JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on the Feature of Chemistry Education Through Analyzing into the Chemistry Textbooks Published in the Enlightenment Period in Korea
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on the Feature of Chemistry Education Through Analyzing into the Chemistry Textbooks Published in the Enlightenment Period in Korea
Park, Jong-Seok;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Characteristics of chemistry education during the enlightenment period in Korea are examined by analyzing chemistry textbooks used in the period. Specifically, the analysis is made from the aspects of science, students and teachers. As a result it is found that; first, scientific knowledge itself is emphasized, contrary to those described in the curriculum of chemistry used in the period, and it consists of introduction, non-metals, metals and organic chemistry in chemistry textbook, second, the level of chemistry is similar with that in present high schools, and its technical constitution might have been difficult for a student to study with an experiment, third, terminology lacks consistency and some textbooks include contents of other subject. It is therefore believed that the chemistry textbooks of the enlightenment period is scientifically incomplete and would not have been easy for the teachers to use them to teach the students. In addition, considering the students as a beginner of modern sciences, study level could have been too difficult for them to follow. In conclusion, it appears that chemistry education during the enlightenment period in Korea was not so successful.
 Keywords
Enlightenment Period;Chemistry Textbook;Chemistry Education;Analyzing The Chemistry Textbooks;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
손인수. 한국근대교육사. 연세대학교출판부: 서울, 1984.

2.
교육부. 제7차 교육과정에 다른 2종 교과용도서 집필상의 유의점. 교육부: 서울, 1999.

3.
Romey, D. W. Inquiry techniques for teaching science. Prentice-Hall. 1968.

4.
중앙교육연구소. 교과서 내용 분석과 행정 개선에 관한 연구. 과학기술처. 1969.

5.
한종하. 실험용 교과서의 적절성, 타당성, 효용성은 어떻게 검증되어야 하는가(과학교과를 중심으로). 미발간 유인물. 1981.

6.
송진웅. 고등학교 물리교과서의 분석. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. 1985.

7.
오대섭; 이선행; 최순홍; 이규옥. 화학교육. 1989, 16(1). 14-23.

8.
박종석. 개화기 과학교과서의 발간실태와 내용 분석. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문. 1998.

9.
관보 1895년 7월 27일자

10.
관보 1906년 9월 1일자

11.
관보 1906년 9월 3일자

12.
관보 1909년 7월 9일자

13.
관보 1909년 7월 9일자

14.
安衡中. 新編化學. 普成館. 1907.

15.
洪仁杓. 化學敎科書. 私立普成中學校. 1907.

16.
柳鎭永; 具滋興. 新撰中等無機化學. 唯一書館. 1910.

17.
윤 용; 정지오; 박종석; 김영호. 화학II. 교학사:서울, 2004.

18.
한국교육개발원. 한국 근대 학교교육 100년사 연구(I). 한국교육개발원. 1994.