JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
What Is Research Misconducts? Publication Ethics Is as Important as Research Integrity
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Applied Microscopy
  • Volume 46, Issue 2,  2016, pp.67-70
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Electron Microscopy
  • DOI : 10.9729/AM.2016.46.2.67
 Title & Authors
What Is Research Misconducts? Publication Ethics Is as Important as Research Integrity
Uhm, Chang-Sub;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Research ethics are mainly of two fields; research integrity and publication ethics. Research misconducts can occur at both areas. Examples of the research integrity violations are falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism; and those of the publication ethics violations are duplicate publication including self-plagiarism, and improper authorship. In this paper, concepts of research misconducts defined in Research Misconduct-related Rules of The Korean Society of Microscopy are explained and discussed.
 Keywords
Research integrity;Research misconduct;Duplicate publication;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Bailey B J (2002) Duplicate publication in the fi eld of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 126, 211-216. crossref(new window)

2.
Blancett S S, Flanagin A, and Young R K (1995) Duplicate publication in the nursing literature. Image J. Nurs. Sch. 27, 51-56. crossref(new window)

3.
Errami M and Garner H (2008) A tale of two citations. Nature 451, 397-399. crossref(new window)

4.
Errami M, Hicks J M, Fisher W, Trusty D, Wren J D, Long T C, and Garner H R (2008) Deja vu-a study of duplicate citations in Medline. Bioinformatics 24, 243-249. crossref(new window)

5.
Gottweis H and Triendl R (2006) South Korean policy failure and the Hwang debacle. Nature Biotech. 24, 141-143. crossref(new window)

6.
Hughes C A (2006) A view from an academic librarian. In: Charleston Conference Proceedings 2004, eds. Bazirjian R, Speck V H, and Bernhardt B R, pp. 113-122, (Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara).

7.
Kim H S (2010) Interdisciplinary relation to establish research ethics. In: The Theme and Prospect of Research Ethics. The 1st 2010 Research Ethics Forum, pp. 13-30, (The Korean Association of Academic Societies, Seoul).

8.
Kim S Y (2015) The status of duplicate publication in medical fields. In: Research Ethics: Practical issues and policies II. The 2nd 2015 Research Ethics Forum, pp. 7-36, (The Korean Association of Academic Societies, Seoul).

9.
Kim S Y, Hahm C K, Bae C W, and Cho H M (2008) Duplicate publications in Korean Medical Journals Indexed in KoreaMed. J. Korean Med. Sci. 23, 131-133. crossref(new window)

10.
Lariviere V and Gingras Y (2010) On the prevalence and scientifi c impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980-2007). J. Documentation 66, 179-190. crossref(new window)

11.
Rosenthal E L, Masdon J L, Buckman C, and Hawn M (2003) Duplicate publications in the otolaryngology literature. Laryngoscope 113, 772-774. crossref(new window)

12.
Royal Society and The British Library and Association of Professional and Learned Society Publishers (BLAPLSP) (1993) The Scientific, Technical and Medical Information System in the UK, British Library R&D Report 6123, (Royal Society, London).

13.
Sorokina D, Gehrke J, Warner S, and Ginsparg P (2006) Plagiarism detection in arXiv. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'06), pp. 1070-1075, (IEEE, Hong Kong).

14.
Steneck N H (2007) ORI (The Offi ce of Research Integrity) Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research. Revised ed. (Department of Health & Human Services, Bethesda).

15.
The Korean Society of Microscopy (2012) Research Misconduct-related Rules [Internet]. Available form: http://ksem.com/page_mORE17.