JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Analysis of the Analogies on Three States of Matter Generated by Middle School Students
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Analysis of the Analogies on Three States of Matter Generated by Middle School Students
Hyeoksoon Kwon; Eunkyu Choi; Taehee Noh;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study investigated the types of analogies that 7th graders generated to explain three states of matter, the difference of analogies by achievement level, and the misconceptions that might be induced from the analogies. The results revealed that many students made the enriched and storytelling analogies with concrete materials or events from their everyday experiences. However, they made analogies without considering causal relationship such as the change of particular arrangement based on latent heat or molecular movement. The students of high achievement level considered the arrangement and the movement of molecules and made the enriched and storytelling analogies more than the students of low achievement level. The students made the analogies that might induce misconceptions such that the molecules don't move in solid state or the particles could be changed according to the states.
 Keywords
Analogy; Student-Generated Analogy; Three States of Matter; Achievement Level; Misconception;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
비유 만들기를 활용한 반응속도 개념 학습에서 학생들이 만든 비유의 유형과 대응 관계 이해도 및 대응 오류 조사,김경순;황선영;노태희;

대한화학회지, 2008. vol.52. 4, pp.412-422 crossref(new window)
2.
크로마토그래피 개념에 대해 중학교 과학영재가 만든 비유의 유형과 대응 오류 및 비유 만들기 활동에 대한 인식 조사,김유정;문세정;노태희;

한국과학교육학회지, 2009. vol.29. 8, pp.861-873
3.
초등학생의 학습접근양식에 따른 비유 만들기 특성, 대응 관계 이해도, 대응 오류, 비유 만들기에 대한 인식,강훈식;천지현;

한국과학교육학회지, 2010. vol.30. 5, pp.668-680
4.
과학영재의 비유 만들기 과정에서 나타난 심상적 사고의 특성,양찬호;박원;김유정;최길순;노태희;

대한화학회지, 2011. vol.55. 5, pp.846-856 crossref(new window)
1.
The Characteristics of Imagery Thinking in the Processes of Science-Gifted Students' Generating Analogy, Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2011, 55, 5, 846  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Duit, R. Science Education, 1991, 75, 649. crossref(new window)

2.
Dagher, Z. R. Science Education, 1994, 78, 601. crossref(new window)

3.
Pittman, K. M. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,1999, 36, 1. crossref(new window)

4.
Thiele, R. B.; Treagust, D. F. Using analogies in secondarychemistry teaching. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the American Educational ResearchAssociation, Perth, Western Australia, 1991.

5.
Wong, E. D. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,1993, 30, 367. crossref(new window)

6.
Glynn, S. Effects of instruction to generate analogieson students' recall of science text, Reading ResearchReport No. 60. Athens, GA: National Reading Researchcenter, 1996.

7.
Wittrock, M. C.; Alesandrini, K. American EducationalResearch Journal, 1990, 27, 489. crossref(new window)

8.
Middleton, J. L. The American Biology Teacher, 1991,53, 42. crossref(new window)

9.
Mason, L. Collaborative reasoning on self-generated analogies: Conceptual growth in understanding scientific phenomena. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, 1995.

10.
Boujaoude, S.; Tammim, R. School Science Review,2000, 82, 57.

11.
Wong, D. E.. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,1993, 30(10), 1259. crossref(new window)

12.
Kaufman, D. R., Patel, V. L., & Magder, S. A. InternationalJournal of Science Education, 1996, 18(3), 369. crossref(new window)

13.
Stavy, R. International Journal of Science Education,1988, 10, 553. crossref(new window)

14.
Pereira, M. P.; Pestana, M. E. M. International Journalof Science Education, 1991, 13, 313. crossref(new window)

15.
Thiele, R. B.; G. J. Venville, et al. Research in ScienceEducation, 1995, 25(2), 221. crossref(new window)

16.
노태희; 권혁순; 김동연; 채우기. 화학교육, 1997, 24, 1.

17.
Gentner, D., & Toupin, C. Cognitive Science, 1986, 10, 277. crossref(new window)

18.
Hsu, C.-L. L. Content emphasis, practice, and cognitivestyle in analogical problem solving of college students.Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Universityof Missori-Columbia, 1993.

19.
Thiele, R. B.; Treagust, D. F. Journal of Research inScience, 1994, 31, 227.

20.
Duit, R.; Komorek, M.; Wilbers, J.; Roth, W. Conceptualchange during a unit on chaos theory induced bymeans of analogies. Paper presented at the AnnualMeeting of the National Association for Research inScience Teaching, 1997.

21.
Gabel, D. L.; Sherwood, R. D. Science Education, 1980,64, 709. crossref(new window)

22.
Flick, L. Science Education, 1991, 75, 215. crossref(new window)

23.
Tsai, C. -C. Journal of Science and Technology, 1999,8, 83.