JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Individuality and Diversity among Undergraduates' Academic Information Behaviors: An Exploratory Study
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Individuality and Diversity among Undergraduates' Academic Information Behaviors: An Exploratory Study
Mizrachi, Diane;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the information management behaviors of undergraduate students in their dormitory rooms, using Personal Information Management (PIM) as the theoretical framework. Ethnographic methods were applied to study how students devise their own systems combining digital and traditional tools to collect, create, manipulate, organize, and manage the information they need to fulfill their roles as university students. Results show a broad diversity of behaviors influenced more by individual learning styles and preferences than high-tech gadgetry. It is proposed that just as every individual has unique learning styles and preferences, so too do we have individual information styles, and we apply our tools and gadgets in our own ways to best accommodate our own styles.
 Keywords
Information behaviors;personal information management;college students;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Agosto, D. (2002). Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 16-27. crossref(new window)

2.
Barreau, D. (2008). From novice to expert: Personal information management in learning contexts. CHI 2008, Florence, Italy. Retrieved January 27, 2011, from http://pim2008.ethz.ch/papers/pim2008-barreau.pdf

3.
Bergman, Beyth-Marom, & Nachmias. (2003). The user-subjective approach to personal information management systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 872-878. crossref(new window)

4.
Carr, N. (2013, issue 004). Paper versus pixel: The science of reading shows that print and digital experiences are complementary. Nautilus Quarterly, Retrieved November 8, 2013 from http://nautil.us/issue/4/the-unlikely/paper-versus-pixel

5.
Duke, L. M., & Asher, A. D. (Ed.). (2012). College libraries and student culture: What we now know. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

6.
Foster, N.F., & Gibbons, S. (eds.). (2007). Studying Students: The Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester. Chicago. Association of College & Research Libraries.

7.
Hardof-Jaffe, S., Hershkovitz, A., Abu-Kishk, H., Bergman, O., & Nachmias, R. (2009). Students' Organization Strategies of Personal. Journal Of Digital Information, 10(5). Retrieved January 27, 2011, from https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/438/541

8.
Hardof-Jaffe, S., & Nachmias, R. (2013). Students' personal information management, In Jan Herrington et al. (Eds), Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2013 (pp. 820-828). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved November 8, 2013 from http://www.editlib.org/p/112055.

9.
Hewitt, A. (2010). R U Talking 2 Me? UCLA Magazine, July: 23-25, 48.

10.
Jones, W. (2006). Personal Information Management. The Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 453-503.

11.
Jones, W. (2008). Keeping found things found: The study and practice of personal information management. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

12.
Jones, W. (2012). The futureof personal information management: Part I: Our information, always and forever. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.

13.
Kuhlthau, C.C. (1991). Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-371. crossref(new window)

14.
Malone, T.W. (1983). How Do People Organize their Desks? Implications for the Design of Office Information Systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 1(1), 99-112. crossref(new window)

15.
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Bronnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61-68. Retrieved November 8, 2013 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002 crossref(new window)

16.
McMillan, S. J., & Morrison, M. (2006). Coming of age with the Internet: A qualitative exploration of how the Internet has become an integral part of young people's lives. New Media & Society, 8(1), 73-95. crossref(new window)

17.
Mellon, C. (1986). Library anxiety: a grounded theory and its development. College & Research Libraries, 47, 160-165. crossref(new window)

18.
Miedema, J. (2009). "Slow Reading." Duluth, MN: Litwin Books.

19.
Mizrachi, D. (2010). Undergraduates' academic information and library behaviors: preliminary results. Reference services review, 38(4), 571-580. crossref(new window)

20.
Mizrachi, D. (2011). How do they manage it? An exploratory study of undergraduate students in their personal academic ecologies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

21.
Paretta, L., & Catalano, A. (2013). What Students Really do in the Library: An Observational Study. The Reference Librarian, 54(2), 157-167. crossref(new window)

22.
Pena-Shaff, J., Martin, W., & Gay, G. (2001). An epistemological framework for analyzing student interactions in computer-mediated communication environments. Journal of interactive learning research, 12(1), 41-68.

23.
Raine, L., Zickuhr, K., Purcell, K., Madden, M., & Brenner, J. (2012). The rise of e-reading. Retrieved from http://libraries.pewinternet.org/2012/04/04/the-rise-of-e-reading/ 16 July, 2012.

24.
Seamans, N. H. (2002). Student perceptions of information literacy: insights for librarians. Reference Services Review, 30(2), 112-123. crossref(new window)

25.
Valentine, B. (2001). The legitimate effort in research papers: Student commitment versus faculty expectations. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27, 2(2001): 107-15. crossref(new window)

26.
Valtonen, T., Hacklin, S., Dillon, P., Vesisenaho, M., Kukkonen, J., & Hietanen, A. (2012). Perspectives on personal learning environments held by vocational students. Computers & Education, 58, 732-739. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.025. crossref(new window)

27.
Walters, W.H. (2009). Google Scholar Search Performance: Comparative Recall and Precision. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(1), 5-24.

28.
Weiler, A. (2005). Information-seeking behavior in generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(1), 46-53. crossref(new window)

29.
Whitmire, E. (2004). The relationship between undergraduates' epistemological reflection, reflective judgment and their information seeking behavior. Information Processing & Management, 40(1), 97-111. crossref(new window)

30.
Wonpyo, Y. (2010, Feb. 22). University releases Kindle pilot data. The Daily Princetonian, retrieved Sept. 26, 2010, from http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2010/02/22/25262/

31.
Young, J. (2010, Apr. 19). Kindle failed tests at several colleges. Will iPads do better? The Chronicle of Higher Education - Wired Campus, Retrieved Sept. 26, 2010, from http://chronicle.com/blogPost/Kindle-Failed-Tests-at-Seve/23253/