JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Design and Evaluation of Information Broker Architecture for Network-Centric Operational Environment
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Journal of KIISE
  • Volume 43, Issue 6,  2016, pp.668-677
  • Publisher : Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers
  • DOI : 10.5626/JOK.2016.43.6.668
 Title & Authors
Design and Evaluation of Information Broker Architecture for Network-Centric Operational Environment
Park, Jejun; Kang, Dongsu;
 
 Abstract
The information superiority through effective networking is a core element that accelerates command decision for mission completion. Our military wants to acquire capabilities of effective information sharing with Network-Centric Operational Environment(NCOE) for Network-Centric Warfare (NCW). In this paper, we suggested an information broker for overcoming current limits and maximizing future expandability and possibility of information sharing capacities. The information broker, which is an intermediate layer between users and information providers, provides the functions for mediating and managing information and for ensuring security of the system. We evaluated the consistency of proposed architecture and the implementation of the operational architecture design concept using existing design frameworks.
 Keywords
Network-Centric Operational Environment(NCOE);Information Broker;Architecture;Service-Oriented Architecture(SOA);
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
ROK MND, Defense Reform Master Plan(2014-2030), R.O.K. MND, 2014.

2.
ROK MND, Defense S&T Promotion Policy, R.O.K. MND, 2014.

3.
U.S. DISA, DOD Software Transformation SOA - The Road Toward Net-Centric Operations, U.S. DISA, 2005.

4.
Dongsu Kang, Doo-Kwon Baik, "Bridging Software Product Lines and Service-Oriented Architecture for Service Identification using BPM and FM," The 9th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Science, Aug. 2010.

5.
Thomas Erl, Service-Oriented Architecture: Concepts, Technology & Design, Prentice Hall, 2005.

6.
U.S. DoD CIO, Net-Centric Services Strategy : Strategy for a Net-Centric, Service Oriented DoD Enterprise, U.S. DoD CIO, 2007.

7.
U.S. DISA, Net-Centric Enterprise Services (NCES) User Guide Version1.2, DISA, U.S., 2008.

8.
U.S. DoD. CIO, Cloud Computing Strategy, U.S., 2012.

9.
R.O.K. MND, MND-AF, Version 1.2, MND, 2007.

10.
Frankel, David S., et al., "The Zachman Framework and the OMG's Model Driven Architecture," Business Process Trends 14, 2003.

11.
Urbaczewski, Lise, and Stevan Mrdalj, "A Comparison of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks," Issues in Information Systems, pp. 18-23, 2006.

12.
O'Rourke, Fishman, Selkow, "Enterprise Architecture: Using the Zachman Framwork," Course Technology, 2003.

13.
Gartner(2009, July 9), Gartner Says Cloud Consumers Need Brokerages to Unlock the Potential of Cloud Services, [Online] Available: http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1064712 (downloaded 2016. Feb. 1)

14.
Pulkkinen, Mirja., "Systemic Management of Architectural Decisions in Enterprise Architecture Planning, Four Dimensions and Three Abstraction Levels," Proc. of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 8, IEEE, 2006.

15.
Alberts, David S., "Mission Capability Packages," National Defense Univ. Washington DC Inst. for National Strategic Studies, 1995.

16.
Dickerson, Charles, Steve Soules, "Using Architecture Analysis for Mission Capability Acquisition," Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research Development and Acquisition) Washington DC, 2002.

17.
Beryl Bellman, Ann Reedy, Prakash Rao, FEAC Certified Enterprise Architect CEA Study Guide, McGraw-Hill, 2011.