JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Impact of Self-Reported Knowledge and Self-perceived Importance about Earth Systems on Science Gifted Students' Science Motivation: An Exploratory Study
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Impact of Self-Reported Knowledge and Self-perceived Importance about Earth Systems on Science Gifted Students' Science Motivation: An Exploratory Study
Oh, Jun-Young; Lee, Hyundong; Lee, Hyonyong;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation among science gifted students' self-reported knowledge and self-perceived importance about Earth systems, and their science motivation. Ninety three seventh graders participated in this study who enrolled at Science Gifted Institute of K university. The correlation was measured by a validated Earth systems survey and Science Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ). The data were analyzed at the margin of error probability 0.05 using correlation and regression analysis. The result of reliability for items turned out high because the Cronbach's alphas were .896~.937. Results indicated that the correlation between self-reported knowledge on Earth systems and science motivation showed a correlation coefficient .656, whereas the correlation between importance on Earth systems and science motivation was .387, which was regarded as low. On the other hands, the result of regression analysis depicted that non-std. coefficients between students' self-reported knowledge about Earth systems and science motivation were .548 (.077), which lead to the conclusion that students' knowledge on Earth systems explained 43% of science motive-variation. It implied that Earth systems education program could impact the increased motivation of science gifted-students. Therefore, this study suggests that the various Earth systems education programs could be developed and implemented in order to increase students' motivation on studying science in general and Earth science in specific.
 Keywords
Earth systems;science motivation;science gifted student;knowledge and importance of Earth systems;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Ben-zvi-Assaraf, O. and Orion, N., 2005a, A study of junior high students' perceptions of the water cycle. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 366-373.

2.
Ben-zvi-Assaraf, O. and Orion, N., 2005b, Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 518-560. crossref(new window)

3.
Ben-zvi-Assaraf, O. and Orion, N., 2010a, System thinking skills at the elementary school level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 540-563.

4.
Ben-zvi-Assaraf, O. and Orion, N., 2010b, Four case studies, six years later: developing system thinking skills in junior high school and sustaining them over time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 1253-1280. crossref(new window)

5.
Brosnan, T., 1990, Categorizing macro and micro explanations of material change (eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles. CD-$\beta$ Press, Utrecht, Holland, pp. 198-211.

6.
Cho, S. and Kim, M., 2011, An analysis of brain dominance, cognitive characteristics, and emotion between scientifically gifted students and general students. Journal of the Korean Society for Biology Education, 39, 345-354. (in Korean)

7.
Cho, S. and Paik, S., 2006, A comparison analysis of intellectual characteristics between science-gifted education students and general students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26, 307-316. (in Korean)

8.
Chun, B., Park, K., and Chun, M., 2008, An analysis of the attitude toward science, achievements motivation, and the peer relationship, and parents' attitudes to science gifted education. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 18, 443-464. (in Korean)

9.
Chung, C. and Kang, K., 2007, The relationships among scientifically gifted students' science related attitudes, learning motivation and learning strategy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27, 848-853. (in Korean)

10.
Department for Education, 2013, The national curriculum in England Framework document (July 2013). Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.uk/

11.
Driver, R., Guesne, E., and Tiberghien, A., 1985, Some features of children's ideas and their implications for teaching. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (eds.), Children's ideas in science. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK, pp. 193-201.

12.
Forrester, J.W., 1992, System dynamics and learner centered learning in kindergarten through 12th grade education. Boston, MA: Cambridge.

13.
Garigliano, L., 1975, SCIS: Children's understanding of the systems concept. School Science and Mathematics, 75, 245-249. crossref(new window)

14.
Glynn, S.M., Gita, T., and Brickman, P., 2009, Science motivation Questionnaire: Construct Validation With Nonscience Majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 127-146. crossref(new window)

15.
Go, Y. and Yeo, S., 2011, Comparison of problem finding ability, creative thinking ability, creative tendency, science process skill between the scientifically gifted and general students. Journal of the Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 30, 624-633. (in Korean)

16.
Heo, J. and Lee, Y., 2008, The Relationship between the creativity and motivation of scientifically gifted students. Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted, 18, 343-363. (in Korean)

17.
Hill, D. and Redden, M., 1985, An investigation of the system concept. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 233-239. crossref(new window)

18.
Hlawatsh, S., Bayrhuber, H., Euler, M., Hansen, K.H., Hildebrandt, K., Hoffmann, L., Lucius, E.R., Siemer, F., and Hassenpflug, W., 2003, Earth Systems Education in Germany. In Mayer, V.J. (ed), Implementing global science literacy. Earth Systems Education Program, The Ohio State University, OH, USA, 155-156.

19.
Jax, D.W., 1995, A case study of the initiation and implementation of an innovative integrated science curriculum for grades nine and ten. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio States University, OH, USA, 340 p.

20.
Jeon, J., 2014, The development and application of STEAM education program based on systems thinking for the high school students. Unpublished M.E. thesis, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, 169 p.

21.
Kali, Y., Orion, N., and Eylon, B-S., 2003, Effect of knowledge integration activities on students' perception of the Earth's crust as a cyclic system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 545-556. crossref(new window)

22.
Karplus, R. and Thier, H., 1969, A new look at elementary school science; science curriculum improvement study. Rand McNally, Chicago, USA, 204 p.

23.
Kim, D., 1999, Introduction to systems thinking. Boston, MA: Pegasus Communication.

24.
Kim, D., 2004, Systems thinking. Sunhaksa, Seoul, Korea, 323 p.

25.
Kim, D., 2005, Introspecsive reflection on applying systems thinking: Toward an incremental systems thinking. Journal of Institute of Governmental Studies, 11, 63-85. (in Korean)

26.
Kim, M. and Kim, B., 2002, A comparative study of the trends of current science education and the system thinking paradigm. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22, 64-75. (in Korean)

27.
Kim, S., 2010, Systems thinking and scenario planning. CBNU Press, Cheongju, Korea, 404 p.

28.
Kim, S., & Yoo, M., 2012, Comparison on the vocational values and the science career orientation between middle school scientifically gifted students and nongifted students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32, 1222-1240. (in Korean) crossref(new window)

29.
Kim, Y. and Jeong, J., 2009, Understandings on the cycle as a substance and ESE. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29, 951-962. (in Korean)

30.
Kim, Y., Jeong, J., and Wee, S., 2009, Analysis of conceptions of earth system cycles as perceived by college students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29, 963-977. (in Korean)

31.
Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity [KoFAC], 2012a, STEAM education program(elementary). Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.

32.
Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity [KoFAC], 2012b, Introduce of STEAM education. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.

33.
Kwon, Y., Kim, W., Lee, H., Byun, J., and Lee, I., 2011, Analysis of biology teachers' systems thinking about ecosystem. Journal of the Korean Society for Biology Education, 39, 529-543. (in Korean)

34.
Lee, D., Oh, E., Kim, H., and Jeong, J., 2013, Analysis of carbon cycle concepts based on earth systems perspective of high school students. Journal of Science Education, 37, 157-169. (in Korean)

35.
Lee, H., 2003, A comparison of Korean and American secondary school students' understanding about Earth systems contents and environment topics. In mayer V.J. (Ed), Implementing global science literacy. Columbus, OH, USA: Earth Systems Education Program, The Ohio State University, 81-91.

36.
Lee, H. and Kim, S., 2009, The recognition characteristics of science gifted students on the earth system based on their thinking style. Journal of Science Education, 33, 12-30. (in Korean)

37.
Lee, H., 2010, A qualitative case study of an exemplary science teacher's Earth Systems Education experiences. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 31, 500-520. (in Korean) crossref(new window)

38.
Lee, H., 2011, Middle school students' understanding about Earth systems to implement the 2009 revised national science curriculum effectively. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 32, 798-808. (in Korean) crossref(new window)

39.
Lee, H., Kwon, Y., Oh, H., and Lee, H., 2011, Development and application of the educational program to increase high school students' systems thinking skills: Focus on global warming. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 32, 784-797. (in Korean) crossref(new window)

40.
Lee, H., Kwon, H., Park, K., and Lee, H., 2013, An instrument development and validation for measuring high school students' systems thinking. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33, 995-1006. (in Korean) crossref(new window)

41.
Lee, H. and Lee, H., 2013, Revalidation of measuring instrument systems thinking and comparison of systems thinking between science and general high school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33, 1237-1247. (in Korean) crossref(new window)

42.
Mayer, V.J., 1995, Using the Earth systems for integrating the science curriculum. Science Education, 79, 375-391. crossref(new window)

43.
Mayer, V.J., 2002, Global Science literacy (Ed.), Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, Netherland, 242 p.

44.
Mayer, V.J., 2003, Implementing global science literacy (Ed.), Earth Systems Education Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, 293 p.

45.
Meadows. D.H., 2008, Thinking in systems. Chelsea green, Washington, DC, USA, 240 p.

46.
Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology, 2011, Science curriculum [no. 9]. Seoul: Ministry of education and science technology.

47.
Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development, 2000, High school curriculum explain: science. Seoul: Ministry of education & human resources development.

48.
Moon, B., Jeong, J., Kyung, J., Koh, Y., Youn, S., Kim, H., and Oh, K., 2004, Related conception s to earth system and applying of systems thinking about carbon cycle of the preservice teachers. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 25, 684-696. (in Korean)

49.
Moon, B. and Kim, H., 2007, A study on the abilities and characteristics of the systems thinking for pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Korean System Dynamics Society, 8, 235-252. (in Korean)

50.
Moon, T., 2011, Discriminant analysis of the gifted children in science, mathematics, and information technology using self-determination motivation and selfefficacy. Journal of Korean Association of Child Studies, 20, 33-44. (in Korean)

51.
Na, D. and Kim, J., 2004, The structural difference between science-gifted students and ordinary students in the triarchic intelligence, thinking styles, and academic performance. Journal of Journal of Korea Educational Psychology Association, 18, 115-130. (in Korean)

52.
National Research Council [NRC], 1996, National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 272 p.

53.
National Research Council [NRC], 2012, A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 400 p.

54.
National Research Council [NRC], 2013, Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 534 p.

55.
O'Connor, J. and McDermmot, I., 1997, The art of systems thinking: Essential skills for creativity and problem solving. Thorsons Publishers, London, UK, 288 p.

56.
Ontario Ministry of Education, 2011, Ontario schools kindergarten to grade 12 policy and program requirements. Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Education.

57.
Oh, H.S. and Kim, C.J., 2010, An analysis of Earth system understandings (ESU) of 8th-grade students' imagery about 'the Earth' represented by words and drawings. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 31, 71-87. (in Korean) crossref(new window)

58.
Park, B., Koh, M., and Kim, O., 2012, The comparison of the science gifted and mathematics gifted in attitude toward science and learning motivations in science of elementary school students. Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted, 22, 917-928. (in Korean)

59.
Park, S., 2004, Analysis on the earth science concepts of the gifted science students and non-gifted students by the type of thinking styles. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 25, 708-718. (in Korean)

60.
Park, S. and Kim, K., 2005, Analysis on the relationship between gifted science students' thinking style types and academic achievement and science concepts. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25, 307-320. (in Korean)

61.
Park, B., 2014, Development and Implementation of System Thinking-based STEAM Education Program. Unpublished M.E. thesis, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, 178 p.

62.
Park, B. and Lee, H., 2014, Development and application of systems thinking-based STEAM Education Program to improve secondary science gifted and talented students' systems thinking skill. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24, 421-444. (in Korean)

63.
Renzulli, J.S., 1978, What make giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184.

64.
Renzulli, J.S., Reis, S.M., and Smith, L.H., 1981, The revolving door Identification model. Creative Learning Press, Mansfield, CT, USA, 248 p.

65.
Seong, T., 2011, Statistical package for the social science. Haksisa, Seoul, Korea, 542 p.

66.
Song, J., 2011, SPSS/AMOS Statistical analysis. 21 Century Press, Paju, Korea, 480 p.

67.
Shin, D.H., 2000, Past, present and future of earth science education research in Korea. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 21, 479-487. (in Korean)

68.
Shin, D.H., 2001, Earth science in the perspective of environmental education. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 22, 147-158. (in Korean)

69.
Shin, Y. and Sohn, W., 2012, A person-centered analysis of achievement goal orientations for gifted and non-gifted 7th graders. Journal of Korea School Psychology Association, 9, 65-83. (in Korean) crossref(new window)

70.
Shim, J. and Kim, O., 2003, A study on characteristic of the gifted in science based on implicit theory. Journal of Korea Educational Psychology Association, 17, 241-255. (in Korean)

71.
Shim, J., Kim, J., and Kim, O., 2005, A comparative study of creativity between gifted students in science and ordinary students. Journal of Korea Educational Psychology Association, 19, 563-576. (in Korean)