JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Improvement of FTA for Completeness, Review and Knowledge Transfer - Introducing Strategy and Context Nodes in GSN and Reason Node -
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Improvement of FTA for Completeness, Review and Knowledge Transfer - Introducing Strategy and Context Nodes in GSN and Reason Node -
Yoshioka, Nasa; Shirasaka, Seiko;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Various methods have been used for safety and reliability as it becomes more difficult to ensure safety owing to the increasing complexity and scale of systems. This study aims at making it easier and more efficient to discuss risks and countermeasures for completeness, review, and knowledge transfer by improving methods to create fault tree analyses which focus on the GSN [1], which are among the methods used to describe assurance cases. More specifically, the purpose of this study is to incorporate strategy and context, GSN concepts, along with reason, which is a new concept, into FTA; the study focuses on three points. One point is support for the safety designer to draw a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive (MECE) FTA. The second is to make it easier to understand diagrams and meanings of FTA compared with the usual methods. The third is to make creating an FTA more efficient and to pass on existing know-how. Eventually, FTA can achieve completeness, review, and knowledge transfer. An introduction is provided in the first section. Next, the methodology covered in this paper is explained in the second section. The third section describes the proposed notation method based on two proposals made in this paper. In the fourth and fifth sections, results and discussion are provided, respectively. Finally, in the sixth section, conclusions are described.
 Keywords
System engineering;System Safety;System Assurance;GSN;FTA;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Tanaka, K. "Proposal of Description Rules for Assurance case Based on Systems Engineering-Realization of Visualizing Traceability and Progressive Confirmation of Quality by Utilizing System Hierarchy," Master's thesis, March 2013.

2.
Kelly, T., and Weaver, R. "The Goal Structuring Notation - A Safety Argument Notation," DSN Workshop on Assurance Cases, 2004.

3.
Yutaka, M. "An Introduction of Assurance Cases," Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers Technical report. KBSE, Intelligence Software Engineering, January 2014.

4.
Motofumi Suzuki, Assurance Case Introduction, IPA Lecture, January 2015.

5.
Stamatelatos, M. "Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications," Version 1.1, NASA Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, August 2002.

6.
Vesely, W. E. "Fault Tree Handbook," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG-0492, January 1981.

7.
JIS Z8115:2000.

8.
Yoshimoto, A. "FTA (Fault Tree Analysis)" and Application, Institute of Electrical Engineers Magazine, UDC 621. 004.64, pp. 35, 37, 1975.

9.
Yukimachi, T. "Fault Tree Analysis and Human Factors Engineering [III]" importance measure and human error, Ergonomics Vol.13 No. 6, 0549-4974, pp. 261-270, 1977. crossref(new window)