JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Relationship between Students' Out-of-school Science Experience and Their View on the Nature of Science
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Relationship between Students' Out-of-school Science Experience and Their View on the Nature of Science
Kang, Suk-Jin;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In this study, the relationship between students' out-of-school science experience and their view on the nature of science was investigated. The participants were 267 sixth graders, 281 eighth graders, and 307 tenth graders from schools in Seoul. A test of views on the nature of science which consists of five items concerning the purpose of science, the definition of scientific theory, the nature of scientific model, the tentativeness of scientific theory, and the origin of scientific theory was administered. Students' out-of-school science experiences were measured with a subscale of the modified Science Experience Survey consisting of seven items. The results indicated that no statistically significant relationship was found between students' out-of-school science experience and their view on the nature of science in sixth graders. In eighth graders, high level students in terms of out-of-school science experiences were found to possess more contemporarily epistemological view in the item concerning the nature of scientific model but more falsificationist view in the item concerning the tentativeness of scientific theory. High level tenth graders in terms of out-of-school science experiences exhibited more epistemologically sophisticated understandings of the nature of science than their counterparts in the items concerning the purpose of science, the definition of scientific theory, and the nature of scientific model.
 Keywords
Out-of-school science experience;Nature of science;Elementary school student;Middle school student;High school student;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Meichtry, Y. J. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1992, 29(4), 389. crossref(new window)

2.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Science Curriculum; Ministry of Education, Science and Technology: Seoul, 2011.

3.
Noh, T.; Kim, Y.; Han, S.; Kang, S. J. Korea Assoc. Sci. Edu. 2002, 22(4), 882.

4.
Akerson, V.; Donnelly, L. A. International Journal of Science Education 2010, 32(1), 97. crossref(new window)

5.
Kang, S.; Scharmann, L. C.; Noh, T. Science Education 2004, 89(2), 314.

6.
Moss, D. M.; Abrams, M. D.; Kull, J. A. Journal of Science Education and Technology 1998, 7(2), 149. crossref(new window)

7.
Abd-El-Khalick, F.; Lederman, N. G. International Journal of Science Education 2000, 22(7), 665. crossref(new window)

8.
Akerson, V. L.; Abd-El-Khalick, F.; Lederman, N. G. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2000, 37(4), 295. crossref(new window)

9.
Kim, K.; Noh, J.; Seo, I.; Noh, T. J. Korea Assoc. Sci. Edu. 2008, 28(1), 89.

10.
Kim, J.-N.; Kim, S.-K.; Kim, D.-U.; Kim, H.-K.; Paik, S.-H. Elementary Science Education 2008, 27(3), 261.

11.
Bang, M.; Kim, H.-N. Elementary Science Education 2010, 29(3), 277.

12.
Akerson, V. L.; Volrich, M. L. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2006, 43(4), 377. crossref(new window)

13.
Khishfe, R.; Abd-El-Khalick, F. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2002, 39(7), 551. crossref(new window)

14.
Noh, T.; Kang, S.; Lee, S. Journal of the College of Education, Seoul National University 1997, 55, 89.

15.
Newton, L. D.; Newton, D. P. International Journal of Science Education 1998, 20(9), 1137. crossref(new window)

16.
Song, J.; Kim, K. S. International Journal of Science Education 1999, 21(9), 957. crossref(new window)

17.
Robottom, I. The Australian Science Teachers Journal 1992, 38(2), 19.

18.
Aikenhead, G. S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1988, 25(8), 607. crossref(new window)

19.
Wellington, J. Physics Education 1990, 25(5), 247. crossref(new window)

20.
Schibeci, R. A. Science Education 1989, 73(1), 13. crossref(new window)

21.
Wellington, J. International Journal of Science Education 1991, 13(4), 363. crossref(new window)

22.
National Science Foundation Elementary, secondary, and informal education program announcement and guidelines; National Science Foundation: Washington, D.C., 1998.

23.
Pedretti, E. Studies in Science Education 2002, 37(1), 1.

24.
Bell, P.; Lewenstein, B.; Shouse, A. W.; Feder, M. A. Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits; National Academic Press: Washington, D.C., 2009.

25.
Lederman, N. G. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1992, 29(4), 331. crossref(new window)

26.
Mason, C. L.; Kahle, J. B. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1988, 26(1), 25.

27.
Farenga, S. J.; Joyce, B. A. Education 1997, 117(4), 563.

28.
Ryan, A. G.; Aikenhead, G. S. Science Education 1992, 76(6), 559. crossref(new window)

29.
Duschl, R. A. Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development; Teachers College Press: New York, 1990.

30.
Grosslight, L.; Unger, C.; Jay, E.; Smith, C. L. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1991, 28(9), 799. crossref(new window)

31.
Solomon, J.; Scott, L.; Duveen, J. Science Education 1996, 80(5), 493. crossref(new window)

32.
Elder, A. D. Characterizing fifth-grade students' epistemological beliefs in science. In Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing; Hofer, B. K.; Pintrich, P. R., Eds.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, 2002; pp 347-363.

33.
Tamir, P. Research in Science and Technological Education 1994, 12(2), 99. crossref(new window)

34.
Lederman, N. G.; O'Malley, M. Science Education 1990, 74(2), 225. crossref(new window)

35.
Stein, S. J.; McRobbie, C. J. Research in Science Education 1997, 27(4), 611. crossref(new window)

36.
Martin, L. M. W. Science Education 2004, 88 (Suppl. 1), S71. crossref(new window)

37.
Kim, C.; Shin, M.; Lee, S. Understanding informal science learning; Bookshill: Seoul, 2010.