Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Genetic Distance and Heterosis Degree Among the Developed Waxy Corn Lines
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Volume 60, Issue 4,  2015, pp.464-469
  • Publisher : The Korean Society of Crop Science
  • DOI : 10.7740/kjcs.2015.60.4.464
 Title & Authors
Genetic Distance and Heterosis Degree Among the Developed Waxy Corn Lines
Lee, Moon-Sub; Yang, Jae-Hyeon; Lim, Seung-Bin; Lee, Hee-Bong;
  PDF(new window)
This study was carried out to find relationships of genetic distance and heterosis expression degree in the developed CNU waxy corn lines. The used material were developed in Corn Breeding Laboratory, Coll. of Agri. & Life Sci., CNU. Total 10 primers used for SSR maker analysis. In genetic distance, the used lines divided into four groups; A group has two lines, B group has one line, C group has ten lines and D group has eleven lines, respectively. Among used lines, CNU427 and CNU588 were very closed as a 74, while CNU451 and CNU429 were remote as a 40 inbred coefficient, respectively. While heterosis degree were very variable not only hybrids but also cross parents. Average heterosis of most cross-parent was high in plant height, ear height, flowering day and ear length. Especially, CNU H09-23 hybrid was high as 79.4% than other hybrids. Here, we gained the fact has closely relationship between genetic distance and heterosis.
heterosis;reciprocal crossing;waxy corn;cross parent;
 Cited by
Cho, D. H. 2001. Photosynthetic Performance of Transgenic Rice Plants Overexpressing Maize $C_4$ Photosynthesis Enzymes. Korean J.Crop Sci. 2001(1) : 30-38.

Choi, K. J., S. E. Park, M. S. Chin, H. S. Lee, and K. Y. Park. 1994. Heterosis and Heritability of Stay-Green Characters in Maize. Korean J. Breed. 26(1) : 53-60.

Diers, B. W., P. B. E. McVetty, and T. C. Osborn. 1996. Relationship between Heterosis and Genetic Distance Based on Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Markers in Oilseed Rape(Brassica napus L.) Crop Sci. Vol. 36 : 79-83. crossref(new window)

East E. M. Heterosis. 1936. Gen. 21 : 375-397.

Frova, C. P., D. F. N. Krajewski, M. Villa, and M. Sari-Gorla. 1999. Genetic analysis of drought tolerance in maize by markers. I. Yield components. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99 : 280-288. crossref(new window)

Ji, H. C., Y. I. Kim, H. B. Lee, and J. W. Cho. 2007. Genetic Diversity of colored Rice Lines Based on Botanical Characteristics and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers. J.Fac.Agr., Kyushu Univ., 52(2) : 287-293.

Lee, H. B., H. G. Kim, J. Y. Jung, H. G. Choi, D. U. Kim, and J. P. Kim. 2001. Growth and Yield in Waxy Maize Hybrid, "Yeonnong $\times$ Jaerae" Korean J. Breed. 28(2) : 65-69.

Lonnquist, J. H. and C. O. Gardner. 1960. Heterosis on Intervarietal Crosses in Maize and Its Implication in Breeding Procedures. Crop Sci. pp. 179-183.

Maroof, M. A. S., G. P. Yang, and Q. F. Zhang. 1997. Correlation between Molecular Marker Distance and Hybrid Performance in U.S. Southern Long Grain Rice. Crop Science Vol. 37 : 145-150. crossref(new window)

Moll, R. H., W. S. Salhuana, and H. F. Robinson. 1962. Heterosis and Genetic Diversity in Variety Crosses of Maize. Crop Sci. 2 : 197-198. crossref(new window)

Paterniani, E. and J. H. Lonnquist. 1963. Heterosis in Interracial Crosses of Corn. Crop Sci. Vol 3 : 504-507. crossref(new window)

Penny, L. H., W. A. Russell, and G. F. Sprague. 1962. Types of Gene Action in Yield Heterosis in Maize. Crop Sci. Vol 2 : 341-344. crossref(new window)

Robinson, H. F. and C. C. Cockerham. 1961. Heterosis and Inbreeding Depression in Populations Involving Two Open-pollinated Varieties of Maize. Crop Sci. 1 : 68-71. crossref(new window)

Son, B. Y., S. B. Baek, J. T. Kim, J. S. Lee, W. H. Kim, and J. H. Roh. 2014. A New Single Cross Maize Hybrid for silage and Grain 'Cheongdaok' with Lodging Tolerance. Korean J. Breed. Sci. 46(2) : 172-177. crossref(new window)