JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Students’ Thought Patterns on Problem and Problem Solving in the Course of General Chemistry
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Students’ Thought Patterns on Problem and Problem Solving in the Course of General Chemistry
Lee, Seon Gyeong; Park, Hyeon Ju;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study was to explore students` thought patterns on problem and problem solving in the course of general chemistry. The participants were 9 students taking the course of general chemistry in a university in Seoul. Data were collected from various sources; three individual interviews, classroom observations, and essays written by students.Data were all transcribed and then analyzed circularly in constant component analysis. As the results of this study, six thought patterns of students in the context of learning general chemistry were presented. These thought patterns were common and existed important component within most of students` conceptual ecologies about learning chemistry. Implications of chemistry and science learning related to this results were discussed.
 Keywords
Conceptual Change;Conceptual Ecology;Conception;Thought Pattern;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
von Glasersfeld, E. Syntheses, 1989, 80, 121-140. crossref(new window)

2.
Eylon, B.-S.; Linn, M. C. Review of EducationalResearch, 1988, 58, 251-301. crossref(new window)

3.
Demasters, S. S.; Good, R. G.; Peebles, P. Science Education,1995, 79, 637-666. crossref(new window)

4.
Hesse, J. J.; Anderson, C. W. Journal of Research inScience Teaching. 1992, 29, 277-299. crossref(new window)

5.
Posner, G. J.; Strike, K. A.; Hewson, P. W.; Gertzog, W.A. Science Education, 1982, 66, 211-227. crossref(new window)

6.
Pintrich, P. R.; Max, W. M.; Boyle, R. A. Review ofEducational Research, 1993, 63, 167-199. crossref(new window)

7.
Tyson, L. M.; Venville, G. J.; Harrison, A. G. ScienceEducation, 1997, 81, 387-403. crossref(new window)

8.
Strike, K. A.; Posner, G. J. In Philosophy of science,cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice;Duschl, R. A.; Hamilton, R. J., Eds.; State Universityof New York Press: New York, U.S.A., 1992.147-176.

9.
Hewson, M. G. A'B. European Journal of Science Education,1984, 6, 245-262. crossref(new window)

10.
Thorley, N. R. The role of the conceptual change modelin the interpretation classroom interactions; Universityof Wisconsin-Madison: Wisconsin-Madison, U.S.A. 1990.

11.
Hewson, P. W.; Tabachnick, B. R.; Zeichner, K. M.; Blomker,K. B.; Meyer, H.; Lemberger, J.; Marion, R.; Park, H.; Toolin,R. Science Education, 1999, 83, 247-273. crossref(new window)

12.
Hewson, et al. National Association For Research in Science Teaching. 156. 2002.

13.
Jeon, K. M.; Seo, K. H.; Noh, T. H. Journal of theKorean Chemical Society 2001, 45, 370.

14.
Noh, T. H.; Jeon, K. M. Chemical Education 1996, 23, 102.

15.
Noh, T. H.; Jeon, K. M.; Han, I. O.; Kim, C. M. J. of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 1996, 16, 389.

16.
Noh, T.; Scharmann, L. C. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching 1997, 34, 199. crossref(new window)

17.
Tingle, J. B.; Good, R. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching 1990, 27, 671. crossref(new window)

18.
Bunce, D. M.; Gable, D. L.; Samuel, J. V. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching 1991, 28, 505. crossref(new window)