JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Removal of RDX using Lab-scale Plug Flow Constructed Wetlands Planted with Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Maxim.) Benth
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Removal of RDX using Lab-scale Plug Flow Constructed Wetlands Planted with Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Maxim.) Benth
Lee, Ahreum; Kim, Bumjoon; Park, Jieun; Bae, Bumhan;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
RDX (hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine) is the most important explosive contaminant, both in concentration and in frequency, at military shooting ranges in which green technologies such as phytoremediation or constructed wetlands are the best option for mitigation of explosive compounds discharge to the environment. A study was conducted with two identical lab-scale plug flow constructed wetlands planted with Amur silver grass to treat water artificially contaminated with 40 mg/L of toxic explosive compound, RDX. The reactor was inoculated with or without RDX degrading mixed culture to evaluate plant-microorganism interactions in RDX removal, transformation products distribution, and kinetic constants. RDX and its metabolites in water, plant, and sediment were analyzed by HPLC to determine mass balance and kinetic constants. After 30 days of operation, the reactor reached steady-state at which more than 99% of RDX was removed with or without the mixed culture inoculation. The major transformation product was TNX (Trinitroso-RDX) that comprised approximately 50% in the mass balance of both reactors. It was also the major compound in the plant root and shoot system. Acute toxicity analysis of the water samples showed more than 30% of toxicity reduction in the effluent than that of influent containing 40 mg/L of RDX. In the Amur silver grass mesocosm seeded with the mixed culture, the specific RDX removal rate, that is 1st order removal rate normalized to plant fresh weight, was estimated to be 0.84 kg−1 day−1 which is 16.7% higher than that in the planted only mesocosm. Therefore, the results of this study proved that Amur silver grass is an effective plant for RDX removal in constructed wetlands and the efficiency can be increased even more when applied with RDX degrading microbial consortia.
 Keywords
Constructed wetlands;Kinetics;Plug flow reactor;Phytoremediation;RDX;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Armstrong, J. and Armstrong, W., 1990, Pathways and mechanisms of oxygen transport in Phragmites australis. In: Cooper P.F. and Findlater, B.C. Eds., Constructed Wetlands in Water Pollution Control, Advances in Water Pollution Control, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 529-534.

2.
Bae, B. and Park, J., 2014, Distribution and migration characteristics of explosive compounds in soil at military shooting ranges in Gyeonggi province, J. Kor. Geo-Environ. Soc., 15(6), 17-29.

3.
Funk, S.B., Roberts, D.J., Crawford, D.L., and Crawford, R.L., 1993, Initial-phase optimization for bioremediation of munition compound-contaminated soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59, 2171-2177.

4.
Groom, C.A., Halasz, A., Paquet, L., Morris, N., Olivier, L., Dubois, C., and Hawari, J., 2002, Accumulation of HMX (Octahydro-1,3,5,7- tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine) in indigenous and agricultural plants grown in HMX-contaminated anti-tank firing-range soil, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 112-118. crossref(new window)

5.
Haberl, R., Grego, S., Langergraber, G., Kadlec, R.H., Cicalini, A.-R., Dias, S.M., Novais, J.M., Aubert, S., Gerth, A., Thomas, H., and Hebner, A., 2003, Constructed wetlands for the treatment of organic pollutants, J. Soil. Sediment., 3, 109-124. crossref(new window)

6.
Khan, M.I., Yang, H., Yoo, B., and Par, J., 2015, Improved RDX detoxification with starch addition using a novel nitrogen-fixing aerobic microbial consortium from soil contaminated with explosives, J. Hazard. Mater., 287, 243-251. crossref(new window)

7.
Low, D., Tan, K., Anderson, T., Cobb, G.P., Liu, J., and Jackson, W.A., 2008, Treatment of RDX using down-flow constructed wetland mesocosms, Ecol. Eng., 32, 72-80. crossref(new window)

8.
Park, S.H., Bae, B.H., Kim, M.K., and Chang, Y.Y., 2008, Distribution and behavior of mixed contaminants, explosives and heavy metals, at a small scale military shooting range, J. Kor. Soc. Water Qual., 24(5), 523-532.

9.
Park, J. and Bae, B., 2014, Uptake and transformation of RDX by perennial plants in Poaceae family (amur silver grass and reed canary grass) under hydroponic culture conditions, J. Kor. Soc. Environ. Eng., 36(4), 237-245.

10.
Preuβ, J. and Haas, R., 1987, Die Standorte der Pulver-, Sprengstoff-, Kampfund Nebelerzeugung im ehemaligen deutschen Reich, Geogr. Rundschau., 39, 378-584.

11.
Sikora, F.J., Behrends, L.L., Phillips, W.D., Coonrod, H.S., Bailey, E., and Bader, D.F., 1997, A microcosm study on remediation of explosives-contaminated groundwater using constructed wetlands, Ann N Y Acad Sci., 829, 202-218. crossref(new window)

12.
USEPA, 2000, Introduction to Phytoremediation, Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/R-99/017.

13.
USEPA, 2012, 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories, Office of Water, EPA 822-S-12-001.

14.
Zhang, B., Kendall, R.J., and Anderson, T.A., 2006, Toxicity of the explosive metabolites hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitroso-1,3,5-triazine(TNX) and hexahydro-1-nitroso-3,5-dinitro-1,3,5-triazine (MNX) to the earthworm Eisenia fetida, Chemosphere, 64(1), 86-95. crossref(new window)