JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Students` Comprehension and Interpretation Process of InscriptionsRepresenting the Concept of Atom and Molecule
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Students` Comprehension and Interpretation Process of InscriptionsRepresenting the Concept of Atom and Molecule
Noh, Tae-Hee; Yoon, Mi-Suk; Han, Jae-Young;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In this study, the 9th grade students were interviewed to explore their comprehension and interpretation processes of inscriptions representing the concept of atom and molecule. We used a semiotic model for the interview and the analysis of result. The research result revealed that the students performed structuring processes of interpreting inscriptions successfully, but they had a difficulty with translating processes for attaining the target concept or for connecting an inscription with another inscription. Translating processes of connecting inscription with text showed a different result according to achievement level of each student. On the other hand, all the interviewees showed similar sequences in the processes of interpreting inscriptions. Educational implications of these findings were discussed.
 Keywords
Atom;olecule;nscription;nterpretation process;emiotics;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
Learning Progression을 적용한 중·고등학생의 '물질의 입자성'에 관한 지식과 미시적 표상에 대한 특성 분석,신남수;고은정;최취임;정대홍;

한국과학교육학회지, 2014. vol.34. 5, pp.437-447 crossref(new window)
2.
판 구조론 학습에 사용되는 시각적 표상이 판구조론 개념에 대한 고등학생들의 응답에 미치는 영향,이미숙;정진우;김형범;

대한지구과학교육학회지, 2014. vol.7. 2, pp.214-225 crossref(new window)
3.
고등학생들의 판 구조론에 대한 개념 분석,이미숙;정진우;김형범;

한국지구과학회지, 2014. vol.35. 6, pp.484-497 crossref(new window)
1.
The Analysis of High School Students' Conceptions on Plate Tectonics, Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2014, 35, 6, 484  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Using a Learning Progression to Characterize Korean Secondary Students' Knowledge and Submicroscopic Representations of the Particle Nature of Matter, Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education, 2014, 34, 5, 437  crossref(new windwow)
3.
The Effect of Visual Representation in Plate Tectonics Topics on High School Students' Conceptions on Plate Tectonics, Journal of the Korean society of earth science education, 2014, 7, 2, 214  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Han, J.; Roth, W. M. Science Education 2006, 90, 173 crossref(new window)

2.
Wu, H. K.; Shah, P. Science Education 2004, 88, 465 crossref(new window)

3.
Bowen G. M.; Roth, W. M. Research in Science Education 2002, 32, 303 crossref(new window)

4.
Roth, W. M.; McGinn, M. K. Review of Educational Research 1998, 68, 33

5.
Roth, W. M.; Bowen, G. M.; McGinn, M. K. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1999, 36, 977 crossref(new window)

6.
Gilbert, J. K. Visualization in science education; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2005

7.
Gabel, D. L.; Samuel, K. V.; Hunn, D. Journal of Chemical Education 1987, 64, 695 crossref(new window)

8.
de Vos, W.; Verdonk, A. H. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1996, 33, 657 crossref(new window)

9.
Harrison, A. G.; Treagust, D. F. In Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice; Gilbert, J. K., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2002; p 189

10.
Taber, K. S. Foundations of Chemistry 2003, 5, 43 crossref(new window)

11.
교육부 과학과 교육과정; 대한 교과서 주식회사: 서울, 한국, 1997

12.
교육부 중학교 교육과정 해설(III); 대한 교과서주식회사: 서울, 한국, 1998

13.
노태희; 윤미숙; 강훈식; 한재영 대한화학회지 2007, 51, 423

14.
Eco, U. Semiotics and the philosophy of language; Indiana University Press: Bloomington, U. S. A., 1984

15.
박수희 교육용 게임의 기호학적 분석: 퍼스의 기호학을 중심으로; 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문, 2005

16.
김경용 기호학이란 무엇인가: 기호의 우리, 우리의 기호; 민음사: 서울, 한국, 2005

17.
Lemke, J. In Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science; Martin, J. R., Veel, R., Eds.; Routledge: London, U. K., 1998

18.
Bastide, F. In Representation in scientific practice; Lynch, M., Woolgar, S., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, U. S. A., 1990

19.
Pozzer, L. L.; Roth, W. M. Science Education 2005, 89, 219 crossref(new window)

20.
Roth, W. M.; Pozzer-Ardenghi, L.; Han, J. Critical graphicacy: Understanding visual representation practice in school science; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2005

21.
한재영 초등과학교육 2006, 25, 244

22.
이용숙; 김영천 교육에서의 질적 연구: 방법과 적용; 교육과학사: 서울, 한국, 1998

23.
Guba, E.; Lincoln, Y. Fourth generation evaluation; Sage: Beverly Hills, U. S. A., 1989

24.
한문정 연소와 녹스는 현상에 대한 학생들의 개념 조사; 서울대학교 석사학위논문, 1990

25.
백성혜; 류오현; 김동욱 박국태 대한화학회지 2001, 45, 357

26.
류오현; 백성혜; 김동욱 대한화학회지 2004, 48, 53

27.
Ainsworth, S. Learning and instruction 2006, 16, 183 crossref(new window)