JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Importance of Reaction Mechanisms in Interpreting the Arsenic Reactive Transport of FeS-coated Sand Column
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Importance of Reaction Mechanisms in Interpreting the Arsenic Reactive Transport of FeS-coated Sand Column
Han, Young-Soo; Demond, Avery H.; Hayes, Kim F.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
FeS, as a natural reduced iron mineral, has been recognized to be a viable reactive material for As(III) sequestration in natural and engineered systems. In this study, FeS-coated sand packed columns were tested to evaluate the As(III) removal capacities under anaerobic conditions at pH 5, 7 and 9. The column obtained As(III) removal capacity was then compared with the capacity result obtained from batch reactors. In the comparison, two different approaches were used. The first approach was used the total As(III) removal capacity which method was proved to be useful for interpreting pH 5 system. The second approach was used to consider sorption non-linearity and proved to be useful for interpreting the pH 9. The results demonstrated that a mechanistic understanding of the different removal processes at different pH conditions is important to interpret the column experimental results. At pH 5, where the precipitation of arsenic sulfide plays the major role in the removal of arsenic, the column shows a greater removal efficiency than the batch system due to the continuous dissolution of sulfide and precipitation of arsenic sulfide. At pH 9, where adsorption mainly governs the arsenic removal, the sorption nonlinearity should be considered in the estimation of the column capacity. This study highlighted the importance of understanding reaction mechanism to predict column performance using batch-obtained experimental results.
 Keywords
FeS-coated sand;reactive transport;precipitation/adsorption mechanism;column and batch comparison;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Appelo, C.A.J. and Postma, D., 2005, Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution. A.A. Balkema Publishers.

2.
Barnett, M.O., Jardine, P.M., Brooks, S.C., and Selim, H.M., 2000, Adsorption and transport of uranium(VI) in subsurface media, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 64, 908-917. crossref(new window)

3.
Bostick, B.C., Fendorf, S., and Manning, B.A., 2003, Arsenite adsorption on galena (PbS) and sphalerite (ZnS), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 67, 895-907. crossref(new window)

4.
Darland, J.E. and Inskeep, W.P., 1997, Effects of pore water velocity on the transport of arsenate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 704-709. crossref(new window)

5.
Gabriel, U., Gaudet, J.P., Spadini, L., and Charlet, L., 1998, Reactive transport of uranyl in a goethite column: an experimental and modelling study, Chem. Geol., 151, 107-128. crossref(new window)

6.
Gallegos, T.J., Hyun, S.P., and Hayes, K.F., 2007, Spectroscopic investigation of the uptake of arsenite from solution by synthetic mackinawite, Environmental Science & Technology, 41, 7781-7786. crossref(new window)

7.
Han, Y.S., Gallegos, T.J., Demond, A.H., and Hayes, K.F., 2011a, FeS-coated sand for removal of arsenic(III) under anaerobic conditions in permeable reactive barriers, Water Res., 45, 593-604. crossref(new window)

8.
Han, Y.S., Jeong, H.Y., Demond, A.H., and Hayes, K.F., 2011b, X-ray absorption and photoelectron spectroscopic study of the association of As(III) with nanoparticulate FeS and FeS-coated sand, Water Res., 45, 5727-5735. crossref(new window)

9.
He, F., Zhang, M., Qian, T.W., and Zhao, D.Y., 2009, Transport of carboxymethyl cellulose stabilized iron nanoparticles in porous media: Column experiments and modeling, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 334, 96-102. crossref(new window)

10.
Jia, Y., Breedveld, G.D., and Aagaard, P., 2007, Column studies on transport of deicing additive benzotriazole in a sandy aquifer and a zerovalent iron barrier, Chemosphere, 69, 1409-1418. crossref(new window)

11.
Kim, S.B., Ha, H.C., Choi, N.C., and Kim, D.J., 2006, Influence of flow rate and organic carbon content on benzene transport in a sandy soil, Hydrol. Process., 20, 4307-4316. crossref(new window)

12.
Leij, F.J. and Dane, J.H., 1991, Solute transport in a 2-layer medium investigated with time moments, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 55, 1529-1535. crossref(new window)

13.
Limousin, G., Gaudet, J.P., Charlet, L., Szenknect, S., Barthes, V., and Krimissa, M., 2007, Sorption isotherms: A review on physical bases, modeling and measurement, Appl. Geochem., 22, 249-275. crossref(new window)

14.
Seo, D.C., Yu, K., and DeLaune, R.D., 2008, Comparison of monometal and multimetal adsorption in Mississippi River alluvial wetland sediment: Batch and column experiments, Chemosphere, 73, 1757-1764. crossref(new window)

15.
Toride, N., Leij, F.J., and van Genuchten, M.T., 1995, The CXT-FIT code for estimating transport parameters from laboratory or field tracer experiments, Version 2.0. . U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Riverside, CA, p. 121 p.

16.
Wibulswas, R., 2004, Batch and fixed bed sorption of methylene blue on precursor and QACs modified montmorillonite, Sep. Purif. Technol., 39, 3-12. crossref(new window)