JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Analyzing the Research Fronts of Women's Studies in Korea Using Citation Image Makers Profiling
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Analyzing the Research Fronts of Women's Studies in Korea Using Citation Image Makers Profiling
Kim, Jo-Ah; Lee, Jae Yun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
A new technique for revealing the research fronts of a interdisciplinary discipline has been developed. Citation image makers profiling (CIMP) determines the relationships between research papers with the title words of the citing documents. We adapted this new technique to analyze the research fronts and hot topics in women's studies of Korea. By Korean Citation Index (KCI) data in 2015, we selected 148 papers cited more than 9 times as the core documents of women's studies. Analysis of intellectual structure using citation image makers profiling was performed with the 148 core documents and those citing papers. Document co-citation analysis was hindered by citation data sparsity, while CIMP method successfully revealed the structure of research fronts of Korean women's studies including 2 divisions and 6 subdivisions. The CIMP method suggested in this study has good potential to discover the characteristics of research fronts of interdisciplinary research domains.
 Keywords
domain analysis;research trends;research fronts;profiling;citation image makers profiling;women's studies;interdisciplinarity;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
강범일, 이재윤 (2014). 트위터 관련 연구에 대한 계량정보학적 분석. 정보관리학회지, 31(3), 293-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2014.31.3.293 (Kang, Beom-Il, & Lee, Jae-Yun (2014). A bibliometric analysis on Twitter research. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3), 293-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2014.31.3.293) crossref(new window)

2.
김영진 (1986). 논문의 동시인용을 통한 지적구조의 규명에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 3(1), 103-135. (Kim, Young-Jin (1986). A study on the intellectual structure using cocitation analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 3(1), 103-135.)

3.
김판준 (2011). 저자 프로파일링 기법을 이용한 국내 독서 연구 영역 분석. 한국비블리아학회지, 22(4), 21-44. (Kim, Pan-Jun (2011). Domain analysis of reading research in Korea using author profiling. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 22(4), 21-44.)

4.
김판준 (2015). 국외 독서 및 독서교육 연구동향 분석: 문헌정보학 분야를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 32(3), 69-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.3.069 (Kim, Pan-Jun (2015). An analytical study on research trends of reading and reading instruction in overseas: Focused on library and information science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(3), 69-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.3.069) crossref(new window)

5.
김판준, 이재윤 (2007). 연구 영역 분석을 위한 디스크립터 프로파일링에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(4), 285-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2007.24.4.285 (Kim, Pan-Jun, & Lee, Jae-Yun (2007). Descriptor profiling for research domain analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 24(4), 285-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2007.24.4.285) crossref(new window)

6.
김희전, 조현양 (2010). 저자동시인용분석과 저자서지결합분석에 의한 지적 구조 분석. 정보관리학회지, 27(3), 283-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2010.27.3.283 (Kim, Hee-Jeon, & Cho, Hyun-Yang (2010). A study on intellectual structure using author co-citation analysis and author bibliographic coupling analysis in the field of social welfare science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3), 283-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2010.27.3.283) crossref(new window)

7.
민형진, 안준모 (2015). 국내 IT아웃소싱분야 연구 동향 분석: 저자서지결합분석을 중심으로. 생산성논집, 29(4), 29-53. (Min, Hyoung-Jin, & An, Joon-Mo (2015). A study of IT outsourcing research trends in Korea: Utilizing author-bibliographic coupling analysis. Productivity Review, 29(4), 29-53.)

8.
박자현, 송민 (2013). 토픽모델링을 활용한 국내 문헌정보학 연구동향 분석. 정보관리학회지, 30(1), 7-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.1.007 (Park, Ja-Hyun, & Song, Min (2013). A study on the research trends in library & information science in Korea using topic modeling. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1), 7-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.1.007) crossref(new window)

9.
박지연, 정동열 (2013). 저자서지결합분석에 의한 문헌정보학의 지적구조 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 30(4), 31-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.4.031 (Park, Ji-Yeon, & Jeong, Dong-Youl (2013). A study on the intellectual structure of library and information science in Korea by author bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 31-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.4.031) crossref(new window)

10.
배은경 (2016). 젠더 관점과 여성정책 패러다임. 한국여성학, 32(1), 1-45. (Bae, Eun-Kyung (2016). Gender policy paradigm and construction of the meaning of the 'Gender Perspective': Theoretical review of the history of policy in South Korea. Journal of Korean Women's Studies, 32(1), 1-45.)

11.
송민선, 고영만 (2015). 국내 한국학 분야의 연구 영역 식별을 위한 거시적 지식구조 분석 연구. 정보관리학회지, 32(3), 221-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.3.221 (Song, Min-Sun, & Ko, Young-Man (2015). A study on the macro analysis of knowledge structure of the domestic Korean studies for identifying the research fields. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(3), 221-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.3.221) crossref(new window)

12.
유소영 (2015). 자아 중심 네트워크 분석과 동적 인용 네트워크를 활용한 토픽모델링 기반 연구동향 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 32(1), 153-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.1.153 (Yu, So-Young (2015). Combining ego-centric network analysis and dynamic citation network analysis to topic modeling for characterizing research trends. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(1), 153-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.1.153) crossref(new window)

13.
유종덕, 최은주 (2011). 저자프로파일링분석과 저자동시인용분석의 유용성 비교 검증. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 123-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.1.123 (Ryoo, Jong-duk, & Choi, Eun-Ju (2011). A comparison test on the potential utility between author profiling analysis (APA) and author co-citation analysis (ACA). Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1), 123-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.1.123) crossref(new window)

14.
유지영, 우수한 (2015). 저자서지결합분석을 이용한국내 물류학의 지적구조 분석에 관한 연구. 물류학회지, 25(3), 13-24. (Yoo, Ji-Young, & Woo, Su-Han (2015). Analysis on intellectual structure of logistics research in Korea using author bibliographic coupling analysis. Korea Logistics Review, 25(3), 13-24.)

15.
이나영 (2011). 한국 '여성학'의 위치성: 미완의 제도화와 기회구조의 변화. 한국여성학, 27(4), 37-81. (Lee, Na-Young (2011). The positionality of women's studies: Incomplete institutionalization and changes in opportunity structure. Journal of Korean Women's Studies, 27(4), 37-81.)

16.
이명옥 (1996). 저자동시인용 분석을 이용한 여성연구의 특성 및 동향. 한국여성학, 12(1), 180-203. (Lee, Myoung-Ok (1996). Major themes and trends in Korean women's studies: The results of author co-citation analysis. Journal of Korean Women's Studies, 12(1), 180-203.)

17.
이수상 (2014). 언어 네트워크 분석 방법을 활용한 학술논문의 내용분석. 정보관리학회지, 31(4), 49-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2014.31.4.049 (Lee, Soo-Sang (2014). A content analysis of journal articles using the language network analysis methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4), 49-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2014.31.4.049) crossref(new window)

18.
이재윤 (2006). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 새로운 클러스터링 기법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 215-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2006.23.4.215 (Lee, Jae-Yun (2006). A novel clustering method for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(4), 215-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2006.23.4.215) crossref(new window)

19.
이재윤 (2008). 서지적 저자결합분석: 연구동향 분석을 위한 새로운 접근. 정보관리학회지, 25(1), 173-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2008.25.1.173 (Lee, Jae-Yun (2008). Bibliographic author coupling analysis: A new methodological approach for identifying research trends. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(1), 173-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2008.25.1.173) crossref(new window)

20.
이재윤 (2012a). 자기 인용 네트워크와 인용 정체성을 이용한 연구자의 연구 이력 분석에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 29(1), 157-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2012.29.1.157 (Lee, Jae-Yun (2012a). Exploring a researcher's personal research history through self-citation network and citation identity. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(1), 157-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2012.29.1.157) crossref(new window)

21.
이재윤 (2012b). 폭소노미 연구 문헌에 대한 자아 중심 주제 인용 분석. 정보관리학회지, 29(4), 295-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2012.29.4.295 (Lee, Jae Yun (2012b). Ego-centered topic citation analysis on folksonomy research documents. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(4), 295-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2012.29.4.295) crossref(new window)

22.
이재윤 (2013). tnet과 WNET의 가중 네트워크 중심성 지수 비교 연구. 정보관리학회지, 30(4), 241-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.4.241 (Lee, Jae-Yun (2013). A comparison study on the weighted network centrality measures of tnet and WNET. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 241-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.4.241) crossref(new window)

23.
이재윤 (2015). 문헌동시인용 분석을 통한 한국 문헌정보학의 연구 전선 파악. 정보관리학회지, 32(4), 77-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.4.077 (Lee, Jae-Yun (2015). Identifying the research fronts in Korean library and information science by document co-citation analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(4), 77-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.4.077) crossref(new window)

24.
조주현 (2000). 한국여성학의 지식생산구조와 향방. 한국여성학, 16(2), 145-174. (Cho, Joo-hyun (2000). Knowledge production structure and prospects of Korean women's studies: The case of Han'guk Yeoseonghak. Journal of Korean Women's Studies, 16(2), 145-174.)

25.
허고은, 송민 (2013). 저자동시인용 분석과 동시출현단어 분석을 이용한 의료정보학 저널의 지적구조 분석. 정보관리학회지, 30(2), 207-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.2.207 (Heo, Go-Eun, & Song, Min (2013). Examining the intellectual structure of a medical informatics journal with author co-citation analysis and co-word analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(2), 207-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.2.207) crossref(new window)

26.
Kim, Hyun-Jung (2014). The JASIST editorial board members' research areas and keywords of JASIST research articles. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3), 227-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2014.31.3.227 crossref(new window)

27.
Kim, Su-Yeon, Song, Sung-Jeon, & Song, Min (2015). Investigation of topic trends in computer and information science by text mining techniques. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(1), 135-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.1.135 crossref(new window)

28.
Lee, J. Y., Kim, H., & Kim, P. J. (2010). Domain analysis with text mining: Analysis of digital library research trends using profiling methods. Journal of Information Science, 36(2), 144-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551509353251 crossref(new window)

29.
Nebelong-Bonnevie, E., & Frandsen, T. F. (2006). Journal citation identity and journal citation image: A portrait of the Journal of Documentation. Journal of Documentation, 62(1), 30-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410610642039 crossref(new window)

30.
Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. New York: Ablex Publishing.

31.
Seo, E. G., & Yu, S. Y. (2013). Detecting research trends in Korean information science research, 2000-2011. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 215-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.4.215 crossref(new window)

32.
Small, H. G. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406 crossref(new window)

33.
White, H. D. (2000). Toward ego-centered citation analysis. In B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 475-496). Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, Inc.