JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Control of Dimethyl Sulfide Emissions Using Biofiltration
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Control of Dimethyl Sulfide Emissions Using Biofiltration
Kong, Sei-Hun; Kim, Jo-Chun; Allen, Eric R.; Park, Jong-Kil;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Laboratory scale experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of a biofilter for eliminating dimethyl sulfide(DMS). A commercial compost/pine bark nugget mixture served as the biofilter material for the experiments. The gas flow rate and DMS concentration entering the filter were varied to study their effect on the biofilter efficiency. The operating parameters, such as the residence time, inlet concentration, pH, water content, and temperature, were all monitored throughout the filter operation. The kinetic dependence of the DMS removal along the column length was also studied to obtain a quantitative description of the DMS elimination. High DMS removal efficiencies(>95%) were obtained using the compost filter material seeded with activated sludge. DMS pollutant loading rates of up to 5.2 and 5.5 g-DMS/m/hr were effectively handled by the upflow and downflow biofilter columns, respectively. The macrokinetics of the DMS removal were found to be fractional-order diffusion-limited over the 9 to 25 ppm range of inlet concentrations tested. The upflow column had an average macrokinetic coefficient(Kf/) of 0.0789 0.0178 ppm//sec, while the downflow column had an average coefficient of 0.0935 0.0200 ppm//sec. Shorter residence times resulted in a lower mass transfer of the pollutant from the gas phase to the aqueous liquid phase, thereby decreasing the efficiency.
 Keywords
dimethyl disulfide;biofilter;residence time;inlet concentration;removal;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
J. Air & Waste Management Association, 2001. vol.51. pp.11-16 crossref(new window)

2.
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 1998. vol.28. 1, pp.89-117 crossref(new window)

3.
Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 1994. vol.44. 7, pp.863-868

4.
Organosulfur Emissions from Industrial Sources, in Sulfur in the Environment, 1978.

5.
Exhaust Gas Purification, in Biotechnology (8), 1986.

6.
Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1991.

7.
Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 1991. vol.41. pp.1045 crossref(new window)

8.
Bioprocess Engineering, 1986. vol.1. pp.61-69 crossref(new window)

9.
Journal of Air and Waste Manage. Assoc., 2001. vol.51. Dec., pp.1662-1670 crossref(new window)

10.
Journal of Air and Waste Manage. Assoc., 2001. vol.51. Sep., pp.1351-1358 crossref(new window)

11.
Journal of Air and Waste Manage. Assoc., 2001. vol.51. Aug., pp.1237-1244 crossref(new window)

12.
Technical Bulletin, 1993. vol.656.

13.
Quality Assurance Methods Manual for Laboratory Analytical Techniques, prepared for the USEPA abd USDA Forest Service Forest Response Program, 1986.

14.
Master of Engineering Thesis, University of Florida, 1987.

15.
Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 1991. vol.71. 6, pp.384-389 crossref(new window)

16.
Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 1990. vol.70. 5, pp.334-339 crossref(new window)

17.
Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 1991. vol.72. 5, pp.392-396 crossref(new window)

18.
Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 1991. vol.74. 3, pp.174-178 crossref(new window)

19.
Biotechnology, 1986. pp.8

20.
Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1983. vol.25. pp.3089-3102 crossref(new window)