JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Characteristics of Journal Editorial Boards in Library and Information Science
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Characteristics of Journal Editorial Boards in Library and Information Science
Willett, Peter;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
A study of the members of the editorial boards of 16 leading LIS journals shows that the boards vary markedly in size, in diversity (in terms of both gender and nationality) and in the experience and publication/citation profiles (based on Web of Science data) of their board-members. A typical editorial board member will be male, work in the USA, have published their first LIS article in 1995, and have 9.5 publications and 39 non-self citations to those publications, with the publication/citation profiles differing significantly from those of non-board-member contributors to the 16 journals.
 Keywords
Academic Journal;Editorial Boards;Journal;Library and Information Science;Professional Journal;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Amrein, K., Langmann, A., Fahrleitner-Pammer, A., Pieber, T. R., & Zollner-Schwetz, I. (2011). Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals. Gender Medicine, 8, 378-387. crossref(new window)

2.
Baccini, A., & Barabesi, L. (2010). Interlocking editorship. A network analysis of the links between economic journals. Scientometrics, 82, 365-389. crossref(new window)

3.
Baccini, A., & Barabesi, L. (2011). Seats at the table: The network of the editorial boards in information and library science. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 382-391. crossref(new window)

4.
Barzilai-Nahon, B. (2009). Gatekeeping: a critical review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43, 1-79.

5.
Bedeian, A. G., van Fleet, D. D., & Hyman, H. H. (2009a). “Circle the wagons and defend the faith”: Slicing and dicing the data. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 276-295.

6.
Bedeian, A. G., van Fleet, D. D., & Hyman, H. H. (2009b). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 211-238.

7.
Boldt, J., & Maleck, W. (2000). Composition of the editorial/advisory boards of major English-language anesthesia/critical care journals. Acta Anaesthiologica Scandinavica, 44, 175-179. crossref(new window)

8.
Bonnevie, E. (2003). A multifaceted portrait of a library and information science journal: the case of the Journal of Information Science. Journal of Information Science, 29, 11-23. crossref(new window)

9.
Braun, T., & Diospatonyi, I. (2005). Counting the gatekeepers of international science journals a worthwhile science indicator. Current Science, 89, 1548-1551.

10.
Braun, T., & Diospatonyi, I. (2006). Gatekeeping in the international journal literature of chemistry. Information Processing & Management, 42, 1652-1656. crossref(new window)

11.
Brinn, T., & Jones, M. J. (2007). Editorial boards in accounting: The power and the glory. Accounting Forum, 31, 1-25. crossref(new window)

12.
Burgess, T. F., & Shaw, N. E. (2010). Editorial board membership of management and business journals: A social network analysis study of the Financial Times. British Journal of Management, 21, 627-648. crossref(new window)

13.
Cabanac, G. (2012). Shaping the landscape of research in information systems from the perspective of editorial boards: a scientometric study of 77 leading journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 977-996. crossref(new window)

14.
Calver, M., Wardell-Johnson, G., Bradley, S., & Taplin, R. (2010). What makes a journal international? A case study using conservation biology journals. Scientometrics, 85, 387-400. crossref(new window)

15.
Cronin, B. (2009). A seat at the table. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2387. crossref(new window)

16.
Davarpanah, M. R., & Aslekia, S. (2008). A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics, 77, 21-39. crossref(new window)

17.
Fogarty, T., & Liao, C. (2009). Blessed are the gatekeepers: A longitudinal study of the editorial boards of The Accounting Review. Issues in Accounting Education, 24, 299-318. crossref(new window)

18.
Fong, C. J., Yoo, J. H., Jones, S. J., Torres, L. G., & Decker, M. L. (2009). Trends in female authorships, editorial board memberships, and editorships in educational psychology journals from 2003 to 2008. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 267-277. crossref(new window)

19.
Garcia-Carpintero, E., Granadino, B., & Plaza, L. M. (2010). The representation of nationalities on the editorial boards of international journals and the promotion of the scientific output of the same countries. Scientometrics, 84, 799-811. crossref(new window)

20.
Glogoff, S. (1988). Reviewing the gatekeepers: A survey of referees of library journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39, 400-407. crossref(new window)

21.
Hames, I. (2001). Editorial boards: realizing their potential. Learned Publishing, 14, 247-256. crossref(new window)

22.
Hardin, W. G., Liano, K., Chan, K. C., & Fok, R. C. W. (2008). Finance editorial board membership and research productivity. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 31, 225-240. crossref(new window)

23.
Harzing, A.-W., & Metz, I. (2011). Gender and geographic diversity in the editorial board of the Journal of International Business Studies. AIB Insights, 11(3), 3-7.

24.
Harzing, A.-W., & Metz, I. (2012). Practicing what we preach: The geographic diversity of editorial boards. Management International Review, in press.

25.
Hodgson, G. M., & Rothman, H. (1999). The editors and authors of economics journals: a case of institutional oligopoly? The Economic Journal, 109, F165-F186. crossref(new window)

26.
Humphreys, J. T., & Stauffer, S. L. (2000). An analysis of the editorial committee of the Journal of Research in Music Education, 1953-1992. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 65-77. crossref(new window)

27.
Jagsi, R., Tarbell, N. J., Henault, L. E., Chang, Y.-W., & Hylek, E. M. (2008). The representation of women on the editorial boards of major medical journals: A 35-year perspective. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168, 544-548. crossref(new window)

28.
Jarvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (1990). Content-analysis of research articles in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 21, 395-421.

29.
Kennedy, B. L., Lin, Y., & Dickstein, L. J. (2001). Women on the editorial boards of major journals. Academic Medicine, 76, 849-851. crossref(new window)

30.
Lariviere, V., Sugimoto, C. R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 997-1016. crossref(new window)

31.
Lowe, D. J., & van Fleet, D. D. (2009). Scholarly achievement and accounting journal editorial board membership. Journal of Accounting Education, 27, 197-209. crossref(new window)

32.
Malin, B., & Carley, K. (2007). A longitudinal social network analysis of the editorial boards of medical informatics and bioinformatics journals. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14, 340-348. crossref(new window)

33.
McNamee, S. J., & Willis, C. L. (1994). Stratification in science: A comparison of publication patterns in four disciplines. Science Communication, 15, 396-416. crossref(new window)

34.
Metz, I., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009). Gender diversity in editorial boards of management journals. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 540-577. crossref(new window)

35.
Milojevic, S., Sugimoto, C. R., Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2011). The cognitive structure of library and information science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1933-1953. crossref(new window)

36.
Morton, M. J., & Sonnad, S. S. (2007). Women on professional society and journal editorial boards. Journal of the National Medical Association, 99, 764-771.

37.
Ni, C. & Ding, Y. (2010). Journal clustering through interlocking editorship information. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47, 1-10.

38.
Ni, C. Sugimoto, C. R. & Cronin, B. (2013). Visualizing and comparing four facets of scholarly communication: producers, artifacts, concepts, and gatekeepers. Scientometrics, in press

39.
Nisonger, T. E. (2002). The relationship between international editorial board composition and citation measures in political science, business, and genetics journals. Scientometrics, 54, 257-268. crossref(new window)

40.
Ozbilgin, M. (2004). “International” human resource management. Acadedmic parochialism in editorial boards of the “top” 22 journals on international human resource management. Personnel Review, 33, 205-221. crossref(new window)

41.
Pardeck, J. T. (1992). Are social work journal editorial boards competent? Some disquieting data with implications for research on social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 2, 487-496. crossref(new window)

42.
Parker, L. D. (2007). Developing research journals and qualitative inquiry: the role of the editorial board. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 4, 168-182. crossref(new window)

43.
Roberts, G. A., Gerrard-Morris, A., Zanger, D., Davis, K. S., & Robinson, D. H. (2006). Trends in female authorships, editorial board memberships, and editorships in school psychology journals from 1991-2004. The School Psychologist, 60(4), 5-10.

44.
Rosenstreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2006). How international are the top academic journals? The case of marketing. European Business Review, 18, 422-436. crossref(new window)

45.
Tsay, M. (2011). A bibliometric analysis and comparison on three information science journals: JASIST, IPM, JOD, 1998-2008. Scientometrics, 89, 591-606. crossref(new window)

46.
Tutarel, O. (2004). Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4:3. Available at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/4/3. Retrieved 2013.02.02. crossref(new window)

47.
Uzun, A. (2004). Assessing internationality of scholarly journals through foreign authorship patterns:The case of major journals in information science, and scientometrics. Scientometrics, 61, 457-465. crossref(new window)

48.
Weinrach, S. G., Thomas, K. R., Pruett, S. R., & Chan, F. (2006). Scholarly productivity of editorial board members of three American counseling and counseling psychology journals. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 28, 303-315. crossref(new window)

49.
Willis, C. L., & McNamee, S. J. (1990). Social networks of science and patterns of publication in leading sociology journals, 1960 to 1985. Science Communication, 11, 363-381. crossref(new window)