JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Strength Development and Carbonation Characteristics of Slag Cement/Class C Fly Ash blended CO2 Injection Well Sealant
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Strength Development and Carbonation Characteristics of Slag Cement/Class C Fly Ash blended CO2 Injection Well Sealant
Kim, Tae Yoo; Hwang, Kyung-Yup; Hwang, Inseong;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
CO2 injection well sealant is vulnerable to supercritical CO2 (scCO2) exposure. To develop an alternative to the conventional sealant system (class G cement/class F fly ash), the performance of slag cement (SPC) systems containing class F fly ash (FFA) or class C fly ash (CFA) was evaluated and compared with the conventional sealant under scCO2 conditions. All sealant systems showed an immediate increase in compressive strength upon scCO2 exposure and, at 37.6 MPa, SPC/CFA showed the highest compressive strength after 14 days, which was much higher than the 29.8 MPa of the conventional sealant system. Substantial decreases in porosity were observed in all sealant systems, which were partly responsible for the increase in strength. Carbonation reactions led to pH decreases in the tested sealants from 12.5 to 10~11.6. In particular, the greatest decrease in pH in slag cement/class C fly ash probably supported relatively sustainable alkali activation reactions and the integrity of cement hydrates in this system. XRD revealed the presence of CaCO3 and a decrease in the content of cement hydrates in the tested sealants upon scCO2 exposure. TGA demonstrated a greater increase of CaCO3 and calcium-silicate-hydrate phases in SPC/CFA than in the conventional sealant upon scCO2 exposure.
 Keywords
CO2 storage;Oil well cement;Slag cement;Fly ash;Carbonation;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Barlet-Gouédard, V., Ayache, B., and Rimmelé, G., 2008, Cementitious Material Behaviour under CO2 environment. A laboratory comparison, Proceedings of the 4th Meeting of the Well Bore Integrity Network, Paris, France, p. 18-19.

2.
Carey, J.W., Wigand, M., Chipera, S.J., WoldeGabriel, G., Pawar, R., Lichtner, P.C., Wehner, S.C., Raines, M.a., and Guthrie, G.D., 2007, Analysis and performance of oil well cement with 30 years of CO2 exposure from the SACROC Unit, West Texas, USA, Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con., 1(1), 75-85. crossref(new window)

3.
Celia, M.A., Bachu, S., Nordbotten, J.M., Gasda, S.E., and Dahle, H.K., 2004, Quantitative estimation of CO2 leakage from geological storage: Analytical models, numerical models and data needs, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies(GHGT-7), p. 663-672.

4.
Fabbri, A., Corvisier, J., Schubnel, A., Brunet, F., Goffé, B., Rimmele, G., and Barlet-Gouédard, V., 2009, Effect of carbonation on the hydro-mechanical properties of Portland cements, Cement. Concrete. Res., 39(12), 1156-1163. crossref(new window)

5.
Gasda, S.E., Bachu, S., and Celia, M.A., 2004, Spatial characterization of the location of potentially leaky wells penetrating a deep saline aquifer in a mature sedimentary basin, Environ. Geol., 46(6-7), 707-720. crossref(new window)

6.
Gaurina-Medjimurec, N. and Pasic, B., 2013, CO2 Underground Storage and Wellbore Integrity, Risk Analysis for Prevention of Hazardous Situations in Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Engineering Science Reference, Hershey, PA, USA, 322 p.

7.
Kutchko, B.G., Strazisar, B.R., Dzombak, D.A., Lowry, G.V., and Thaulow, N., 2007, Degradation of well cement by CO2 under geologic sequestration conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41(13), 4787-4792. crossref(new window)

8.
Kutchko, B.G., Strazisar, B.R., Lowry, G.V., Dzombak, D.A., and Thaulow, N., 2008, Rate of CO2 attack on hydrated Class H well cement under geologic sequestration conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(16), 6237-6242. crossref(new window)

9.
Kutchko, B.G., Strazisar, B.R., Huerta, N., Lowry, G.V., Dzombak, D.A., and Thaulow, N., 2009, CO2 reaction with hydrated class H well cement under geologic sequestration conditions: effects of flyash admixtures, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(10), 3947-3952. crossref(new window)

10.
Liteanu, E. and Spiers, C.J., 2011, Fracture healing and transport properties of wellbore cement in the presence of supercritical CO2, Chem. Geol., 281(3), 195-210. crossref(new window)

11.
Litvan, G.G. and Meyer, A., 1986, Carbonation of granulated blast furnace slag cement concrete during twenty years of field exposure, Proceedings of Second International Conference, Madrid, Spain, 91(2), p1445-1462.

12.
Onan, D.D., 1984, Effects of supercritical carbon dioxide on well cements, Proceedings of Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, p161.

13.
Rimmelé, G., Barlet-Gouédard, V., Porcherie, O., Goffé, B., and Brunet, F., 2008, Heterogeneous porosity distribution in Portland cement exposed to CO2-rich fluids, Cement. Concrete. Res., 38(8), 1038-1048. crossref(new window)

14.
Thomas, M.D.A., 2007, Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash in Concrete (Vol. 5420), Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, USA, 24 p.

15.
Villain, G., Thiery, M., and Platret, G., 2007, Measurement methods of carbonation profiles in concrete: thermogravimetry, chemical analysis and gammadensimetry, Cement. Concrete. Res., 37(8), 1182-1192. crossref(new window)