JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on the Citation Behavior by Academic Background of Researchers
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on the Citation Behavior by Academic Background of Researchers
Oh, Yu-Jin; Oh, Hyo-Jung; Kim, Chong-Hyuck; Kim, Yong;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Although it has been a long subject of study why researchers prefer some cited documents to others, the existing relative researches have had a variety of perspectives on the nature and complexity of the citation behavior and not provided a complete answer to this question. In particular, Korea researchers mainly used statistical analysis of bibliographic information, which has limitations in revealing dynamic and complex cognitive aspects of the citation process. In this study, I investigate the citer perception of citing motives and bibliographic factors through survey and compared the responses according to the researchers' characteristics. After extracting the 22 motivations and 21 factors through the literature analysis and configuring a 5-point Likert scale questions, I conducted a survey in the wat of an e-mail attachment. From the SPSS 22.0, the frequency analysis, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed on the 354 valid samples. As a result, it is found that supporting is considered the most important citing motive and social connection, self-citation have little influence. In the case of bibliographic factors, the journal's reputation was recognized the most influential factor and the number of pages and authors was the least. Significant differences in fields of study and research careers were showed in some parts. These results can substantiate earlier studies, determine whether the factors assumed influential in selecting references were intended, and suggest the search point to the specialty library or academic database.
 Keywords
citation behavior;citation motivation;bibliometrics;professional researcher;reference analysis;survey analysis;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Abt, H. A. (1993). Institutional productivities. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 105, 794-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/133232 crossref(new window)

2.
Ahmed, T., Johnson, B., Oppenheim, C., & Peck, C. (2004). Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited: Part II., The 1953 Watson and Crick article on the structure of DNA. Scientometrics, 61(2), 147-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630290504 crossref(new window)

3.
Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 829-846. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657504 crossref(new window)

4.
Baird, L. M., & Oppenheim, C. (1994). Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science, 20(1), 2-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555159402000102 crossref(new window)

5.
Beaver, D. B. (2004). Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics, 60(3), 399-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000034382.85360.cd crossref(new window)

6.
Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: an investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402 crossref(new window)

7.
Brooks, T. A. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 34-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630370106 crossref(new window)

8.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150 crossref(new window)

9.
Burrell, Q. L. (2003). Predicting future citation behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 372-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10207 crossref(new window)

10.
Camacho-Minano, M., & Nunez-Nickel, M. (2009). The multilayered nature of reference selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 754-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21018 crossref(new window)

11.
Cano, V. (1989). Citation behavior: classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(4), 284-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198907)40:4<284::aid-asi10>3.0.co;2-z crossref(new window)

12.
Choi, Seon-Heui, Kim, Byung-Kyu, Kang, MuYeong, You, Beom-Jong, Lee, Jongwook, & Park, Jae-Won (2011). A study of citing patterns of Korean scientists on Korean journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(2), 97-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.2.097 crossref(new window)

13.
Chubin, D. E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500403 crossref(new window)

14.
Cole, S. (1975). The growth of scientific knowledge: Theories of deviance as a case study. In L. A. Coser(Ed.), The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton (pp. 175-220). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

15.
Cronin, B. (1981). Agreement and divergence on referencing practice. Journal of Information Science, 3(1), 27-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555158100300104 crossref(new window)

16.
Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.

17.
Cullars, J. (1990). Citation characteristics of Italian and Spanish literary monographs. Library Quarterly, 60(1), 337-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/602265 crossref(new window)

18.
Frost, C. O. (1989). The literature of online public access catalogs. 1980-85: An analysis of citation patterns. Library Resources and Technical Services, 33(4), 344-357.

19.
Garfield, E. (1965). Can citation indexing be automated? In M. E. Stevens, V. E. Giuliano, & L. B. Heilprin (Eds.), Statistical association methods for mechanized documentation (pp. 189-192). National Bureau of Standards.

20.
Garfield, E. (1996). When to cite. Library Quarterly, 66(4), 449-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/602912 crossref(new window)

21.
Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700112 crossref(new window)

22.
Han, J., & Kwon, S. (2008). Preliminary study on bibliometric citation analysis of the oceanographic journals. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 229-234.

23.
Hanney, S., Frame, I., Grant, J., Green, P., & Buxton, M. J. (2005). From bench to bedside: Tracing the payback forwards from basic or early clinical research - a preliminary exercise and proposals for a future study. Uxbridge: The Health Economics Research Group. Brunel University.

24.
Harwood, N. (2009). Citers' use of citees' names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 1007-1011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20789

25.
Haslam, N., Ban, L., Kaufmann, L., Loughnan, S., Peters, K., Whelan, J., & Wilson., S. (2008). What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics, 76(1), 169-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1892-8 crossref(new window)

26.
Hooten, P. A. (1991). Frequency and functional use of cited documents in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(6), 397-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199107)42:6<397::aid-asi2>3.0.co;2-n crossref(new window)

27.
Hurt, C. D. (1985). Methodological citation differences in science, technology and social sciences literature. Library and Information Science Research, 7(4), 345-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(87)90033-1

28.
Kaplan, N. (1965). The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16(3), 179-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090160305 crossref(new window)

29.
Kim, Byung-kyu, Kim, Tae-jung, Kang, Mu-yeong, & You, Beom-jong (2011). A study on adding index terms for improving the retrieval efficiency of the STI database. The Korea Contents Society, 9(1), 293-294.

30.
Kim, Byung-Kyu, Kang, MuYeong, Choi, Seon-Heui, Kim, Soon-Young, You, Beom-Jong, & Shin, Jae-Do (2011). Citing behavior of Korean scientists on foreign journals in KSCD. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(2), 117-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.2.117 crossref(new window)

31.
Kim, S. (2003). A study on citation analysis of design science literature. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 233-244.

32.
Kim, Wan-Jong (2012). A study on the factors influencing citation speed and citation frequency of scientific articles using bibliometric analysis in South Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(4), 285-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2012.46.4.285 crossref(new window)

33.
Klamer, A., & van Dalen, H. P. (2002). Attention and the art of scientific publishing. Journal of Economic Methodology, 9(3), 289-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350178022000015104 crossref(new window)

34.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

35.
Lawani, S. M. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9(1), 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02016604 crossref(new window)

36.
Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20(1), 28-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.010 crossref(new window)

37.
Liu, M. (1993a). A study of citing motivation of Chinese scientists. Journal of Information Science, 19(1), 13-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555159301900103 crossref(new window)

38.
Liu, M. (1993b). Progress in documentation - the complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 370-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb026920 crossref(new window)

39.
Macroberts, M. H., & Macroberts, B. R. (1986). Quantitative measures of communication in science: a study of the formal level. Social Studies of Science, 16(1), 151-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631286016001008 crossref(new window)

40.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.

41.
Moed, H. F., & Garfield, E. (2004). In basic science the percentage of 'authoritative' references decreases as bibliographies become shorter. Scientometrics, 60(3), 295-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000034375.39385.84 crossref(new window)

42.
Moed, H. F., & Vriens, M. (1989). Possible inaccuracies occurring in citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 15(2), 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/102831538901500205 crossref(new window)

43.
Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citation. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500106 crossref(new window)

44.
Nam, Young-Joon, Seo, Hyun-Jung, & Kim, Gyu-Hwan (2011). Citing behaviors of researchers in Korea civil engineering. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 201-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.4.201 crossref(new window)

45.
Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 609-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410120 crossref(new window)

46.
Peters, H. P. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1994). On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 39-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199401)45:1<39::aid-asi5>3.0.co;2-q crossref(new window)

47.
Prabha, C. G. (1983). Some aspects of citation behavior: A pilot study in business administration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(3), 202-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630340305 crossref(new window)

48.
Rabow, H. (2005). The discovery of discoveries: Exploring the dissemination of major findings in the life sciences. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 322-326.

49.
Rousseau, R. (2000). Are multi-authored articles cited more than single-authored ones? Are collaborations with authors from other countries more cited than collaborations with in the country? A case study. In F. Havemann, R. Wagner-Döbler, & H. Krestschmer, (Eds.), Collaboration in Science and in Technology: Proceedings of the Second Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 173-176.

50.
Shadish, W. R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Sengupta, S. K. (1995). Author judgments about works they cite - three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), 477-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631295025003003 crossref(new window)

51.
Sievert, M. E., & Haughawout, M. (1989). An editor's influence on citation patterns: A case study of Elementary School Journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 334-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198909)40:5<334::aid-asi6>3.0.co;2-s crossref(new window)

52.
Snyder, H. W., & Bonzi, S. (1991). Motivations for citation: a comparison of self citation and citation to others. Scientometrics, 21(2), 245-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02017571 crossref(new window)

53.
Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989). Journal of Information Science, 24(6), 431-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551984232414

54.
Soper, M. E. (1976). Characteristics and use of personal collections. Library Quarterly, 46(4), 397-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/620584 crossref(new window)

55.
Stewart, J. A. (1983). Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles. Social Forces, 62(1), 166-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2578354 crossref(new window)

56.
Sweetland, J. H. (1989). Errors in bibliographic citations: A continuing problem. Library Quarterly, 59(4), 291-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/602160 crossref(new window)

57.
van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. E. (2005). Demographers and their journals: Who remains uncited after ten years? Population and Development Review, 30, 489-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00025.x

58.
Vinkler, P. (1987). A quasi-quantitative citation mode. Scientometrics, 12(1-2), 47-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02016689 crossref(new window)

59.
Wang, P., & White, M. D. (1996). A qualitative study of scholars' citation behavior. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 33, 255-61.

60.
Wang, P., & White, M. D. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: contributions, criteria and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67(2), 122-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/629929 crossref(new window)

61.
Wang, P., & White, M. D. (1999). A cognitive model of document use during a research project: Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 98-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:2<98::aid-asi2>3.0.co;2-l crossref(new window)

62.
White, H. D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.89 crossref(new window)

63.
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099 crossref(new window)

64.
Yeon, S. (2007). Characteristics of public administration journals by citation analysis. Korean Public Management Review, 21(3), 113-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009539979002100404

65.
Zuckerman, H. (1987). Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence. Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 329-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02016675 crossref(new window)