JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Characteristics of Auditory Stereocilia in the Apical Turn of the Echolocating Bats by Scanning Electron Microscopy
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Applied Microscopy
  • Volume 44, Issue 1,  2014, pp.8-14
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Electron Microscopy
  • DOI : 10.9729/AM.2014.44.1.8
 Title & Authors
Characteristics of Auditory Stereocilia in the Apical Turn of the Echolocating Bats by Scanning Electron Microscopy
Kim, Jinyong; Jung, Yongwook;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The auditory system of the Korean greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum korai, RFK) is adapted to its own echolocation signal, which consist of constant frequency (CF) element and frequency modulated (FM) element. In contrast, the Japanese long-fingered bat (Miniopterus schreibersii fuliginosus, MSF) emits FM signals. In the present study, the characteristics of stereocilia in RFK (a CF/FM bat) and MSF (a FM bat) were studied in the apical turn of the cochlea where the lower frequencies are transduced. Stereocilia lengths and numbers were quantitatively measured in RFK by scanning electron microscopy and compared with those of MSF. Each inner hair cells (IHCs) of RFK possessed three rows of stereocilia, whereas MSF possessed five rows of stereocilia. Gradients in stereocilia lengths and numbers of stereocilia of the IHCs of RFK were found to be less pronounced and fewer, respectively, than those of MSF. Each outer hair cells (OHCs) possessed three rows of stereocilia in both species. OHCs stereocilia in RFK that distinguished it from MSF were a shorter length and a greater number of stereocilia. These features suggest that the apical cochleas of RFK are adapted for the processing of higher frequency echolocation calls rather than that of MSF.
 Keywords
Echolocating bats;Scanning electron microscopy;Stereocilia;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Ashmore J F (1987) A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. J. Physiol. 388, 323-347. crossref(new window)

2.
Bekesy A G (1960) Experiments in Hearing (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, Toronto, London).

3.
Brownell W E, Bader C R, and Brand D (1985) Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear hair cells. Science 227, 194-196. crossref(new window)

4.
Bruns V and Schmieszek E (1980) Cochlear innervation in the greater horseshoe bat: demonstration of an acoustic fovea. Hearing Res. 3, 27-43. crossref(new window)

5.
Chung C U, Han S H, and Kim S C (2010) General patterns in echolocation call of greater horseshoe bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, Japanese Pipistrelle abramus and large-footed bat Myotis macrodactylus in Korea. J. Enivronmental. Science 19, 61-68. crossref(new window)

6.
Csorba G P, Ujhelyi P, and Thomas N (2003) Horseshoe Bats of the World (Alana Books, Shropshire, England).

7.
Dallos P, Wu X, and Cheatham M A (2008) Prestin-based outer hair cell motility is necessary for mammalian cochlear amplification. Neuron 227, 333-339.

8.
Frishkopf L S and DeRosier D J (1983) Mechanical tuning of free-standing stereociliary bundles and frequency analysis in the alligator lizard cochlea. Hear Res. 12, 393-404. crossref(new window)

9.
Hudspeth A J (1985) The cellular basis of hearing: the biophysics of hair cells. Science 230, 745-752. crossref(new window)

10.
Hudspeth A J and Corey D P (1977) Sensitivity, polarity and conductance change in the response of vertebrate hair cells to controlled mechanical stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 2407-2411. crossref(new window)

11.
Jones G and Teeling E C (2006) The evolution of echolocation in bats. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 21, 49-56.

12.
Lenoir M, Puel J L, and Pujol R (1987) Stereocilia and tectorial membrane development in the rat cochlea. A SEM study. Anat. Embryol. 175, 477-487. crossref(new window)

13.
Liang H K, Li W, and Biao Z L (2011) Dietary composition, echolocation pulses and morphological measurements of the long-fingered bat Miniopterus fuliginosus (Chiroptera: Vespertilinoninae). Zoological. Research 32, 163-167.

14.
Lim D J (1986) Functional structure of the organ of Corti: a review. Hear Res. 22, 117-146. crossref(new window)

15.
Neuweiler G (2003) Evolutionary aspects of bat echolocation. Comp. Physiol. A. Neuroethol. Sens. Neural. Behav. Physiol. 189, 245-256.

16.
Osborne M P, Comis S D, and Pickles J O (1984) Morphology and crosslinkage of stereocilia in the guinea-pig labyrinth examined without the use of osmium as a fixative. Cell Tissue Res. 237, 43-48.

17.
Pollak G D, Marsh D S, and Bodenhamer R (1978) A single unit analysis of inferior colliculus in unanestheized bats: response patterns and spike count functions generated by constant frequency and frequency modulated sounds. J. Neurophysiol. 41, 677-691. crossref(new window)

18.
Pujol R and Lenoir M (1986) The four types of synapses in the organ of Corti. In: Neurobiology of Hearing: The Cochlea, eds. Altschuler R A, Bobbin R P, and Hoffman D W, pp. 161-173, (Raven Press, New York).

19.
Simmons J A and Stein R (1980) Acoustic imaging in bat sonar: echo location signals and the evolution of echolocation. J. Comp. Neurol. 135, 61-84.

20.
Steel K P (1983) The tectorial membrane of mammals. Hear Res. 9, 327-359. crossref(new window)

21.
Strelioff D and Flock A (1984) Graded and nonlinear mechanical properties of sensory hairs in the mammalian hearing organ. Nature 310, 597-599. crossref(new window)

22.
Strelioff D, Flock A, and Minser K E (1985) Role of inner and outer hair cells in mechanical frequency selectivity of the cochlea. Hear Res. 18, 169-175. crossref(new window)

23.
Suga N, Simmons J A, and Jen P H S (2003) Peripheral specialization for fine analysis of Doppler-shifted echoes in the auditory system of the CF-FM bat Pteronotus parnellii. J. Exp. Biol. 90, 2261-2273.

24.
Tilney L G and Saunders J C (1983) Actin filaments, stereocilia, and hair cells of the bird cochlea. I. Length, number, width, and distribution of stereocilia of each hair cell are related to the position of the hair cell on the cochlea. J. Cell Biol. 96, 807-821 crossref(new window)

25.
Vater M and Lenoir M (1992) Ultrastructure of the horseshoe bat's organ of Corti. I. Scanning electron microscopy. J. Comp. Neurol. 318, 367-379. crossref(new window)

26.
Vater M and Siefer W (1995) The cochlea of Tadarida brasiliensis: specialized functional organization in a generalized bat. Hear Res. 91, 178-195. crossref(new window)

27.
Wright A (1984) Dimensions of the cochlear stereocilia in man and the guinea pig. Hear Res. 13, 89-98. crossref(new window)

28.
Yao Q, Zheng Y, Latham J, and Zhang S (2007) Characteristics of echolocating bats' auditory stereocilia length, compared with other mammals. Sci. China C. Life Sci. 50, 492-496. crossref(new window)

29.
Zenner H P (1986) Motile responses in outer hair cells. Hear Res. 22, 83-90. crossref(new window)