JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Science-Gifted Class Students` Change in Creative Personality and Creative Thinking Ability and Comparison to General Class Students in the First Grade of High School
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Science-Gifted Class Students` Change in Creative Personality and Creative Thinking Ability and Comparison to General Class Students in the First Grade of High School
Kim, Hyung-Do; Kim, Dong-Jin; Park, Kwang-Seo; Kim, Eun-Suk; Jin, Dong-Joo; Park, Kuk-Tae;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this study was to find out whether scientifically creative students were selected as science-gifted class students and whether their creativity improved after class for the science-gifted students by comparing the science gifted class students to general class students in the first grade of high school. This was achieved by comparing science-gifted class students with general ones on creative personality and creative thinking ability. For this study, science-gifted class students and general class students were surveyed using Khatena-Torrance creative perception inventory and Torrance test of creative thinking with words of form A, before and after class for the science-gifted group. The results showed that science-gifted class students scored significantly higher than general class students on the creative personality. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in their creative thinking ability. Also, in this study, the sub-factors of creative personality and those of creative thinking ability showed very low levels of correlation, which implies that the two variables are highly independent. In addition, science-gifted class students did not show significant improvement in their scores on the creative personality and the creative thinking ability after class. Therefore, further research and development on the selection of science-gifted students and teaching-learning methods which can improve the creativity of these students are needed.
 Keywords
Science-gifted Students;Creative Personality;Creative Thinking Ability;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
중학교 일반학급과 영재학급의 과학수업에서 교사와 학생사이의 언어적 상호작용 비교 분석,이지향;김동진;황현숙;박세열;백인환;박국태;

영재교육연구, 2010. vol.20. 3, pp.721-741
2.
중학교 영재학급에서 사용 중인 화학영역의 과학영재 교수-학습 프로그램의 분석,조윤향;김동진;황현숙;박세열;양경은;박국태;

영재교육연구, 2011. vol.21. 2, pp.485-510 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
최취임; 정민수; 홍훈기; 채희권; 정대홍 대한화학회지 2008, 52, 295

2.
박춘성; 김동일 열린교육연구 2007, 5, 47

3.
이기영; 김찬종 한국지구과학교육학회지 2005, 26, 511

4.
권치순 초등과학교육 2005, 24, 192

5.
김지영; 하지희; 박국태; 강성주 영재교육연구 2008, 18, 1

6.
Oh, C.-H. Development of the inquiry model for science-gifted students based on the scientists' practical research process. Ph.D. Thesis, Korea National University of Education: Chungbuk, Korea, 2008

7.
심규철; 김현섭 한국생물교육학회지 2007, 35, 101

8.
주희영; 동효관; 김성하; 김희백; 이길재 한국생물교육학회지 2006, 34, 257

9.
김소형; 박재일; 정진수; 이혜정; 권용주; 박국태 초등과학교육 2005, 24, 1

10.
서혜애; 손연아; 김경진 영재교육기관 교수-학습 실태연구(CR 2003-26); 한국교육개발원: 서울, 2003

11.
송인섭; 한기순 한국영재교육의 새로운 지평;학지사: 서울, 2008

12.
Terman, L. M. Genetic studies of genius. The mental and physical trait of a thousand gifted children, Vol. 1; Stanford University Press: Stanford, U. S. A., 1925

13.
김정휘 교육연구 1987, 5, 139

14.
양태영; 배미란; 한기순; 박인호 한국과학교육학회지 2003, 25, 531

15.
Guilford, J. P. Psychological Review 1982, 89, 48 crossref(new window)

16.
Marland, S. P. Education of the gifted and talented;U. S. Government Printing Office: Washington D.C., U. S. A., 1972

17.
Renzulli, J. S. Phi Delta Kappan 1978, 59, 180

18.
Gardner, H. Frames of minds: The theory of multiple intelligence; Basic Books: New York, U.S. A., 1983

19.
Sternberg, R. J. Intelligence applied: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills;Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: San Diago, U. S. A.,1986

20.
Sternberg, R. J. High Ability Studies 2003, 14, 109-137 crossref(new window)

21.
신지은; 한기순; 정현철; 박병건; 최승언 한국과학교육학회지 2002, 22, 158

22.
Amabile, T. M. Growing up creative; Crown Publisher Inc: New York, U. S. A., 1989

23.
Csikzentmihalyi, M.; Wolfe, R. In Handbook of creativity; R. J. Sternberg, Ed.; Harpercollins:New York, U. S. A., 2000

24.
서혜애 교육개발 2000, 10, 93

25.
정종진 초등교육 연구논총 2003, 18, 93

26.
이경화 영재와 영재교육 2002, 1, 47

27.
박주용; 오현숙 한국심리학회지: 사회문제 2005, 1, 143

28.
이기영; 동효관; 홍준의; 김현경; 조봉제 한국과학교육학회지 2008, 28, 32

29.
윤경미; 김정섭 교육심리연구 2006, 20, 587

30.
Cardellini L. J. Chem. Educ. 2005, 82, 751 crossref(new window)

31.
http://ksan.hs.kr

32.
http://isep.incheon.ac.kr

33.
http://gifted.inha.ac.kr/EduIntro/EduPrgm/EduPrgm.asp

34.
http://cge.ajou.ac.kr/eduinfo/eduinfo3.asp

35.
http://www.ice.go.kr

36.
Khatena, J.; Torrance, E. P. Khatena-Torrance creative perception inventory; Stoelting: Chicago, U. S. A., 1976

37.
김영채 Torrance 창의력 검사 TTCT (언어, A형)검사 요강; 토랜스 창의력 한국 FPSP: 대구, 한국, 2002

38.
Miller, T. L. J. Chem. Educ. 1993, 70, 187 crossref(new window)

39.
최인수 유아교육연구 2000, 20, 139

40.
Almeida, L. S.; Prietob, L. P.; Ferrando, M.;Oliveira, E.; Ferrándiz, C. Thinking Skills and Creativity 2008, 3, 53 crossref(new window)

41.
http://www.indiana.edu/~bobweb/Handout/d3.ttct.htm

42.
http://gifted.kedi.re.kr

43.
김영채 교육학연구 2001, 39, 119

44.
조은부; 백성혜 한국과학교육학회지 2006, 26, 307

45.
김영채; 전현선; 박권생 교육학연구 2002, 40, 29

46.
Buono, J. A.; Fasching, J. L. J. Chem. Educ. 1973, 9, 616