J, Janyavula S, Lawson N, Lucas T, Cakir D. Enamel Wear Opposing Polished and Aged Zirconia. Oper Dent 2013.

Kreulen CM, van't Spijker A, Kuin D, de Baat C, Creugers NH. [Contact wear related to single- and multi-unit dental prostheses]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde 2013;120:343-9.

Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:79-85.

Granell-Ruiz M, Fons-Font A, Labaig-Rueda C, et al. A clinical longitudinal study 323 porcelain laminate veneers. Period of study from 3 to 11 years. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal 2010;15:e531-7.

Goldstein RE. Finishing of composites and laminates. Dent Clin North Am 1989;33:305-18, 210-9.

Patterson CJ, McLundie AC, Stirrups DR, Taylor WG. Refinishing of porcelain by using a refinishing kit. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:383-8. crossref(new window)

Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of unglazed, glazed, and polished porcelain on human enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:320-3. crossref(new window)

Raimondo RL, Jr., Richardson JT, Wiedner B. Polished versus autoglazed dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:553-7. crossref(new window)

Scurria MS, Powers JM. Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:174-7. crossref(new window)

Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:641-52.

Miller LM. Porcelain veneer protection plan: maintenance procedures for all porcelain restorations. J Esthet Dent 1990;2:63-6. crossref(new window)